U.S. President Donald Trump has ordered a suspension of all military aid to Ukraine, escalating pressure on President Volodymyr Zelensky mere days after a heated exchange in the Oval Office cast doubt on U.S. support for Kyiv.

A senior Defense Department official told Bloomberg that all U.S. military assistance to Ukraine is on hold until Trump determines that Ukrainian leaders are making a genuine effort toward peace.

The pause affects not only future aid but also weapons already in transit, including shipments on aircraft and ships, as well as equipment awaiting transfer in Poland.

MBFC
Archive

Edit: changed source from Bloomberg to Kyiv Independent b/c there’s no paywall and more detail in the story.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    376 months ago

    I would love to see everyone just start ignoring Trump and everything he says and just keeps doing their job.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        46 months ago

        And very seriously listen and write down his commands and say of course sir then just not do it. For years and report back to him that he is hailed as the best president ever for his orders, and let him live his fantasy, we can even hold parades and stuff and the fun thing is that people would actually genuinely be glad when he comes because they know it’s going to be a festival and their job is just to pretend to be awed by his senile ramblings, which honestly sounds so much fun

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      We can blame the people who voted for hillary clinton in the 2016 primary for why we have 2 trump presidencies.

      We can blame the people who voted for Biden in the 2020 primary for why we essentially have 12 years of trump.

      Democrats have shown repeatedly they’d rather have trump over someone who tries to reduce the disparity in wealth, so that’s what we get.

      Now they can all order doordash from their quarter-of-a-million-dollars suburban homes while complaining they don’t have enough money. (and get mad at anyone who criticizes them for it)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16 months ago

        What suburb are you in that you get a whole house for 250k AND doordash still delivers there???

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        156 months ago

        No, i think I’m primarily going to blame the people who voted for Trump for Trump being elected.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 months ago

          You can blame both!

          It’s just expected that republicans will work against the working class at this point. The “lesser evil” is seen as good because of how weak, greedy, entitled, and pitiful liberals are.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      116 months ago

      And then finally we will build a memorial building in their honor? One where all their carcasses are placed in a viewing chamber protected by glass at the basement of the building where as the first floor and subsequent other floors are all subdivided in public toilets and urinals. You stop there waiting for a bus, but you need to go. So you get into urinal #275. You do your business, then you either flush or you pay $0.50. Then you go to the basemen if you paid. There you press in your urinal number to watch a beautiful yellow fountain splash on their graves. Putin will land there first. Then after every nazi will end up in there. All profit goes the LGBTQ+A community. Anyhoo, I’m not the first to propose this instead of a library. We could have an LGBTQ+A library on the 2nd floor?

  • Lanske
    link
    fedilink
    English
    566 months ago

    I have not a lot of knowledge how American politics work, but isn’t this for congress to decide? how is Trump so powerful? (sorry for my daft question)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      76 months ago

      The president was always able to stop aid under certain conditions. Trump is just going to certify that one of those conditions exist no matter how ridiculous it is.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      476 months ago

      It’s very illegal. He has already been impeached once for withdrawing military aid to Ukraine in his first term.

      And you see where that got us.

      • Lanske
        link
        fedilink
        English
        116 months ago

        Yeah indeed, but now he has got the full backing and more Trump tronies?!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      336 months ago

      Republicans hold the majority in congress, so they’re refusing to push back and are just allowing him to usurp power from them.

      • Lanske
        link
        fedilink
        English
        86 months ago

        Thnx for your reply! i understand that, but it seems nothing goes via congress?!

        • jackeryjoo
          link
          fedilink
          English
          156 months ago

          Congress is a check and balance to executive power, just like the judicial.

          They are not checking or balancing his power. So they are in effect, impotent.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            46 months ago

            And they don’t care because the White House is occupied by someone on their team. This country fucking sickens me.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      316 months ago

      It is for Congress to decide such matters. It says so right in our constitution, but our Legislative branch has been ceding their ability to check Executive overreach for decades. Now, with a complicit Congress as the majority, they will never challenge Trump on anything he does, no matter how unconstitutional or illegal it might be. Same goes for the Judiciary as well, chock full of partisan hacks who bend and twist their interpretation of the language of the constitution to cherry pick a favorable ruling for anything that Trump does.

      Basically, our system of checks and balances that are meant to keep one aspect of the government from becoming too powerful has been completely subsumed by ideologues who prefer monarchy to democracy. The executive now essentially has unchecked authority and is in full control of the government apparatus.

