Proton: “We’re consolidating our social media presence due to limited resources and no longer posting on Mastodon. Follow us on Reddit for the latest updates”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    932 months ago

    Btw, their Mastodon account has more followers than their Bluesky and Threads accounts combined, both of which they are keeping. What a stupid decision.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      462 months ago

      It’s not stupidity; it’s censorship. They can control what gets posted on their own Reddit community. They can’t control what people are actually saying on the fediverse.

      People need to realize that Proton has gone to the shitter; stop paying for them and migrate away as soon as possible.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 months ago

        And reddit has been extra aggressive in allowing mods ban users more easier too, as of this month. Now some mods are “cahoots with admins”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 months ago

        Hmm good point. Honestly didn’t think about that. In that case I’m surprised they’re keeping the Bluesky account up, the replies are 90% negative there.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 months ago

          Checked both out of curiosity and seems like they are active on twitter but stopped posting weeks ago on bluesky after their feelings got hurt there from ceo backlash.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      They will leave Blue sky for twitter once , people find out as well, mark my words, and they will add Facebook eventually, since it’s still the place where right wingers flee to have more administrative control over their groups, of they get ousted from reddit

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Whats the problem with creating one message and using the APIs for posting it on all social medai? With optional formatting per platform?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 months ago

      They wrote that they don’t want to “write and forget” but engage with people (as they do on Reddit, for better or worse). I think it’s opinable, but it sounds reasonable to me. What is the value of having an official account which just reposts one-way communication already published on the blog and on the newsletter? Anybody can build such a bot, but it’s not “presence” the way I interpret it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      302 months ago

      Because these bridges are one way only.

      They will get spicy replies on niche platforms, not see them until they go viral in a bad way.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 months ago

        Ohh that’s a fair point! Maybe there’s a way of fixing that by adding some “post your concerns over on reddit” or something similar, but idk.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 months ago

          Even so. It’ll be an unmoderated by them section of conversation about their company. Probably a hard pass from any company with an HR department.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    352 months ago

    due to limited resources

    Either:

    • We have lost our password
    • Our C and V keys are broken and we can not copy paste our social media messages anymore
  • Lad
    link
    fedilink
    English
    312 months ago

    Proton just dropping the ball over and over again these days. That’s why I’m working on migrating from their sevices, then deleting my Proton account.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 months ago

        It’s a little better, but still not as clean as Proton. The mobile menus really suck.

        But they’re good enough, so I use them.

  • Gikiski
    link
    fedilink
    112 months ago

    I still don’t know how to feel about Proton, even with an early (and continued) email presence there. Reddit? I see this post because of lemmy.world and fedia.

  • BombOmOm
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 months ago

    If they aren’t getting much traction somewhere, but are spending outsized resources there, it makes sense to redirect the manhours elsewhere.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    182 months ago

    Since I have found it historically hard to engage on this (broader) subject around here, just yesterday I put together my own thoughts at https://loudwhisper.me/blog/proton-fediverse-burnout/

    Personally, I did not see the value of their Mastodon presence, it was write only marketing communication, no engagement with the community anyway. That happened only ever on Reddit, which I think is going to continue being the case.

    They push the same info via email newsletter, if someone really wants that stuff.

    Either way, the post above covers my take on the whole drama, not just this last small chapter.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 months ago

      Read your entire post. You claim people will say you come off as an apologist and you do.

      As a person who was seriously considered switching to Proton this just reminds me of why I should not. It is clear no matter what corner of the Internet we run to as long as it is into the open arm of corporations it is a mistake.

      Blue sky, Proton, etc. are not a solution to a problem. They are just the newest version of putting lipstick on a pig. We need to move beyond corporate control and it is clear Proton, even being a nonprofit, is no solution.

      I find your hand waving of the CEOs position particularly distasteful. There are a lot of CEOs out there that don’t decide to get all political. They don’t do this because they have an image or brand to protect. Maybe I just like a good illusion though.

      In this respect I am glad he opened his ignorant mouth and showed he has no business commenting on politics. He is no political scientist, just another person drunk on his accomplishments trying to pretend he knows fuck all about anything.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 months ago

        Thanks for the response, despite the fact we disagree quite substantially.

        I think it’s OK that different people have different points of view. Everyone’s opinion also should fit within a broader (political) praxis and strategy that they support.

        There are a lot of CEOs out there that don’t decide to get all political. They don’t do this because they have an image or brand to protect. Maybe I just like a good illusion though.

        This is something I particularly disagree, as you probably have already read. Ignorance on once’s position doesn’t mean that position doesn’t exist. I appreciate Jeff Bezos for example writing that memo (just yesterday’s published), compared to acting the same way without my full knowledge.

