• Disney shareholders rejected anti-DEI proposal on Thursday.
  • A conservative think tank proposed that Disney stop participating in the Corporate Equality Index.
  • Shareholders for Apple and Costco previously rejected similar proposals.
  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 month ago

    Maybe that’s because “DEI” has become code for “anything done by minorities” and “woke” now means “minorities.” With minorites here meaning “not white heterosexual men.” Also cis but these snowflakes can’t even accept that cisgender is a technical term.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    31 month ago

    Nah, fuck disney. Won’t forget their “say no gay” policy. Also, a lot of their “woke” coded content is awful. It feels written by inexperienced writers. It’s not genuine and comes across as pandering.

    Like damn bro. Timon and Pumba were gay, social outcasts and raised a child together. That shit felt real. Not the stereotype gay l, but just normal… well “normal” characters.

    The new stuff doesn’t seem to have that. To the point that it feels as though they wanted their work to flop on it.

    Kinda has that vibe Sandy from Spongebob had. At first, she was just a normal whacky character. Then Nickelodeon wanted more girl representation and Sandy became pretty much flawless. She wasn’t the butt of the joke anymore, while the other characters stayed that way. It made her seem less part of the gang. Unequal to the rest. She became unfun.

    So many of the female characters seem flawless and yet unlikable. From star wars series, to the new disney movies. Where is our Katara from Avatar? Where is our Valerie from Danny Phantom? Where are the characters with character?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    No suprise there. A large portion of Disney’s viewers are girls and minorities. You know, those dreaded DEI folk.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Well yeah they learned that more than just little white girls like their movies. Look at the animated Disney/Pixar feature films, so much more than it was in the pre- renaissance era.

      Even during the Renaissance …we had Pocahontas and Mulan and Jasmine…but these people were more like phoned-in representatives of their cultures compared to now.

      Look at Encanto, or Moana/Viana. Or Coco. Or even Soul.

      Hell, Strange World features a mixed race family with a queer son and a three-legged dog.

      And the movies are better for it. They are more relatable because they aren’t all some xeroxed copy of the same plain princess with a slightly different tint. And more importantly, they are showing their young and impressionable viewers a cast that reflects reality. That not every family is a carbon-copy “traditional” family. That different cultures exist and yeah, live a bit differently than suburban white folk (who live a shockingly similar life to the Sultan of Agrabah).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        youtube videos of disney cinema is infested with these “anti-woke comments” its really not for conservatives anyways. like how the recent snow white movie is being spammed all over youtube with anti-woke twist. they trying very hard to get people to hate disney and using the actor as thier anchor.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      and disney also have “virtue signalling” for LGBTQ+ for a couple decades already. harder to divorce from that. ALso children is thier money maker too.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    761 month ago

    Just 1% of shareholders voted to approve the proposal

    1% of shareholders, or the holders of 1% of shares?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        111 month ago

        And an easy question to answer - 1% of shares. All businesses weigh shareholder votes by number of shares held.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            41 month ago

            Yeah, but those systems still don’t count votes by “number of shareholders” as indicated above. They’re still weighted by number of shares, just some shares have more benefits than others

            The class offered to the general public often has limited or no voting rights, while the class available to founders and executives has more voting power and often provides for majority control of the company.

  • circuitfarmer
    link
    fedilink
    11 month ago

    Lots of media worried about upsetting the King of America with their reporting

  • Tony Bark
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 month ago

    “I guess you forgot whose really in charge,” said Mickey.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    151 month ago

    Probably because they realise that all the companies that ditched DEI have been doing significantly worse. Almost like it’s something people want.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 month ago

          I just compared Costco which didn’t roll back vs Target that did. In the last 3 months Costco is down 8% and Target is down 20%

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I’ve been watching the stock market since the inauguration and companies like Target have been dropping significantly faster than companies like Costco that didn’t roll it back. It’s all going down, but the anti-dei ones are going faster.

        Edit: just looked and Costco is down 8% in the last 3 months while Target is down 20%.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    301 month ago

    Conservatives have been worshipping on the altar of Shareholder Value since the 80’s.

    Guess what? These shareholders just told us all what they value. Think Conservatives will accept it?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 month ago

      I mean they value money…

      and apparently they are smart enough to realize that Diversity helps with money, Which makes sense… they are a machine designed to extract money from people…

      rich white billionares do not fill up theatres or make a substantial percentage of disney+ and Hulu subscriptions… a group of people that know how to target different demographics will obviously outperform one that targets the hell out of maga fans but doesn’t know how to talk to the other 70% of the country.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 month ago

        remember the actors that went all anti-lgbtq+ tried to make thier “anti-woke circle jerking movies” like gina carano,and some others.

