An enraged Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) again lashed out at Senate Democrats over what she called Friday evening an “inexplicable abdication.”

  • Monkey With A Shell
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1183 months ago

    My YES vote is not an endorsement of this deeply flawed CR. My YES vote is [100 percent] about refusing to shut our government down. I refuse to punish working families and plunge millions of Americans into chaos. -Fedderman

    For fuck sake man, have you looked around? Shutting down everything and nerfing this tool’s ability to direct anyone to do anything would be less chaotic than it is right now.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      47
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      You can’t blame him. He is brain damaged. That’s why he’s conservative. He’s the only DEI hire that should be removed.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        alot of stroke often turn into a nutty right winger, or a nutty right winger christian. tila tequila, kevin sorbo, or had brain damage from other sources. i was watching a video of someone with schizophrenia and how he fell into the right wing/fundamentalism rabbit hole and said it was a very dangeorus mix.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      113 months ago

      fetterman was always a hack, i dont think he really cares about “working families” after his stroke.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    43 months ago

    Chuck you fuckin fuck you. Always plenty of Democrats to give Republicans what they want, and then when the shoe is on the foot they pretend to be overpowered at every step. Ohh won’t someone not think of the Senate parlitarian. Fucking worthless sobs.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      283 months ago

      It’s right there in the article.

      We had an agreed upon plan, House took immense risk, then Senate turned around midway and destroyed it w/ a fear-based, inexplicable abdication.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        53 months ago

        That is what Democrats have always done. AOC endorsed these people. This is not a surprise to anyone who paid attention the last 20 years.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          43 months ago

          You’re blaming the wrong person, but it has reached the point where people need to seriously consider what the point of the Democratic Party is if they won’t even offer a token resistance.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            43 months ago

            AOC is there to offer the token resistance. The democrats are doing what they have always done; capitulate to the right because they too are bought and paid for by Republican donors.

  • HubertManne
    link
    fedilink
    63 months ago

    I have been thinking about this and im no longer sure this was a bad move. With what trump is doing now in tearing apart the government. It can be fought in the courts. With a shutdown he would have cart blanche to furlough anyone he wants and keep paying his insiders and the courts could not say boo because shutdown. Further he could say all bad effects are because of the democrats because shutdown. At least now the courts can fight it and the bad effects are all from his poor decisions.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      23 months ago

      Even if the right move was “give up and do what the Republicans want,” they still did a terrible job. House Democrats held the line and stuck their necks out, only to get blindsided, and Schumer shouldn’t have signaled that there’d be a fight right before he caved. The left hand doesn’t know what the right hand is doing, and only a handful of people in the party seem to even be trying to do anything.

      • HubertManne
        link
        fedilink
        13 months ago

        I can agree with the second part but the first part is just a phrasing to make it sound bad. I mean the move to use the republicans blunder against them sounds a lot better. I don’t really know what internal talk went with the democrats but I would not be surprised if it was somewhat like what we see online but with the membership with some saying we can’t go with anything they do on principle and others saying wait a second doing that will be overall worse.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      133 months ago

      You’re missing a fundamental truth here. They control the government. If they wanted to shut it down they could have done that. This bill was better for them than a straight up shut down.

      There’s also the other problem which is if someone needs your votes on a bill to pass it then you should be able to negotiate things into said bill before you vote for it. That’s politics 101. Chuck Schumer has failed at the very fundamental aspect of politics here. He gave away his vote for nothing. Or as I suspect gave it away because he’s okay with everything in the bill because it’s what he wants as well.

      • HubertManne
        link
        fedilink
        23 months ago

        It would have looked incredibly bad for them to shut it down. They are the party in control. Its their bill. Its not like shuttding down is way better its merely a win win for them. Its only the minority party where it makes a differnece. All previous cases where the presidency was not looking to simply tear apart the government a shutdown was bad for them but since it effectively does what trump is already doing it would not really matter much for him.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          123 months ago

          They very very very obviously don’t care if they look bad. I honestly don’t understand how you could have any other impression. They got what they wanted. Plain and simple. They made this bill so bad that it was worse than a government shutdown and Chuck Schumer still accepted it.

          • HubertManne
            link
            fedilink
            43 months ago

            I mean I made my point but will expand. Under shutdown. They furlough anyone they want. They say any bad effects are from the shutdown (democrats). Courts are powerless to say who gets furloughed because its a shutdown (as opposed to unlawful firings). After shutdown they fire furloughed people because hey they got by without them during the shutdown (even though they really didn’t). They got what they want either way but since the government is the only one challenging the illegal behavior its in some ways better with the shutdown especially when they can blame dems for it. I honestly think the shudown is preferable for them as long as they can say its not their fault.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I’m glad someone is saying this.

      While I understand people don’t want to give Trump any wins, choosing the shut the government down is the wrong hill to die on. Given the chaos that DOGE has caused, and the executive branch throwing around their power completely unchecked, shutting down the government would plunge america into chaos.

      I wouldn’t be surprised at all if Trump had a plan to frame the government shutdown as “government inefficiency” and use it to grab much more executive power.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        53 months ago

        Let the Republicans take the blame for bring it all down.

        Oh wait, you’re right. The Democrats would never blame them either.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          23 months ago

          I mean, does it really matter?

          Even if the Democrats are blaming Trump for the shutdown, what do you think would be Trump’s next move after Congress refuses to fund the government?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      93 months ago

      If a shutdown is such a win for trump, why weren’t republicans voting against cloture?

