- 3 Posts
- 449 Comments
Backfisch? Das schmeckt voll nicht nach Pommes…
Never used a computer algebra system? Like wolfram mathematica or sage math or maple? Then we have proof assisting software like coq and smt solvers like cvc5 or Z3.
This is all software that can solve real math problems in an easy way.
Do you think the left figure depicts a christian monk? I find it hard to tell and no dates are provided.
Where do I complain “the quality” of my opponent? I am trying to understand their viewpoint with regard to non-segregated sports.
I’ve spoken to some athletes about this before – women and men – and I found the opinion that sports should be gender-segregated and that the decision of where trans-athletes should be able to participate in should depend on the specific sport in question.
In my mind good sportsmanship includes fairness and I want to figure out what is “fair” in this situation. Many reasonable people disagree in that regard I think.
Well for many winning and trying their hardest to win is the fun in sport :/
What has this to do with income? It’s also amateur leagues that would be affected.
Well if you don’t do the segregation you will find that in some sports almost no afab people will ever reach the top.
Some sports are of course worse than others in this regard.
And even if there is no physical barrier, historically male dominated sports struggle to find female athletes/players. See for example chess.
How would you solve this?
Align with or are those talking points? If so what concretely is the problematic point here?
This is still not engaging with the content itself.
How does your suggestion not lead to an echo chamber? Ideas and arguments should be considered before dismissal.
Btw I find it really strange that you talk for someone else instead of making your own statements. How do you know what that user suggested?
At the time of writing my comment I did not know about that other YouTuber and am glad I did not encounter them since.
That said I still think that video was not “hateful garbage”. While I do not agree with everything she said, I do think she makes some valid points and in other parts she represents her subjective tastes in video games.
Guilt by association is not itself a fallacy in all cases but here I think it unfair to not engage with the actual topic at all. This just furthers division instead of finding common ground.
Hmmn, never heard of QAT. What does it stand for?
Sorry, vielleicht war das mal die Bedeutung aber die Brutalität die mein Auge ausgesetzt wird wenn ich alten Sichtbeton sehe ist unbestreitbar.
I like neuralviz. It’s really funny and has a lot of continuity jokes.
Yea, reading my message back I was unnecessarily harsh. But my math checks out.
Sorry, I had a bad day…
Yes. If you fail to market your ideas in that time then it’s your fault. Don’t hold back society due to your failure.
Your system makes even ideas capital which I strongly object to.
Another point of view: A company like Disney should not be able to have an almost perpetual monopoly on highly influential culture, like Star wars, etc.
No, correctly it would be n * (n-1) * (n-2) * … * 3 * 2* 1
Or the actual recursive definition
1! = 1
n! = (n-1)! * n
Fuck intellectual property in it’s current state. As it is now it mostly benefits corporations instead of small creators anyways.
Terms of protection should be shorter. Way shorter than the life of the author + x years.
Erm. In what world do you live that the precedent in your expression is right?
In all languages and countries I know multiplication binds more strongly than addition. So what you wrote would be
n^2 - n - 2n - 3n…
Ja, das ist einfaches spielen?! Hast du als Kind nicht mit Ästen Ritter gespielt? Oder Spielfiguren in den Krieg geschickt?
Was bitte ist den mit Nerf guns usw? Kinder haben schon immer auch Gewalt in ihren spielen eingeflochten.