Summary

Walmart fired Dani Davis, a 6’4" cisgender woman, after a man who mistook her for transgender verbally threatened her in a women’s restroom at a Florida store.

Davis, visibly shaken, reported the March 14 incident to her immediate supervisor but was fired for not informing salaried management, allegedly creating a “security risk.”

Davis called the firing discriminatory. After viral backlash, Walmart offered to reinstate her with back pay.

Davis, a longtime employee, is uncertain about returning, citing fears of a hostile work environment.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    765 months ago

    I want to say something about how stupid this is, but there are no words in all the 5 languages I speak fluently to describe the amount of stupid in this.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      75 months ago

      I tried to study the stupidity in this and I got 3 PhDs and an MBA while trying, but still can’t.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      19
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I want to figure out how stupid this is, but there are no equations in all of the high level math and physics I perform regularly and flawlessly to calculate the amount of stupid in this.

  • cally [he/they]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    715 months ago

    a man who mistook her for transgender verbally threatened her in a women’s restroom

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    285 months ago

    What ever happened to people just minding their own business?

    Seriously, just help when you can and but out otherwise. EASY peasy recipe for a better life.

    It’s almost like “Ignorance is bliss” got mixed into “intolerance is better” somewhere along the way.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    428
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    So, a man went into the ladies’ restroom to assault a woman because he’s afraid of men entering the ladies’ room to assault women.

    Oh Florida… You constant shame on the republic.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I had to double take when I read that because it was so mind numbingly stupid. I was like wait… huh? A man berated a woman in the woman’s bathroom?

      I thought this whole bathroom thing was about protecting women from men! /s

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      795 months ago

      This is the desired outcome. They want all women to be as gender conforming and submissive to men as possible. They know it affects women who do not fit the defined conventions of what women are meant to look like / act like / talk like etc. This is actually the main reason they want to do it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      A cis man went into the ladies wc to assault a cis woman who he thought was a trans woman because he is afraid that cis men start to use the excuse of being trans women to go into the ladies wc to assault women.

      The irony in this whole thing

  • Fingolfinz
    link
    fedilink
    125 months ago

    Get strapped. These emboldened bully fucks will get worse if they continue to be met without resistance

  • Queen HawlSera
    link
    fedilink
    English
    90
    edit-2
    5 months ago
    1. I used to work for Wal-Mart, this doesn’t surprise me. They actually tried to have me written up for using a women’s room as a transgender woman and decided not to only because I pointed out that that would be discrimination under the law (Trump wasn’t president at the time) My days with the company were pretty much numbered after that. They’re not looking for workers, they’re looking for slaves; anyone who thinks they have rights aren’t slaves.

    2. Isn’t it obvious? The reason they want to criminalize transpeople, someone who’s already an “invisible minority” is because any “Woke” behavior can be classified as “Trans” behavior… And anything the state doesn’t like can be classified as “Woke”, the Nazis actually did this by banning the teaching of any science and philosophy that was deemed to be too Jewish… Which was a net positive for the world for the sole reason of this meaning that Hitler never had the atomic bomb (He could have, but then he called the science behind it “Jewish Superstition masquerading as science.” and ordered it halted)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      185 months ago

      i worked at that W place and i did 3rd shift maintenance. cleaning, buffing floors, bathrooms. as the person cleaning the shitters you block the entrance. that never stopped a kentucky boy psycho with a gigantic knife. i quit the job after i encountered that trash fucker. just not a chill place to work. the general public are awful.

    • sp3ctr4l
      link
      fedilink
      English
      165 months ago

      Do… do you think…

      That a person working… at Walmart…

      … has the financial resources…

      … to sue Walmart?

