I have found Anna’s Archive to be more reliable than sci-hub
To be clear, Anna’s Archive now manages sci-hub’s database, doesn’t it?
I haven’t been able to find any info on that either than that Anna’s Archive mirrors sci-hub and that sci-hub has not been updated since 2021 so Anna’s Archive has a more up to date database.
Fair enough, thanks
Came for the porn, stayed for Exogenous estradiol enhances apoptosis in regressing post-partum rat corpora lutea possibly mediated by prolactin
Can’t stop laughing. Just had a serious conversation about complex sentences and words. I showed this article as part of the conversation. Now I can’t stop laughing.
The only words that I understand in that sentence are disgusting
Lol I kind of like these hyper specific paper titles for the way they simplify my search, but if you say it out loud you end up a little winded
This is why I never click on a link before looking at the URL.
75% you say? more like rule 3/4 then!
Best I can do is 9/12
You forgor to remove the outliers.
Sex Panther has no outliers.
3/4 of the time it applies everytime.
Resource List: https://mander.xyz/post/20202747?scrollToComments=true
Seems centered on books not papers
It’s both, depending on the link. If it is not on scihub or anna’s archives, you will likely be able to get it through https://wosonhj.com/
Can also try the NSF Public Access Repository for papers that include authors from the US.
