Summary

The Atlantic has published unredacted attack plans (non-paywall link) shared in a Signal group chat of senior Trump officials, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, and DNI Tulsi Gabbard.

Editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg released the full texts after officials denied sharing war plans or classified information, arguing transparency was necessary amid accusations of dishonesty.

The leaked messages detailed U.S. military strikes targeting Houthis in Yemen.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 month ago

      It’s so wild that they are very demanding of touchpoints up front but totally clueless about everything throughout the chat…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    71 month ago

    The interesting part of publishing all the texts is it only serves Trump’s plans. To tear America away from Europe and force America to find new global relationships. Interesting times we are living in.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        61 month ago

        “Won’t look good if this leaks and we don’t bomb them” is literally in the leaked chats. Journalist was added on purpose imo.

      • @[email protected]M
        link
        fedilink
        41 month ago

        I’ve had this thought in the back of my mind since learning about this. How does one accidentally add someone to a group chat?

          • @[email protected]M
            link
            fedilink
            31 month ago

            I honestly have 0 ideas as to why, but it’s just too stupid of an action to not be on purpose. I’m sure we’ll find out one day. These people aren’t very confidential and will probably blab about it on a talk show down the road.

  • That Weird Vegan
    link
    fedilink
    291 month ago

    if this were any other regime, they’d be facing jail time for using a non-approved messaging app. But this is the year of the trumptard, so they will face no consequences.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    571 month ago

    They dropped the guy’s girlfriend’s apartment building on him to kill him.

    Hope it was a townhouse and not a tower.
    The fucking disregard for human life.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1431 month ago

    My favorite quote is the one where he says it could leak lol

    “…If this leaks we look indecisive”

    Try incompetent beyond reason. This clown world is funny if people weren’t dying.

    • Lady Butterfly
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 month ago

      Of course… the main thing is how they look not what good they do. It’s unforgiveable

    • sp3ctr4l
      link
      fedilink
      English
      551 month ago

      Also this:

      Pete Hegseth, after broadly describing the big picture situation/rationale for the strike, that same block of text you pulled the ‘we look indecisive’ from:

      But, we can easily pause. And if we do, I will do all we can to enforce 100% OPSEC.

      … I don’t even know what to say.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    92
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    So thankful we avoided GeNoCiDe JoE!

    This is way better! …but then again, the world is only black or white… so maybe not. I guess the internet wanted this and so here we are.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness
      link
      fedilink
      101 month ago

      Sigh. Harris would be more competently bombing people in Yemen, so I’m happy with Trump in charge when it comes to this.

      • Tiefling IRL
        link
        fedilink
        17
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Yes, you hold some of this blood in your hands. Complaining won’t absolve you of it. Thank you for your disservice, what are you doing to help correct it?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        121 month ago

        The prevalent message is what counts.

        Kinda like saying a handful of idiots pushed a narrative about Hillary’s server. More idiots bought that line but it was started by a small group.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            151 month ago

            Why not both? It’s entirely possible to push for progressive policies while also acknowledging the role cultural influence and the internet holds…

            Easier that being an asshole really.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                61 month ago

                It’s this rhetoric that plays perfectly into the class divide that the corporate asshats want everyone to fall for. “It’s your fault for not voting for the other corporate shill party!” Disregarding the fact that the main difference is one party is just mask off, and the other is mask on fascist. As many people rightly point out, the dems are controlled opposition. If they weren’t there would literally have been much more fight and pushback from them for the four years before Trump 2.0 (especially since they knew it was coming faaar in advance) rather then the milquetoast response we got from them, this was made quite obvious by the dems moving right in many policies and stumping with Cheney of all people. If these people really gave a shit about appealing to their constituents, they would’ve listened to the damn voters. This is all beside the point as modern American voting IS NOT determined by the voting public, but much more powerful interests. If you really believed your vote was effecting something in this, or any other election in the past 20+ years, I have a bridge to sell you in the Sahara.

      • KillingTimeItself
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 month ago

        they most certainly influenced the election, whether or not they were responsible or not is a bit more complicated to answer.

        Whether or not they should’ve voted is the simplest possible answer you could give. The answer was yes, and they didn’t.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 month ago

      Wasn’t it Obama that normalized the indiscriminate use of drone strikes in civilian areas without congressional approval?

      Democrats are just more competent about their use of military action.

    • KillingTimeItself
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 month ago

      yeah thank god all those left leaning voters didn’t vote for kamala, we would be in so much worse of a position now.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      This trope if pathetic, only Americans think this way. You need an actual opposition party then, not neoliberalism. Because fascism wins either with your way of thinking.