    • deaf_fish
      link
      fedilink
      English
      166 months ago

      We are entering a “yeah and who’s going to stop me era of US politics”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      45
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      It isn’t daft. The Republicans since Reagan have pushed a fringe legal theory called the Unitary Executive Theory. Basically, they want the president to fully control the executive branch and military such that theirs is the only voice that matters for much of the government. Not unlike a king, but partially checked by congress and the courts. They have been taking (illegal) actions to try to get sued, and also have been suing others/other branches of government, to try to get the Supreme Court to hear cases that will support this fringe legal theory so that it becomes the law of the land.

      I am not a lawyer, but this is possibly something Trump can legally do since he is Commander in Chief of the armed forces. However, this seems more like an apportionment thing, which is Congress’ responsibility. Congress has allocated funds to send military aid to Ukraine. So, even if Trump as Commander in Chief could say “no more weapons to ukraine”, it seems doubtful to me that he could (legally) stop weapons shipments currently en route.

      But, by the time whatever government office sues the office of the president to get a judge to enjoin them to send the agreed upon weapons that were already apportioned, it will already have hurt Ukraine somewhat. Trump often weaponizes inefficiency. And these sort of illegal acts aren’t crimes per se - they’re just procedural breaches - the legal remedy is just to reverse the action.

      So, probably not legal. But Trump gets to weaponize his administration’s incompetence (or feigned incompetence) to at least delay aid. More competent people may support these actions, knowing they’re illegal, to try and strengthen the president’s role even further.

      • Lanske
        link
        fedilink
        English
        116 months ago

        Wow! Thanks so much for this reply! this is very helpful, thnx a lot

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          136 months ago

          The answer is simpler than that: the “checks and balances” system is a facade created to prevent meaningful progressive policy from passing. There’s a reason why Trump can modify a billion laws from day 1, but poor Biden couldn’t possibly do anything to codify abortion as a right or prevent the bombing of children in Gaza.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            6
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            This isn’t quite right. Trump didn’t really modify laws. That isn’t even something he can claim to do since he is the head of the Executive branch, not the Legislative one. He issued executive orders, many of which were illegal, and he had some cronies who enacted some of them anyway - others did not enact some of these, and others were not really actionable (like when he declared that no one has a gender). He did rescind many policies, but he can’t just make laws go away on his own. There are literally hundreds of court cases currently challenging these executive orders - seeing as how the judiciary is the primary check on the executive branch, that is the system working to check presidential power.

            However, I am not a liberal, I am a socialist and do not think this is working well - there are many problems here. The highest levels of the judiciary have been largely captured by far-right judges, many of whom are specifically aligned with Trump’s goals and support the unitary executive theory. Also, this method of checking presidential power is extremely slow. For every illegal action Trump’s administration takes, a court case has to be crafted, filed, heard, and adjudicated. Every one. And invariably, some will not reach the correct outcome and others will never actually be taken to court - there are just too many.

            Basically, the administration is using the fact that they control every branch of government to dismantle or capture core government agencies and to provide cover for various illegal actions - forcing them through if only temporarily for various political and structural ends. A soft coup, basically. So yeah, the fact that something like this is possible is proof of the flaws inherent in this system of government.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              46 months ago

              That’s a lot of words to say that I’m right in practice even if not in principle lmao.

              I’m a commie too, BTW. You’re way too charitable to the US institutions IMO.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              26 months ago

              So it turns out that what matters most in the end is less the intricacies of the system, and more what type of people get elected

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      266 months ago

      how is Trump so powerful?

      The Republican party controls Congress and they have abdicated their responsibilities to our Constitution and, by extension, the American people in favor of an authoritarian because they have accepted him as their leader, thus giving away their own power.

      Our forefathers never expected Congress to give away its own power. Because it doesn’t really make any sense in the long term for them to do so.

      We are experiencing a coup. Most Americans are too uneducated to understand this.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    836 months ago

    How much more do we have to witness before we accept, as a society, that Donald Trump and the GOP are enemies of the United States of America, and act accordingly?

    We are suffering and losing our position as a world leader because of a felon rapist traitor. When are we going to stop this?

    • ProdigalFrog
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22
      edit-2
      6 months ago
      1. Joining and organizing within your local community to create connections with others is incredibly powerful, will lay the groundwork for effective resistance.
      2. We can effect things drastically with a general strike. This can massively impact their income streams, and can bring a government to its knees if done on a large enough scale.
      3. Join the IWW and attempt to unionize your workplace, so that the general strike is even more effective.

      If we put in the work, we can resist this and we can win. Join up with allies while we still can easily!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      286 months ago

      When are we going to stop this?

