It would tie in better with the email analogy, and it could show that they all just provide access to the same network.

What do you think?

  • Donald J. Musk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    01 month ago

    It’s probably too late for that now, but I do think that’s a better name

  • XNX
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 month ago

    Servers are a better word for it imo. It is what it actually is and average people already understand servers from discord

    • Donald J. Musk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 month ago

      Servers are a better word for it imo.

      Agreed. When I explain Lemmy to my friends I describe instances as “servers.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 month ago

    I like it. The reasoning’s good.

    I hate the term “instance”. It’s hopelessly geeky (it derives from object-oriented programming). It brings to mind nerds and gamers in basements.

  • confuser
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 month ago

    I agree, let’s make it more friendly to people wanting to start a fediverse provider as a business so a big company can’t come in and gobble up everyone

  • Jupiter Rowland
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 month ago

    Go ahead. Try to force that upon Friendica that has called its instances “nodes” for almost 15 years now.

    Or Hubzilla that not only calls them “hubs” but also resists any and all cultural or technological influences from anything that wasn’t created by Mike Macgirvin.

    Also <insert Morpheus here> what if I told you that (streams) and Forte call them “communities”? You know, like Lemmy’s and PieFed’s “subreddits”?

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I wouldn’t even mention anything about servers or how it works, since most anyone I would even tell about Lemmy won’t understand the technical details, nor would they care. It would only confuse them and push them away.

    Just hook them up with an instance they will fit into, and have them use the site. I really think that a lot of the other tech nerds here are overthinking it and trying to get non-tech minded people to switch by giving them technical details that do more harm and cause more confusion than simply having them use the site without knowing jack shit about it other than “it’s like Reddit but not shitty.”

    That’s really all you gotta tell most people; “it’s like Reddit (or Twitter if you’re trying to talk up Mastodon), but not shitty.”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 month ago

      I use this approach sometimes and it really works. Provided it’s the erm… simple type of crowd that doesn’t ask too many questions lol. They’ll wander around and figure it out. If they do, congratulations😂

    • irelephant [he/him]🍭OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 month ago

      Sure, but then questions like “why do these subreddits have an @ symbol?” happen, or the dreaded default “local” sort causes problems.

  • Like the wind...
    link
    fedilink
    English
    161 month ago

    I think instance is okay as a term, but defining it as a provider could be helpful. I don’t think the fediverse is that complicated anyway, it could be summarized in a paragraph for a baby

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    251 month ago

    I’m afraid that when I say „my Lemmy provider” people will think I’m referring to my drug dealer.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 month ago

    That’s fantastic. Provider avoids the mostly baseless FOMO (fear of missing out) that instance can invoke.

    I think provider more clearly communicates that the majority of the desirable content is going to be available the same through any provider.

  • Blaze (he/him)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    191 month ago

    I was thinking the same. Provider is easier to understand, and used in daily life contexts.

    • I changed my Internet provider
    • This electricity provider offers better service
    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 month ago

      Provider has the connotation of being a paid provider for services. While it’s a technically accurate analogy, I prefer the more abstract comparison of considering the fediverse a meeting place rather than a paid service since it’s a mostly volunteer and self hosted network compared to email.

      • Blaze (he/him)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 month ago

        Indeed, but unfortunately there’s no word for a volunteer provider as far as I know.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I disagree. Gmail is my email provider. I don’t pay for it. (Yeah I know they are taking ad revenue.)

        Instance is unnecessary jargon.

    • irelephant [he/him]🍭OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 month ago

      Yes, thats what I was thinking.

      I was thinking about other decentralised networks people may use, and they all seem to use the word “provider”:

      • Email provider
      • Internet provider
      • Usenet provider
      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 month ago

        That’s what resonates for me.

        We don’t have email instances, and email providers similarly block un-desired content, but there’s not a big fuss about missing out on specific types of spam. Lol.

        Similarly Internet service providers actually also block big blocks of malware providing domains, and accidentally sometimes block some great piracy resources. People who care learn to use a VPN or switch providers. Everyone else doesn’t have to think about it.

        I’ll argue that The Fediverse also carries extremely similar switching cost as an email or Internet provider. For an average user, “Let folks you care to inform know where you moved, and maybe copy over some favorite bookmarks.”

        Sure, different providers do try to bring different lenses on the same federated content, but most people aren’t served well by thinking about it on day one.

        I think shifting to the term provider is a lot more honest to the user about what to expect.

    • kubica
      link
      fedilink
      71 month ago

      How would the word be used in our context? The Fediverse provider?

      But I think I associate the word with money related activities and I’m not a fan of that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 month ago

        I associate the word with money related activities

        That’s a good thing. It costs money to provide services to people. The Fediverse is no different.

        • Nougat
          link
          fedilink
          31 month ago

          Oh god no. That’s like “I chose Burger King as my McDonald’s provider.”

          • SmokeInFog
            link
            fedilink
            English
            61 month ago

            Not really. In that metaphor it’s more like, “I chose the McDonald’s down at the corner to get my Big Mac instead of the one across town.”

            • snooggums
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 month ago

              “I can get a Whopper from McDonald’s and I don’t have to see any crap from Papa John’s because McDonalds is defederated from them.”

              Provider doesn’t make any sense when the content is coming from other places.

            • Nougat
              link
              fedilink
              21 month ago

              Yeah it’s even worse than that.

              fedia.io is a specific “provider” in this context. fedia.io runs on mbin. Lemmy is analogous to mbin. Many “providers” run on lemmy: lemmy.world, lemmy.dbzer0.com, lemmy.wtf, etc.

              What is being provided is fediverse access. “Fediverse” is not my mostest favorite term, but it’s the one that’s most accurate.

              • Blaze (he/him)
                link
                fedilink
                English
                41 month ago

                What is being provided is fediverse access. “Fediverse” is not my mostest favorite term, but it’s the one that’s most accurate.

                There’s a discussion on [email protected] about a name for Lemmy/Mbin/Piefed, as they are actually compatible. Mastodon and the others always feels a bit finicky. Feel free to contribute.

            • snooggums
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 month ago

              Fine, “I choose Burger King as my hamburger provider but I expect to be able to access a Big Mac from Burger King unless they are defederated.”

              • Blaze (he/him)
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 month ago

                “I use Vodafone as my phone provider. Can’t call people in North Korea because they cut that connection. I might have to choose another provider that still allows me to call there”.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            I mean, it’s not like that at all, but it’s ok to not care for it still. Lemmy is a federated platform, just like Pixelfed is, and Mastodon, etc. Those would be the providers in the example from before.

            Edit to add: Literally every time the word “instance” comes up in the manner noted above, it’s woth regard to a Lemmy instance, or a Mastodon instance, and rarely if ever have I noticed a reference to a “fediverse instance”. I have no clue where your comparison comes from.

            • Nougat
              link
              fedilink
              11 month ago

              Lemmy is a server application. Mastodon is a server application. Pixelfed is a server application.

              I don’t use Lemmy. Never have. And yet here I am.