I know Gnome is the default on popular distros: Fedora, Ubuntu, Rhel, Pop OS (it’s Cosmic Desktop yes but it is still based on Gnome)…etc. But Gnome just doesnt work for me. I would pick XFCE - stable and no BS.

Before Manjaro and their cetificate shenanigan, I used to use their XFCE version. At the time, it was marketed as the “Flagship Manjaro version”. I went 4 years without any problems and I did tinker a lot, just couldnt get their XFCE to break.

After a tough Arch or Gentoo installs, I just want to put XFCE on and call it a day.

What about you guys?

  • spicy pancake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    139 days ago

    any computer I need to be stable enough for work/school: KDE

    any computer whose primary purpose is for goofing off and gaming: LXQt (and I will spend the entire time configuring LXQt instead of gaming…)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      29 days ago

      Why not use steam or arch if it’s just fucking around? Arch you can at least configure easily.

      • spicy pancake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        29 days ago

        tbh hadn’t heard of steam and always assumed arch was difficult to learn. but i had been considering trying arch just to see what the hype was about

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          29 days ago

          SteamOS is the arch Linux off shoot they made specifically for the steam deck. It’s great for integrated graphics gaming.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    99 days ago

    Plasma for the last decade. Then probably XFCE, then Cinnamon.

    I try Gnome every year or so, but every time I get pissed off with it within a few minutes and wipe it off my machine.

  • nafzib
    link
    fedilink
    128 days ago

    KDE for sure. The modern versions look exactly like how I want a desktop environment to look out of the box, and they keep the full range of customizability that a desktop should, IMO, allow it’s users to have. Which is something Windows just kept slowly getting rid of over the years.

    I also prefer to have a taskbar that is ever present with a traditional start menu that’s cleanly organized by category rather than the current full screen pop up “activities” search thing gnome does nowadays.

  • Lka1988
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Cinnamon by and far.

    I’ve used so many distros and DEs I don’t even know where to begin, but Cinnamon got me hooked for the long run. It’s legitimately the most polished and “ready to run” DE I’ve ever used, yet still allowing for far more customization than Windows ever offered.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      28 days ago

      Cinnamon’s been working well for me; I’d choose that, and I don’t mind waiting till my laptop breaks to reassess what DE I want!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    169 days ago

    My computer doesn’t really break, I’m Ship of Theseus-ing it regularly.

    Apart from that, the only one among the normal window based ones that has felt like it respects my will to configure stuff in ways that feel right to me has been KDE Plasma.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    118 days ago

    I keep coming back to KDE time and time again. It’s so easy to mess with, I can set it up exactly how I like it without much effort, and it always looks good because someone else did all the work making themes and widgets I use.

    That said, I love XFCE, I’m just trash with CSS so it takes me forever to get it how I like, and on my Surface I can’t get the scaling to work so everything is beyond tiny.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    87 days ago

    KDE plasma. Coming from 30 years of running exclusively windows it’s just the most comfortable and easy for me to use (way more than Gnome). Easily configurable, works. Can’t ask for more.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    89 days ago

    I don’t mind a little “change” every now and then, but still – “Sway” on my “potatoes” (Orange pi zero 3 and Orange pi 5 max) and “Hyprland” on my x86_64 PC.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      19 days ago

      Isn’t sway based on i3? i3 is a WM not a DE. But as sway is not X11, I’m not sure if it’s just a WM

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28 days ago

        Sway still primarily counts as a WM + Compositor, but considering it has keymaps, autostart, and libinput config mechanisms embedded in it, I would say it borders a desktop environment.

  • gonzo-rand19
    link
    fedilink
    89 days ago

    LXQt or XFCE if I have to pick a DE. Fluxbox or openbox if I can get away with just a WM. ;)