      When congress starts impeachment proceedings. Call your representatives. Listening you complain is their job.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              16 months ago

              It sounded like you were saying “You already impeached him, and he’s still president (so impeaching him again is a waste of time)”, but I could’ve misread you.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                That is also my point. Don’t worry though, you keep impeaching him until he dissolves congress.

                You’re response being ‘yeah but you can be impeached multiple times’ exactly demonstrates the weakness of that action.

    • Match!!
      link
      fedilink
      English
      76 months ago

      Have you decided what means are acceptable for resistance for yourself yet

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    316 months ago

    I kinda wonder what people in the 3 letter agencies are thinking right now. I would hope that enough of these agencies actually view Trump as a fundamental threat to democracy, because he actually is. People have warned for this to happen, for a while now, even though many are surprised at the speed at which it happens. But still, you would kind of hope for some of these agencies to actually stand for the constitution, instead of for the ruling party and his current president.

    The US is so much more than just the current political ruling class. It’s sad that there seems at least, to be so little visible opposition to their efforts to derail the US geopolitical power and to overthrow the system of law and order. One who the Republicans should hold deep, and definitely the people who pledge their allegiance to the constitution. I wonder if it would have gone different if someone like Saunders or Obama would have tried a similar play.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
      link
      fedilink
      English
      146 months ago

      The three letter agencies haven’t ever really been known for their respect of the constitution 😅…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      46 months ago

      Derailing US political power is a good thing. Not good for the US, but good for the world.

      • andz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        36 months ago

        Giving russia more power won’t be any better for the world at large.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        56 months ago

        We will see. Pax Americana has been a hugely stabilizing force in many regions around the world. If an empire falls, fighting over the power vacuum commences. Empires get replaced by chaos and eventually other empires.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        86 months ago

        Are we also derailing Chinese and Russian power, and magically disarming all the nukes? Or are we just shitting on America and hoping nobody realizes that means there’s going to be a power vacuum?

    • Fair Fairy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      36 months ago

      See, there is a strategy - u just tunnelvisioned and stuck in a cold war

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        166 months ago

        I feel like the dumb from reddit is leaking into lemmy more and more. You’re a traitor to democracy if you think we shouldn’t fund and supply Ukraine

        • Fair Fairy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          26 months ago

          US is broke, have u seen the debt numbers?
          It went into unontrollable territory.
          Payments for debt financing alone is as much as military spending. This is dumb.
          US has no choice but to radically change

          • keropoktasen
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16 months ago

            These people cannot stand reason and logic, that’s why you’re getting downvoted.

        • TheLowestStone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          56 months ago

          If no one engages with the troll it with the troll it will get bored and leave.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          26 months ago

          How is one a traitor to democracy for opposing unlimited funding and supplying of Ukraine?

  • Teknikal
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Doesn’t really matter most European tech is way ahead of the US anyway, it’s just they the US pay stupid amounts to their own companies. I kinda feel most US tech is a super expensive in comparison honestly.

    I feel a cupholder on a US jet would be valued at something like 50,000. I’d honestly be really curious how a Rafale fared against say a f-35 I suspect it would win

    My suspicion is an European jets would own and devestate an American ones while being a small fraction of the price.

    Yes I am honestly saying while America spends stupid amount off Defense they don’t hold the slightest advantage tech wise.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      56 months ago

      In that specific match up the F-35 would win the majority of the time. The Rafale would win when it was able to get inside the F-35’s missiles. The problem is a modern fighter versus fighter engagement starts with long range missiles launches. So the side that sees first launches first. Then they go into tight S turns to keep radar tracking on their missiles while maintaining range. At some point the enemy also acquires them on radar and does the same thing. They will keep doing this until the enemy missiles reach a minimum distance and they will dive and turn away with chaff. This breaks the radar link but you’re hoping the missiles are close enough to acquire targets on their own. So the side that sees the other one first and launches first, even by a few seconds gains a massive advantage. That’s what stealth tech is about.

      Now that said, there is a Euro stealth fighter in the works, but it’s not expected until 2040.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      to add in, european scientists often move to US for more income, i see the reverse happening down the line, fleeing back to thier countries. the only reason why us tech is ahead because scientists from other countries are moving here.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Any suggestions on what to do with my retirement? How to get it out? Where to put it?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    76 months ago

    US apparently also quit providing intel to Ukraine. Sorry for the Dutch link as source, best to use a browser translator on it.

    Article

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1356 months ago

    until Trump determines that Ukrainian leaders are making a genuine effort toward peace.