      • HubertManne
        link
        fedilink
        33 months ago

        because they would look incredibly stupid. it was their bill. also in win win scenarios it does not really matter.

    • BrikoXOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      203 months ago

      Federal courts can still operate after government shutdown. While most of their funding comes from the Congress, they have their reserve funds and others sources like fees from court document filings.

      • HubertManne
        link
        fedilink
        33 months ago

        they can operate but because of the shutdown employees have to be furloughed and they can choose anyone. when they fire someone it can be done without cause or break laws that can allow the courts to undo it but there will be little ability to undo a furlough that is because of a shutdown.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    343 months ago

    The are owned. They are responsible to what happens now. They are not for the people, they are for themselves.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    inexplicable? this is what they do. this is what they’ve done as long as I’ve been aware.

    has this woman ever met a senate dem? this should shock exactly nobody. we all knew this was who they were. that’s why nobody voted for them-the fascists would do a coup, and they would just hand over power, so what would the point have been?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I honestly feel like they did it on purpose because they know the cuts are gonna hurt rural states more, which sucks if you’re not heartless. But hey buyer beware.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    93 months ago

    Democrats are past cooked. I’m not sure it will.matter to primary these losers, I don’t think Dems will ever win a majority ever again.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    83 months ago

    I can understand that some people become afraid of Nazis and bend the knee, but these people didn’t even put up a fight.

    • The Quuuuuill
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53 months ago

      only if we’re going to get on that john brown timing we should go in with a better plan. not saying not to go in on that john brown timing. john brown and john g fee both did important things and i think they both were recuired to make forward progress and our current problem is we haven’t enough browns and we have too many fees

        • Monkey With A Shell
          link
          fedilink
          English
          33 months ago

          Interesting thought, she potentially could put Obama as VP to flip their lids as well. The 22nd amendment says ‘no person shall be elected to the office of the president more than twice’ it doesn’t explicitly preclude service by succession if the president resigned or died. Not that I’d hope anything bad for AOC but it would be funny to see the reaction.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        203 months ago

        I want her so bad as president, but I don’t know that misogynists would let it happen. I think there’s way more misogyny in this country that we expect.

        source: I’m a guy, and when they’re left to their own more than half the people I know are horrible to and about women.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        113 months ago

        That would be great, but we’d still need two progressive Democrats to primary the NY Senate seats.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          143 months ago

          Letitia James and Juumane Williams. Need to replace gov Hochul as well but I can live with nation over state.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      43 months ago

      i prefer she stayed in the house and let others to run the senate, just to keep the seats safe. probably need to start running candidates in these DINOs districts.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    53 months ago

    I’m waiting for the day that AOC is president and Lemmy starts painting her like Obama. Never good enough…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        13 months ago

        Content with saying everyone is terrible and not having any shade of difference. Content with saying everything is shameful… content that everything is genocide. Content that everything is just as bad as anything…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          53 months ago

          Content with saying everyone is terrible and not having any shade of difference.

          Content with so little difference. Content with a margin that never changes as centrists chase fascists to the right because they want to move right, with the pretext that they’ll gain republican voters by abandoning people they’ve always wanted to abandon.

          Content with second worst to fascism.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I can dig the shift and the discontent. It’s a trend that is not okay. But I do not see Obama as evidence of the wrong thing. You do what you can and when you more or less call the last great democratic president a sell out you more or less sell out an entire generation just for talking points.

            If you are saying that admin was second worst to fascism then you are telling everyone you live in hyperbole. Everything is fascism as at that point and thus fascism has no meaning any more. Everything is fascism everything is genocide and nothing has nuance… all presidents will kill you nothing matters and every vote is vote for genocide.

            More non voters sat out the last election than those voted for trump. To repeat that… for the back seats…

            People who noped out for “reasons” elected trump. They outnumbered actual trump voters. There were more non voting voters than actual trump voters….

            So keep telling everyone how shitty it is and how you’d prefer a false equivalence compared to civic participation.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              43 months ago

              But I do not see Obama as evidence of the wrong thing

              Obama would negotiate before he got to the table. It’s why the ACA started out as a Heritage Foundation proposal.

              You do what you can and when you more or less call the last great democratic president a sell out you more or less sell out an entire generation just for talking points.

              He was the last one who approached being good. All candidates since have been cynical “we’re second worst and you have to vote for us” candidates.

              If you are saying that admin was second worst to fascism then you are telling everyone you live in hyperbole.

              Obama was the last time centrists didn’t get the candidate they wanted. And unlike the progressives you hate, when centrists were faced with the prospect of not getting 100% of everything they wanted, they formed a PAC to get McCain elected.

              People who noped out for “reasons” elected trump.

              Have you ever considered not providing reasons? Have you considered that your voters expect things of you? That solidarity runs both ways? That touting the endorsement of dick cheney was a fucking mistake?

              You got 100% of everything you wanted. Including being able to blame anyone to your left for the loss your garbage pro-genocide wing of the party worked so hard to earn. Moving to the right like your wing always does has been an abject failure in two of the past 3 elections. biden only won because he lied and pretended to want progressive policy like BBB. harris didn’t even bother lying. You’ve hit a wall. How long do you have to continue losing to fascists before you admit that moving to the right has failed? Or is fascism preferable to such an admission?