        He is no political scientist

        If this was the criteria to comment on politics, honestly we should shut down everything (including Lemmy) :)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          Your don’t really have much of opinion except as an apologist. A devil’s advocate defender of corporate and political nonsense without stating your actual thoughts beyond, “it is more nuanced that that” is pretty disingenuous.

          It is okay to have differing opinions when someone’s opinion smells like shit. All the while you pass out the verbal/written clothespins is really just your version of carrying water. I know, I know it is more nuanced than that. Only it really isn’t.

          And yes, you should have a degree or really just some critical thinking skills before deploying your wanna be political commentary on the world when you are in a leadership position. Otherwise please keep that shit to yourself and keep it out of your business if you ever want my money.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            42 months ago

            I felt that was really uncalled for. The whole post elaborates quite a lot in thousands of words, and I feel like your summary is not really accurate. Unfortunately, I have no way to debate accusations that follow a circular logic, so I won’t attempt to do so.

            Otherwise please keep that shit to yourself and keep it out of your business if you ever want my money.

            I reiterate that I find curious that you seem to prefer ignorance of those positions, as if the reality is suddenly better if you don’t know a problem exists. You would rather pay for Proton not knowing that Andy Yen thinks what he thinks than having more information so that you can choose to stop paying. Obviously just an example, same thing applies to the WaPo or Tesla, or any other similar case.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              There is nothing to debate because my summary and all your replies just reinforce my opinion of you. This is just my critical opinion though and it is not meant as an attack, but a wake up call. I appreciate the time and effort you put into this even if it is misplaced at best

              We all know problems exist. We all know speech has consequences. A leader, particularly in business, has a special fiduciary responsibility to their business. If they choose to expose themselves as politically ignorant and supporting positions that are indefensible the consequences are they will lose business. This is all I am pointing out.

              You conflate two things here which are a person’s right to speak their mind and their responsibility to bigger issues. I get you want to hear their opinions and then play devil’s advocate about them because that is just what you do.

              You are clearly technically minded but you are also clearly not politically minded. Much like our errant CEO and reminiscent of when a US congressman tries to grasp web technology. They say a lot of ignorant things about tech just like Andy says ignorant things about politics.

              Clearly you feel a kinship with this man because you are also heavily invested in the tech world. You defend him because you also admire him. No amount of debate or hand waving will change this immutable fact.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                32 months ago

                If they choose to expose themselves as politically ignorant and supporting positions that are indefensible the consequences is they will lose business. This is all I am pointing out.

                Very easy to understand. But why should we (the customers, citizens, etc.) care? My interest is to have that knowledge, it’s the shareholder interest to have the business succeeding, and they take care of that. So why from your words you seem to imply that it’s “better” if they keep their mouth shut (and therefore protect the businesses)?

                I get you want to hear their opinions and then play devil’s advocate about them because that is just what you do.

                Unnecessary ad-hominem, which is also easily proved wrong. I hear the opinions of Musk, of Bezos (but also of Zuckerberg, of the Nvidia guy, of Altman and many others) and I am happy because with that information I can (and do) distance myself from their companies. In this case, I feel differently and therefore I take another decision. I like to think that I can critically evaluate situations, but if the conclusion I end up with is different from yours it doesn’t mean that mine is wrong by definition.

                You are clearly technically minded but you are also clearly not politically minded.

                You are clearly wrong about this. I have nothing to prove obviously, but you can easily also see that by just browsing through other posts on my blog, for example this. I will even go a step further and say that the purism and localism (as defined in this book) that emerges from your words is something I explicitly want to distance myself from, because it has proved to be a complete failure in terms of political battles.

                I am referring at things like:

                It is clear no matter what corner of the Internet we run to as long as it is into the open arm of corporations it is a mistake.


                Clearly you feel a kinship with this man because you are also heavily invested in the tech world. You defend him because you also admire him.

                I don’t. I actually can’t care less about him, and I barely know anything about him. My involvement is very limited to this case, and that is because wanting to understand inevitably forced me to learn certain things and inform myself. Please don’t assume other people’s positions.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 months ago

                  You can only see better from your point of view that you want more knowledge. Keeping their mouth shut is what leaders do everyday to protect their business, their profits, their coworkers, etc.

                  I suppose you have to be a knowledgeable leader to understand this. We often thrust people into leadership positions and we end up with people like Andy as a result.

                  I don’t pretend to the arbitrator of what is right or wrong, but I have learned a lot in my lifetime and calling a spade a spade is something I believe is important. You take all this so personally and thus show a certain level of immaturity as you probably feel I display as well.