    They are literally shooting every Russian they spot on their soil, how is that not making a genuine effort toward peace?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      66 months ago

      They are literally shooting every Russian they spot on their soil

      There are 8 millions russian speakers living in ukraine i hope these don’t count as “russian”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        86 months ago

        Are they wearing a Russian military uniform? Then they are an enemy combatant.

        It’s really not that hard, dude.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        26 months ago

        I hope every English sepaker doesn’t count as “English”. Wouldn’t want to have a king.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        106 months ago

        How many English speakers are there in the world. Are they considered English? Don’t be stupid.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 months ago

          Don’t get confused, ukraine and russia share a border there are many ukrainians living in russia and vice versa

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            26 months ago

            Yeah, I heard there are many Ukrainian kids living in Russia against their will after Russia stole them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        296 months ago

        Only the Russian imperial narrative is so that Russians speaking people are considered Russians. There are Russian speaking people in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Belarus, Ukraine and in many -Stans, they are not Russians.

        Not a very useful remark. The Ukrainian army is full of Russians speaking people.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 months ago

          There are ethnic russians there. What i’m pointing out is that “shooting every russian they spot” sounds racist.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            216 months ago

            I saw you around, and I know also you are Italian, so I will tell you in a way you understand. You are being a “puntalcazzista” to throw shade on Ukraine with vague racism claims. Anybody with a pulse will understand that “shooting every Russian on the spot” means “shooting every invader”, and that roughly would include also north Koreans or other ethnicities, should those set foot in Ukraine to assist Russian invasion. You are trying to claim an interpretation that doesn’t make sense, because - as I told you and you can easily verify - the Ukrainian army itself is full of Russian speaking people, who you might call “ethnic Russian” - whatever you think that means. So unless you are honestly suggesting that OP was suggesting Ukrainian army is also shooting on the spot to members of its own army, we both know what you are doing.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              26 months ago

              I saw you around, and I know also you are Italian, so I will tell you in a way you understand. You are being a “puntalcazzista” to throw shade on Ukraine with vague racism claims. Anybody with a pulse will understand that “shooting every Russian on the spot” means “shooting every invader”

              You must be new here, people have been racist toward russians for a good time.

              https://sh.itjust.works/post/27157199

              How exactly i’m throwing shade on ukraine by pointing out a racist generalization in comment?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                56 months ago

                I am not new, but I have a skill that you might find useful, it’s called “context”.

                racist generalization in comment?

                Because there is no any racial generalization. From the context it was clear to anybody who is in good faith what OP meant. Even if it wasn’t, OP comment was a statement on what is happening, so your remark “I hope they don’t…” doesn’t make any fucking sense, because you can just check what they are doing. Currently Russians in Ukraine that are being shot are invading troops.

                So let’s make a parallel. “Partisans were shooting germans”, in the context of Italian resistance. Do you think it’s a racist remark? Would you feel the need to say " oh boy, I hope they don’t shoot German civilians", “oh, there are ethnical Germans in the north, I hope they are not shooting them”. No you wouldn’t, because what you are doing is not in good faith, you are not raising any valid concern, you are just purposefully misunderstanding OP to stir shit.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  16 months ago

                  partisans were shooting germans troops, soldiers or the nazi they weren’t “shooting every german on the spot"

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                196 months ago

                You’re either not understanding the intent of their message or you’re willfully twisting it.

                That’s what is being pointed out.

                They’re clearly referencing the invaders, you misunderstood and took umbrage where you didn’t need to. Having been corrected you’re still pushing the idea that they were being racist.

                You’re acting in bad faith.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  16 months ago

                  You’re either not understanding the intent of their message or you’re willfully twisting it.

                  How i’m twisting anything? To me it looks like you are try to twist things here accusing me of being in bad faith when i simply pointed out yet another discrimination against “russians” as if they were all bad. Are you aware that there are russian people living in ukraine?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        26 months ago

        Context clues, my friend.

        That post is clearly referring to shooting Russian soldiers that have invaded.

        And just to help you further, the adjective “Russian” in that sentence refers to the state for which the soldiers fight. So a “Russian soldier” could be some poor dude from North Korea who got shipped over.

        To further aid understanding, look at the military of a diverse place like the United States. You will have “American soldiers” working side by side who have different ethnic backgrounds and were even born on other continents.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 months ago

          If USA were to invade mexico and someone would come up with the quote “they are literally shooting every american they spot on their soil” wouldn’t it sound odd?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16 months ago

            Only if you ignore the context.

            If I said “Mexico isn’t even trying to end this war” and you said “they are literally shooting every American that steps across the border!” it would not sound odd at all.

            And it certainly wouldn’t sound bigoted against an ethnicity.