Just looked it up and the entire first page of searches is about how ‘guys’ is masculine and insensitive to women. I disagree. I think the masculinization of the term is like an unneeded extra filter placed over ‘guy’ but the term itself is innocent. Guy Fawkes was a real person. He did something that caused him to be a symbol of the common person. There is nothing gendered about that. It’s the patriarchal culture that then assumed ‘common person’ refers to males. When I think of Guy Fawkes, it is his actions, not what’s in his pants, that is important. So, while there are many needlessly sexist and sexual phrases in English, I do not view ''Guy" as one of them and, instead, view it as a victim of the patriarchy just like you and me. It isn’t an inappropriate phrase to change or remove, it’s one to reclaim for all people; which is exactly in the spirit of the symbol of who Guy Fawkes is.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 months ago

    I think it’s pretty genderless, just because I’ve heard enough women use it about women or mixed groups. You can always use his surname instead, just update a bit to modern pronounciation, call everyone: Fuck, Fucks, Fuckers. I think that solves it.

    Calling everyone “homo” is another good one.

    Some languages like French use “ils” for mixed groups (same as male groups). But others like German use “sie” (same as “she/her”). Plurals in german, I think, usually become feminine (die Manner) - although German has many other gender-bending cases that I can’t begin to understand. I’m sure there’s lots of other languages that have a million other features/inconsistencies/expressions of patriarchal domination like this.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 months ago

    I’ve never minded being lumped into “you guys” and I’m a trans woman. But there are trans women that do mind, so I’m not gonna argue or anything if they tell me they don’t like that term.

    That being said, it does feel weird. Like having a problem with the term “mankind”… Like, I get “man” is a masculine term but nobody means “men” when they say “mankind”, you know?

  • username
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 months ago

    At the end of the day, we use language to communicate ideas to other people. So imo you should just use another word, because if a majority of people think that “guys” is not gender neutral, even though you think it is, the best thing for others to understand you better is still to use what others would consider a gender-neutral word.

    Don’t focus too much on language itself, put your focus on letting others understand you. If people are bothered by a word, just use another one, unless that word is actually necessary for what you want to communicate.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 months ago

      Be the change you want to see. If you don’t like it chose a different word, otherwise if you do work against the current/stream. Language and communication are always changing. Good luck out there!

    • Flax
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 months ago

      Only if they’re not gender neutral

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 months ago

    I agree with you in principle but in reality it’s a changed word that I’m trying to remove from my vocabulary are replace with y’all.

    • Scrubbles
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 months ago

      Yup. Agree or disagree, it’s meaning has shifted. Language is an ever evolving thing. Computer meant something different 100 years ago. We didn’t have the term fiber optic. There’s always things that change.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    92 months ago

    Guy comes from the burning of Guy Fawkes effigies on Bonfire Night. They would create these dolls of Fawkes where he was shabbily dressed and burn him for his prominent role in the Gunpowder Plot. Guy Fawkes and the gunpowder plot was not because he was an everyday man. He was trying to return the crown to being part of the Catholic church.

    Child made effigy of Guy Fawkes

    In the 19th century, the term guy was used to refer to a poorly dressed man. Eventually, his image changed as a freedom fighter and some, particularly Catholics, saw him as a hero in the 19th century.

    Guy goes back at least a millennium and was always a male name. Its hard to know for sure, but it probably was the word for wood.

    I don’t know if this unpopular, it’s just a contested opinion. Growing up, it was used either presumptively that masculity is the default or gender neutral. These debates are one way language changed. I don’t know why people care as much as they do. Society literally doesn’t fall apart because words change their meaning.

    • ✨🫐🌷🌱🌌🌠🌌🌿🪻🥭✨OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      got to the second sentence and didn’t bother reading farther lol. looks like someone had their oatmeal pooped in this morning. blocked. weird when ppl hit the internet in a rage.

      the wisdom here is: Dont let aggressive people drag you down to their level.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 months ago

    People argue too much about definitions instead of just asking the other party to clarify when they’re using a slightly different definition.

    Context is also very important.

    Reclaim all you want, while respecting people’s boundaries.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    222 months ago

    Guys will not be neutral until a man can say he fucked two guys last night and mean women.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 months ago

      Guys implies social distance. Once you’re fucking those ladies, they’re officially your bros.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 months ago

      I think the difference here, is that you’re not talking about a collective, but instead two different individuals. I agree with OP on this one, and I think “guys” can refer to a collective of humans.

      Is it right? Probably not. Do I think of just a bunch of men when someone says “come on guys”? Not really.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 months ago

        If it refers to all genders in some contexts, but only to men in others, then it isn’t gender neutral.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          It isn’t gender natural only in some cases

          Waitress is only women, but waiter can mean either.