    • LupusBlackfur
      link
      fedilink
      31 month ago

      worshipping on the altar of Shareholder Value since the 80’s.

      Thanks, Milton Friedman…

      🙄 🙄 🖕 🖕

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      171 month ago

      Conservative “values” are just cover stories for greed, selfishness and prejudice. They grew up with a set of prejudices and they refuse ever to reexamine them. So they adjust the “values” to suit. Conservatives are incurious, stubborn people who refuse to grow.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 month ago

      dint disney rollback some of DEI initiatives at least for a show, and introduced a “fully outed christian”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 month ago

          Democrats and Republicans are aligned on trans erasure now.

          Fucking idiot Dems think it’ll stop there I guess.

          I don’t understand why Americans aren’t marching to war against this shit, it’s taking root.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1021 month ago

    Disney wants as many customers as possible and doesn’t care about temporary optics based on hard right politics. Don’t mistake them for the good guys. Megacorps that buy up everything in sight and use their ridiculous piles of money to exert influence over politics are the core of the problem.

    Guess why copyright laws in the US kept adding decades and decades to copyright protection from the death of the creator. HINT: Megacorp money controlling laws may have been involved.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      421 month ago

      Like all corporations, Disney is a mercenary. Their allegiance lies with whoever puts the bigger number on their cheque.

      If MAGA is going to get in the way of Disney trying to make money, I’m more than happy to let Disney fight that battle and waste some cycles

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I’ve got a love/hate thing with Disney. Like…enemy-of-my-enemy-enemy kind of thing.

      I do love when they stick it to DeSantis.

      But I still ain’t going to FL anytime soon. We did Disney in 2022 and I think that’s probably near the end of when FL was tolerable (in small doses) for sane people.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      161 month ago

      While most of that is true, they actually did let the Mickey Mouse copyright expire, and Mickey as portrayed in Steamboat Willie is now public domain.

      But instead they’re using trademark. There’s a reason they’ve started using Steamboat Willie in an animated logo.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1231 month ago

    They … rejected … anti-DEI … making them … pro-DEI … and anti-Trump? Am I getting that right? Sorry, there are just getting to be a lot of double-negatives these days it’s hard to keep track.

    • Juniper (she/her) 🫐
      link
      fedilink
      31 month ago

      Call of what if is and it becomes more clear.

      DEI is diversity equity and inclusion. You know, inclusion of racial minorities, disabled people, and women in historically male dominated roles.

      Disneys board rejected enacting a Trump inspired policy of racism, sexism, and general bigotry.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Shareholders in a company whose entire business is around being well liked globally thinks it would be a bad business move to cancel a program that is part of a good public image in favor of placating a relatively small chunk of Americans that would both be paying attention and against DEI.

      They could still be pro-Trump, and not really caring about DEI, but they know the value of optics in the context of a company like Disney.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      231 month ago

      The most accurate takeaway is that the shareholders wish for Disney to continue participating in Diversity Equity and Inclusion measures.

      The enemy of your enemy is not necessarily your friend.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      91 month ago

      You are right, but also, I think it’s okay to take the small victories where they are. They shouldn’t have to be applauded for doing the bare minimum, but when this bare minimum is a big middle finger to the administration I’ll look the other way

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 month ago

          I agree, but in the right circumstances. Posting it here in the comment section is one thing, we’re discussing their actions. But some people (not you, necessarily) will take it a step further and go bully a company when they take a good step because the step wasn’t big/good enough. We gotta positively reinforce good behavior

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 month ago

          My friend, have you not been paying attention? Trump doesn’t give a shit about any of that. He’s burning all the bridges to “eradicate woke”.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 month ago

          Imagine if tomorrow they decided to stop DEI for good

          I wonder if they could point towards their secession when handling that. Technically Disneyland and world aren’t part of America, but they’re not recognized as sovereign states by any country so they might have a hard time really putting that fight up

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 month ago

              Look into “Company towns” a bit. It could be done right, but putting that into the hands of the current oligarchs would be a spell for destruction

              But I like your sentiment. I actually am planning to start a non-profit apartment complex and I’m trying to get my employer to be a primary investor. I plan on offering them a temporary exclusivity deal if they’ll let me build close enough to where we work but I’ll have to look into the laws about that. Exclusivity deals are a lil weird around housing, might not actually be able to offer that

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    21 month ago

    As someone who actually works on real stuff, it’s insane to me that for some people, they go to work and have high-level conversations revolving around things such as this.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    691 month ago

    They saw what happened to Target stocks after the boycott and said fuck that.

    Boycotts do work, keep it up