                  Your proof of your political commentary only supports my assertion that you are very technically minded. Your critique of cloud computing shows your technical understanding is profound, but does little to forward a feeling that you are politically minded. You state yourself you are just learning about this which is very clear.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      172 months ago

      Yeah damn that hurts. Just signed up for tuta. I will be leaving proton soon I guess. A shame, I had just finished moving all my communications there…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    192 months ago

    I did weeks of work migrating every password and email address to proton. Sucks the stances they are taking but now I’m kinda stuck, and it’s still better than Google.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            6
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Every account I have on the internet has a unique randomly generated email that forwards to my real email.

            iCloud and Proton are the two big names that support this. It’s invaluable.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 months ago

              Ah, I see the confusion. Originally you mentioned two Proton services, password manager and email provider. The person who replied to you suggested two alternative password managers (one commercial, the other one FOSS). You then replied saying without a specific email feature it would be pointless, which would be fair for an alternative email provider but doesn’t apply in this case.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Well since in proton the email alias feature is integrated into the password manager (which is really useful) I don’t see them as that unlinked. It would be like having a password manager without the ability to make random passwords, basically pointless. One compromised service and my email will be spammed across the internet until the end of time.

            • SgtSuckaFree
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 months ago

              I’ve been using neomailbox for almost 10 years for this, so maybe check them out

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 months ago

              There are other options for email aliases. iCloud has a pretty robust system, and its ubiquity makes it less likely to be filtered.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 months ago

                If it’s an unknown or less popular service they are less likely to add it to a blacklist IME

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 months ago

                  True, but that’s defense by concealment. If they notice the domain, they can block it without harming their business. My argument is that iCloud is too large for them to block.

        • AmbiguousProps
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 months ago

          Tuta has a catch-all option that you could consider. Makes it so you can make any email address under your domain and it’ll get to your mailbox.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 months ago

      Im sure there are tools/scripts for migrating easily. Proton is a sinking ship, anyone who denies it is just lying to themselves at this point.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 months ago

        That’s impossible, the email aliases are under their domain. You’d have to change all your accounts. I’m not doing that again. Hopefully they just change their tune.

  • katy ✨
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1222 months ago

    “We hate that our CEO keeps getting called out and slammed by our followers so we’re gonna stick our fingers in our ears”

    Also good time to remind everyone Tuta exists :) https://tuta.com/

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 months ago

      Would’ve switched in a heartbeat with IMAP support but that’s not in the cards. Stuck with Proton for now.

        • _cryptagion [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 months ago

          A better way to put it is that email clients don’t support Proton. And I doubt any are going to make an effort to, unless the way Proton works becomes the norm. You would have to completely redesign the email client.

          It’s far easier for everyone to write an app that can then be used by any email client.

    • Liam Mayfair
      link
      fedilink
      English
      132 months ago

      I’ve been using Tuta Mail for a few years now. No complaints. Most of the features you would expect. Lack of IMAP support is kinda disappointing but survivable. Their email security is very strong though — they encrypt every part of your email, including subject (some providers only encrypt the body). They’re also rolling out post-quantum encryption of email data at rest, which tickles my crypto nerd side.

      They’ve still a loong way to go to match Proton’s product suite though, as they only offer Email, Contacts and Calendar for now. They’re working on Drive storage next, which is the main reason I currently use Proton.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 months ago

        Tuta is great, I will start from that. But they encrypt the subject line, in addition to the body afaik. It is technically impossible to encrypt “every part of the email” because that would break delivery (e.g., metadata such as recipient or timestamps).

        This also has the cost of a nonstandard protocol (not plain PGP), with all that implies in terms of compatibility, maintenance needs etc.

        • Liam Mayfair
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 months ago

          That’s a fair point about the portability of their protocol. And yeah, you’re right that they don’t encrypt everything. I’d meant to say “they encrypt everything you can encrypt without making the email undeliverable” but my fingers decided to type something else.

      • Noxy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 months ago

        They’ve still a loong way to go to match Proton’s product suite though, as they only offer Email, Contacts and Calendar for now

        honestly that’s a plus for me, I’d rather they focus on a small set of products and do really well with them. before I left Proton I was wary of their scope creep, and then the crypto wallet shit

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 months ago

          Funny that the crypto wallet also upset people in the space who like crypto. Because crypto, IF USED CORRECTLY, can be a privacy tool (because it is the main way to pay online that can be utilized without KYC). However, such people got upset not just with Proton broadening their product scope for no reason, but also the fact that Monero was not even considered, despite it having built-in privacy protections unlike Bitcoin, and overall being agreed on as today’s “digital cash”.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    132 months ago

    The only thing Proton has going for it that Tuta does not is the .onion site and even that constantly leaks to clearweb so fuck’em.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 months ago

      There are a few other things I miss from Proton:

      • Proton Bridge
      • nicer interface
      • better search

      Yet I’m a paying Tuta customer now instead of a paying Proton customer.