Not because DDG got better, but just because google got worse.

google is still better for site-specific searches, and google scholar still has minimal AI slop

  • modifier
    link
    fedilink
    922 days ago

    It’s just as good as 2008 google, which is all I want.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2624 days ago

    “just as good”? No, I feel it is (and has been for years) vastly superior but I mostly use it to find documentation or Stack Overflow answers so consistent UI and concise summaries are high priority to me. Take that as you will

    I don’t think anybody can dethrone Google Maps yet but that’s another story

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      324 days ago

      I don’t think anybody can dethrone Google Maps

      I wonder how the whole “AI is more important than copyright” thing could play into this… Someone could totally program an “AI” map assistant right?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2424 days ago

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

    …Oh, sorry.

    Hell no. If anything, it’s gotten worse.

    In their defense, however, it’s probably largely not their fault. In my admittedly one-person-sample-size experience, 90% of the searchable Web is either Reddit threads or articles, and with Reddit going officially with Google (meaning DDG doesn’t catch as many Reddit threads as they used to), that leaves most of the searchable Web being articles. Because SEO has to ruin everything.

    So, it’s not really that DDG is shitty (mostly), but that all searches are shitty. Though, with the whole Google-and-Reddit thing, I find Google’s results are noticeably less shitty (though still shitty).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      223 days ago

      Yeah I really tried with DDG, switched my phone to it for 2 months. I was using !g so often it made the whole thing pointless.

      Google sucks, but right now nothing is better. This is why they’re able to push their AI bullshit results so heavily, because just like with YouTube, ultimately there is no real competition.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      423 days ago

      I feel the same except Google is worse due to higher number of ads in results and most SEO prioritizes Google over Bing meaning more Google results are AI spam articles.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        I feel the same except Google is worse due to higher number of ads in results

        I generally don’t see ads due to uBlock Origin. Or am I just not noticing them? Lol.

        and most SEO prioritizes Google over Bing meaning more Google results are AI spam articles.

        I will give you that. But I find that’s the case with DDG too which is why I’m having to rely more and more on search operators like site:.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          122 days ago

          I generally don’t see ads due to uBlock Origin. Or am I just not noticing them? Lol.

          I’m talking about the results as ads(paid for result ranking). Not as much a thing in DDG but google, they’re awful and you get maybe 2 results a page that aren’t paid promotion.

          Freya Holmer did a good video on AI/SEO i think touches a little on this…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      The killer for me has to be that it doesn’t support searching for phrases within websites I need. Latest example: github. I can be on the project page, copy a phrase from the code and search ddg with it in double quotemarks, and get 0 results. Copy - google.com - paste - enter - loads of results.

      Also the search function broke for about a day, a few days ago

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        To be honest with you, I didn’t even know that was a feature. (Unless I’m misunderstanding you.) Sounds cool!

        If I need to search a website, I use either Ctrl+F or the site: search engine operator.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          222 days ago

          Yes, I’m so glad that operators like site: and before: are supported. Necessary for weeding out a few bad results aha

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            222 days ago

            Yeah, I’m still salty that Google and most other search engines have cut out some of the boolean operators over the last decade or so.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        323 days ago

        That’s a bit surprising, given DDG uses Bing, Bing is Microsoft and Microsoft owns Github.

        Did you try the same search with Bing, or have an example to share?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1823 days ago

    Duckduckgo mostly uses Bing for its search results. It also uses yahoo, yandex, and it’s own crawler, but for the most part you’re getting Bing.

    So what you really want to know is if Bing is just as good as Google. If you think it is, you should definitely use ddg because they’re the least intrusive.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15 days ago

    Nah, the results are still consistently much worse imo (excluding sponsored results from Google), and I use DDG daily

  • ☂️-
    link
    fedilink
    22
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    ive been using it consistently for the past few years. it works well for me, but sometimes ill go to other engines just to see what they come up with, or when results are lacking. sometimes they are better, sometimes they are worse.

    meaning ddg is probably good enough nowadays, at least for me.

    • irelephant [he/him]🍭
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1323 days ago

      You probably already know this, but you can use search “bangs” to search other websites from ddg.

      For example, to search google, you would put !g or !google at the start of your search.