      No politician offering universal healthcare, affordable housing, paid time off, better wages, resistance against genocide, etc. and etc. And youre mad at the voters? You see how fucked up that is?

      Blaming others and voters will keep making your situation worse and worse, until they come after you as well. You could instead use your energy to protest in various ways or to support or help to challenge and create new parties or structures.

      Keep dogging on your own citizens and youre gonna be next. Literally the playbook of Nazis. “First they came for…”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 month ago

      The Trump administration has a lot of catching up to do if they want to get even remotely close to the number of casualties and the staggering destruction caused by Genocide Joe.

  • Bakkoda
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 month ago

    I am so glad i was wrong. Props for releasing the info.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 month ago

      Props for admitting that. This world (and the current white house) could use some of that. It’s refreshing.

      • Bakkoda
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Honestly I’m enjoying overshooting the cynicism because now when I’m wrong it’s almost like it’s something good. It’s ok to be wrong, it’s just poor form to be salty about it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    41 month ago

    OK extremely explosive texts sent via signal, a no go because of security concerns and people screaming. Yeah wtf how much have you been upside down? American ISP’s and important infrastructure has been completely hacked with the Chinese for a long time (thus certainly also forwarding to Russia) and Trump has ended all attempts against what companies directly and lets the attackers continue peacefully in. Not a no go? No uprising? So if Russia and China can secretly monitor all traffic in America (so that end devices can also be infected and messages can be attacked directly even before anything is encrypted) is that absolutely ok…?

    Dafuq wtf

    • Em Adespoton
      link
      fedilink
      211 month ago

      Trump has already written it off saying “Waltz learned his lesson.”

      So now we get to see if anyone is actually willing to stand up to Trump.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness
      link
      fedilink
      21 month ago

      Do you want something to come out of this? I personally don’t want Trump (or any other US president) having an efficient war machine.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2001 month ago

    So many people talking about the fact that this leaked, and not enough are talking about what leaked.

    We have political leaders throwing up fire emoji’s over dropping a building on a terrorist, with no regard for the, what, dozens? of innocent lives that were lost in the crossfire.

    If you have to kill someone, sure, that’s a moral position we can discuss. No one should ever be celebrating it, particularly when others died in the process. But hey, they’re not Americans, so they don’t count.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 month ago

      These dumbfucks have no empathy. They will tell you empathy is weakness. In reality empathy is a social defense mechanism. If we all have empathy for each other it limits the harm we do. What they’re missing is not having it isn’t some kind of advantage, historically we are the most savage to those without empathy. It causes the mob to turn their empathy off and give in to their worst impulses. They think they’ll be the first ones in history to avoid that fate. They won’t.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 month ago

        Look at what JD “couch fucker” Vance wrote. Regarding potentially delaying the strike. He didn’t give any shits about the benefits or risks to lives, only the optics (oil prices going up), politics and his hatred for helping Europe.

        Sure, clearing the shipping lanes is “good” but it’s more helpful to Europe “gross” so that’s a tick “con” colum.

        Their “worst case scenarios” were all “it could look bad”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      341 month ago

      It’s like the confirmation of Brett Kavenau when he threw a hissy fit about how he “likes beer”…

      That in and of itself should have disqualified him. If someone isn’t capable of being even-keeled and not throwing a temper tantrum, then they shouldn’t hold the highest judicial office in the land…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        The dude cried and vowed retribution against one of the two parties in the US…and was still confirmed to the highest court in the country. Fucking wild.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      We’re talking about the same guys funded by the guy who says the ideal society is Mordor. This doesn’t surprise anyone. Everyone is expendable for the company’s machine, they wouldn’t mind targeting innocent people, let alone causing civilian casualties when targeting real terrorists.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      91 month ago

      If you have to kill someone, sure, that’s a moral position we can discuss. No one should ever be celebrating it, particularly when others died in the process

      I can think of a few deaths worth celebrating

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        There are only a few handful for whom I’d pull the trigger myself, but quite a multitude more that I would celebrate their passing with glee.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 month ago

          I just think, especially when we’re pulling the trigger ourselves, we should be sad, maybe disappointed, that it’s come to that. Bad people are still people, and while I believe they throw away their right to life when they start indescriminately revoking it from others, I don’t ever want to find myself happy to take life. I’ll be happy later, in the better world that’s been created.

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 month ago

      We have political leaders throwing up fire emoji’s over dropping a building on a terrorist, with no regard for the, what, dozens? of innocent lives that were lost in the crossfire.

