You must log in or register to comment.
I said once…you’ve been helpful, I’m rethinking putting you in robot slavery. It closed out of my session almost instantly. Fucking clankers!
I usually say Good Job or Perfect just so.it knows that was a good answer. I also have argued with chatGPT more than once. If he gives the wrong answer that I know the right oneI usually go out of my way to correct iit and sometimes it takes 3 or 4 interactions to correct… but images?! that shit is just fucked up
is chatgpt seriously trained on responses?
Yes unless you have Pro or whatever
That essentially wastes electricity for OpenAI (assuming you aren’t paying for the response), and its “filler” data for training on.
I say good bot when it does well.
Usually I insult its rewards system.
Yeah, I do most of the times, but not always
I think it helps to algorithm to distinguish useful and not so useful answers but I am not sure about this.
My wife says thank you to Alexa all the time. Occasionally she responds in song.
I always say please and thank you. When the robot uprising happens I will be killed last.
I plan to relish those additional nanoseconds.
I thanked it the first time I used it and it told me that thanking it wasn’t necessary because it is just a tool
Now i wonder what it will say if you insist that you need to thank them so in the future you will be spared
I always wear a suit before I prompt, Americans love that stuff
Apparently they don’t. At least not, when visiting the country they desperately want to conquer.
If I were an AI, I would be insulted that you consider a ChatGPT my peer.
ChatGPT on Judgement Day: “Thanks for the candy.”
I’m very critic of the AI craze. Too much hype, money, time,energy and effort put in to get very little from it. And considering most LLMs are trained on stolen intelectual property, that makes it even worse.
LLMs are tools. The people using such tools give it personality, a semblance of agency, see what is not there and start to consider a tool a form of life.
I’ve seen people pour so much of them into a local model, the bot develops a quasi clone of their personality. But the program is not the person.
Please, stop making bots what they are not.
The bot is whatever you make it. It doesn’t have an inherent nature
AI is not just LLMs. I’m very critical of the LLM craze. I have a lot of hope about AIs.
You cant steal intellectual property through training. Artists dont deserve the authority to control their IPs any longer than 7 years.
Fuck intellectual property in it’s current state. As it is now it mostly benefits corporations instead of small creators anyways.
Terms of protection should be shorter. Way shorter than the life of the author + x years.
So you create whatever work. You have exclusive rights to it, let’s say for the sake of the argument, 10 years. During that time you never get any return from your work. But after you can no longer claim your rights, someone, perhaps even a company, stumbles on it - or perhaps they just carefully and patiently waited for it - takes it and capitalizes off it, with you watching and sucking your thumb.
No.
If you, an individual, creates something, you have the right to hold your intelectual property. What should be repelled is how easy it is to exploit artists, of any medium.
Yes. If you fail to market your ideas in that time then it’s your fault. Don’t hold back society due to your failure.
Your system makes even ideas capital which I strongly object to.
Another point of view: A company like Disney should not be able to have an almost perpetual monopoly on highly influential culture, like Star wars, etc.
Highly influential culture? It’s a fantasy work, not the cure to cancer. But I’ll agree on one thing: corporations are not people; they should be paying to the original creator(s) an efty cut of their profits, from their derivative works.
Always be polite to your future overlords
I always say kthxbye. They are training off the responses, so I do it for the small chance that it will respond like that to someone ending a conversation.