      • ☂️-
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        i do! it transformed my address bar, i sometimes use other engines through ddg now. its the main reason its my search provider.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    923 days ago

    I really tried, I set duckduckgo as the default for my second browser (I use it a lot) to slowly get used to it, but every time results are so bad I get mad and switch to Google especially for images

  • Dojan
    link
    fedilink
    1024 days ago

    Google is mostly adverts. Wouldn’t take much to be better than that.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      76% of their Q2 2024 revenue came from adverts. I’d rather pay with capitalist-consumerist shit on my screen than pay with money, but as everyone knows it’s far too invasive rn. Ergo, I use uBlock, sponsorblock and I don’t care about cookies.

    • Suite404
      link
      fedilink
      323 days ago

      I finally left Google a month or so ago and its amazing how little I miss it.

      • Dojan
        link
        fedilink
        123 days ago

        Yeah. I search for things all the time. Thousands of searches each month. I thought I’d miss it a lot, but I’ve not used Google for two years or so and it’s not really a problem.

  • venotic
    link
    fedilink
    6524 days ago

    Not really. If you focus purely on just searching, yeah DDG is decent. But, I find its maps inferior and trying to find answers to some questions can get tedious. DDG I guess is just for people who want guilt-free searching.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          223 days ago

          yes, it is. but between it and graphhopper (or osm), it’s “enough” for me.

          i don’t need a feature-filled “app” (my phone is ‘dumb’), and the only time i end up on something else like bing or google maps is if a site i need to use embeds and relies upon them.

          • The Quuuuuill
            link
            fedilink
            English
            123 days ago

            my problem with apple maps is how frequently it has something’s location completely wrong because osm addresses use the European addressing system everywhere when i don’t live in europe

            • Luc
              link
              fedilink
              123 days ago

              OpenStreetMap contributor here. What address format isn’t supported? Maybe I can help

              • The Quuuuuill
                link
                fedilink
                English
                223 days ago

                United States format is very different from the european format and often the apple maps algorithm makes some boneheaded assuptions to translate from a US address to something OSM understands. i contribute, too, but the next time i have an example of apple maps fucking up… i’ll have already forgot this convo happened, but i’ll try

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          424 days ago

          Agreed. Even if it were identical to Google maps in terms of content, it runs slower on all platforms I’ve so far tried (windows, iOS, OSX).

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          223 days ago

          ChatGPT is great for when what you’re looking for is the proper search term.
          If I don’t know what term to google, I can describe what I’m looking for and then nudge the bot in the right direction till it spits out the term.

  • Match!!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1624 days ago

    i switched from DDG to ecosia because of Lemmy and i gotta say it’s even better

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      224 days ago

      Yeah I think I’m headed in this direction. I’ve also been thinking about one of them self-hostable search engines a lot

    • Maeve
      link
      fedilink
      223 days ago

      Private browsing We protect your data and privacy so you can surf safely

      This true?

      • Maeve
        link
        fedilink
        122 days ago

        Apparently it’s not. I had to search a bit on the website so unless you just want to plant trees, which is laudable, don’t bother.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4024 days ago

    I’ve been using DDG exclusively for something like 8 years. It works great for regular text search and I use bing for image searches. I really don’t understand the reluctance of people to switch to it. To me, Google has been borderline unusable garbage for a long time.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      123 days ago

      I used it for a few years, realized that I had to use bangs every other search, and reluctantly switched back to Google. But now Google is way worse than it was, so I think I might as well try switching back again, see how it feels now.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      323 days ago

      Same here, although I don’t know how long I’ve been on DDG exactly. I never not find what I’m looking for.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        323 days ago

        I’ve actually never tried brave search. Which is kinda funny because I started using DDG when brave came out and it was the default search engine.

        What do you mean by slow though? Like just the webpage loading or the time it takes you to get good results? I’ve never noticed any load time, but I’ve always had a few tweaked content blockers running and that may affect my perspective.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      724 days ago

      Cherry on the shit sundae was a couple months ago when Google started to require JavaScript be enabled for search.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        524 days ago

        Okay, so this wasn’t just me! I installed NoScript for Chrome on my work laptop as a stop gap for no more ublock origin and thought something was fishy w/ Google’s search page.