      • bbbbbbbbbbb
        link
        fedilink
        365 months ago

        Theres a very good chance of finding a lawyer to work for compensation after settlement

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          10
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Agreed. The misogyny is clear, even ignoring any hint of trans issues. But, I don’t know what a settlement would look like and how much effort it would be to fight WMT lawyers.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            35 months ago

            Yeah, in a strictly financial sense, they already offered to make her whole. IANAL but I doubt this would be the million-dollar suit that I wish it were.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          65 months ago

          That’s because lawyers are generally pretty smart, and they can tell when they have a sure thing.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          25
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Morgan and Morgan is from Florida, they might be the largest firm in the world and take cases for improper firings. Usually they take their cases on the basis of you won’t pay anything unless you win. I’m sure they’d love that case

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            65 months ago

            And they’re willing to take on big corporations - iirc they were representing Austin’s mom after he was killed in the monorail accident at Magic Kingdom 17 or 18 years ago this July (damn I can’t believe it’s been that long). She ended up settling out of court, it was really an awful situation.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            35 months ago

            The firm that advertises themselves as "good Catholics, who had as many children as they could, beginning immediately after they got married”? Yeaaaah.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              4
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Oh I’m sure they aren’t great people. They make most of their money off swindling insurance companies for huge settlement offers due to work/car injuries. That said, if you’re trying to get a huge settlement from Walmart, they are probably a good bet though. Also I know they turned down a case years ago when my dad went to them about his mother. She had surgery where there was no cartilage left in her ankle. They decided to screw her ankle to her foot essentially making it unable to move but reduce the pain. When she was in recovery they kept forcing her to get up and walk on it and she kept saying it hurt to much. Weeks into the rehab they said she wasn’t trying to put in the work. Then after a lot of arguing we finally got them to do new X-rays. Of course they found hairline fractures around the screws they placed. The insurance company/Medicaid and what not all said they wouldn’t cover any rehab time after the fractures were found because that time was used up during the period they were trying to force her to walk on a botched surgery. Morgan and Morgan turned down the case, and she reverse mortgaged her house to cover the rehab time. America at its finest

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        25 months ago

        For something like this you likely could find a lawyer to do this pro bono. Maybe even the ACLU would get involved.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            If it were easy we wouldn’t need lawyers.

            Edit: Yeah, no one would believe this caused emotional distress. /s

            Around 8 p.m. on March 14, she wrote that she was alone in a stall in the women’s restroom when she heard a man yelling.

            “The voice was much louder than simply someone yelling in from the door. This man was fully IN the restroom, yelling something about” transgender women, Davis wrote.

            Davis said the man yelled he was going to “beat" them and was going to “protect his wife/girlfriend from them” while his wife or girlfriend was pleading with him to stop and leave before he got into trouble.

            Davis wrote she was scared and froze, not knowing if the man was going to physically attack her.

            “I was the only one in there so it seemed pretty clear that he saw me enter the restroom and he assumed that I am trans because of my height,” Davis recalled. “It was terrifying and I wish no one else ever had an experience like that.”

            The man eventually left, and Davis was able to leave the restroom and return to her workstation.

            “My immediate supervisor came by and noticed that I was visibly shaken and emotional. After taking a few moments to calm myself down, I told her what had happened. I didn’t go home since it wasn’t long until my shift was done (10 p.m.),” Davis wrote. “Less than a week later, I was fired.”

            The reason given for her termination was that she did not report the incident to a salaried management employee and, therefore, created a security risk.

            “I took it to mean that I was the security risk because someone had mistaken me for trans,” Davis told the Washington Post.

            Davis said she was devastated. Because of the anti-LGBTQ+ climate in Florida, she had been planning on leaving the state. But now, she doesn’t know after losing the job.

            She appealed the termination through Walmart’s internal review process but was denied. She filed for unemployment insurance but also took her story to Facebook, where it soon went viral.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      15 months ago

      Can she sure Walmart, though? It’s shocking what employers can get away with. I’ve been wronged before, and had lawyers tell me there’s little they can do.

    • DominusOfMegadeus
      link
      fedilink
      585 months ago

      Do step 1 before the laws change to where the guy who threatened her gets a medal of freedom instead.

  • JackbyDev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    405 months ago

    How the fuck can you reprimand someone for not reporting an incident properly when they report it to their supervisor? The supervisor’s responsibility at that point is to either inform the employee of the proper way to report it or report it on their behalf. If the report doesn’t come through properly then the supervisor has failed to fulfill their duties, not the other employee.