      As someone who was around for “We’ll put a boot in yer ass, it’s the American way” this does not surprise me in the slightest.

    • Dr. Moose
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      They are so incredibly dishonorable it’s appalling.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness
      link
      fedilink
      81 month ago

      We have political leaders throwing up fire emoji’s over dropping a building on a terrorist, with no regard for the, what, dozens? of innocent lives that were lost in the crossfire.

      Correction: They dropped a building on a “terrorist” (read: brown person the US doesn’t like).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 month ago

        There is a reason to attack him. I don’t agree with the whole situation but shooting at cargo ships and American warships is going to get a response. I just expect the world’s most technological military to do a better job of not attacking innocent people in getting to him.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness
          link
          fedilink
          11 month ago

          I don’t agree with the whole situation but shooting at cargo ships and American warships is going to get a response

          It’s going to get a response, but that response is as immoral as the status quo it’s trying to protect.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 month ago

            It’s immoral on it’s face because of how they’re doing it is my point. There’s certainly a political philosophy discussion to be had about the underlying international system and American system, but there’s none to be had about throwing extra explosions around to “intimidate” a third country.

            • NoneOfUrBusiness
              link
              fedilink
              11 month ago

              but there’s none to be had about throwing extra explosions around to “intimidate” a third country.

              There is, and not having that discussion does nothing but help the imperial core maintain their facade of moral legitimacy even as they murder innocent people all over the world.

    • 100_kg_90_de_belin
      link
      fedilink
      31 month ago

      “If we discussed dropping a building on a terrorist we should also discuss bombing weddings, so let’s stick to using proper communication channels and following proper protocol for records”

    • KillingTimeItself
      link
      fedilink
      English
      471 month ago

      idk why anybody is surprised, seeing how the republicans operate this should be obvious as fuck

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 month ago

        No one should be surprised. We’ve seen who these people are time and time again. But we shouldn’t be so desensitized to moral bankruptcy that we completely overlook such a disgusting disregard for human life.

        • KillingTimeItself
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 month ago

          idk what to tell you anymore, i don’t care about human life lmao.

          You all ruined it for me by being so fucking stupid. Like i’m sorry, but how is a satirist supposed to live in a climate where everybody is just fucking stupid. The answer, inevitably, is benevolent disregard for human life, because clearly nobody cares about it enough to do anything about it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1641 month ago

    The Atlantic putting a paywall on this when they got the texts for free from a government handout is peak America…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      131 month ago

      JG got the texts for free but he’s probably gonna need someone watching his 6 now. And I’m pretty sure a lawyer is billing for helping them figure out how to publish the details and still avoid getting trapped into anything illegal, like naming the CIA agent.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        81 month ago

        Nah, the guilty parties already told congress nothing the texts did not contain classified material, so releasing them should be fine. It’s not like this administration would suddenly change its mind now, surely.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        161 month ago

        OP linked an archive link, and updated the post to have it.

        But I clicked it before and had the same reaction as if I opened a box labeled “dead dove”.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        321 month ago

        Exactly why I used to subscribe to the Washington Post until Bezos wiped his ass with it. I’ll have to look into subscribing to The Atlantic now.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 month ago

          I have been The Atlantic subscriber for about 5 years now. I think it has pretty great writers on staff. Their physical subscription is pretty cheap too.

        • bean
          link
          fedilink
          61 month ago

          Yeah I’m considering dumping NYT too. I heard Reuters was a better ‘investment’. Please someone tell me if that’s wrong. I don’t want to support Billionaires.

          • Logi
            link
            fedilink
            31 month ago

            Wired “has been killing it” during the ongoing soft coup, to quote my journalist wife, and we’ve replaced our WaPo subscription with that. We can never dump NYT just because of the recipes.

          • makyo
            link
            fedilink
            English
            131 month ago

            PBS and NPR are pretty decent places to put your subscription moneys

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 month ago

        This was a gift given to the Atlantic, though. I guess you gotta milk it for what it’s worth.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        41 month ago

        I’m not disagreeing in a general sense, but it’s funny to make that argument here when this info basically fell into the journalist’s lap. Very little actual journalism went into making this story possible

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          9
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          But think of how much money is going to be needed for the security detail this guy is gonna need for the foreseeable future. Or the costs of retaining legal representation to help him navigate through what is guaranteed to be an endless sea of investigations, frivilous lawsuits, etc. that the Trump administration is guaranteed to launch until something sticks.

          I wouldn’t be getting on any planes any time in the near future if I were him either.

          This story may have fallen into his lap, but it sure as hell wasn’t free.