• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    603 months ago

    The small section of mosquitoes that bite humans actually don’t serve a critical niche like that, and just spread disease. Why the idea has been floated at sterilizing them.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    13 months ago

    How do you define “wasp” though? All Hymenoptera? All Apocrita? All Apocrita minus Apoidea and/or Formicidae? All Vespoidea (minus Formicidae?)? Only Vespidae?

    What about all the parasitic wasps? All fig trees would die and with them whole food webs. And if all the parasitic wasps that hold other organisms in check would die, this would also lead to a total disruption of so many biomes…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    993 months ago

    Ok but I still think the mosquito thing is worth a try. I’m even willing to live alongside wasps but mosquitoes gotta go!

  • ALQ
    link
    fedilink
    English
    163 months ago

    Explain humans. Checkmate, scientists!

  • MBEverding
    link
    fedilink
    13 months ago

    @fossilesque all I ask is for the specific mosquito species to go extinct that carry the dangerous version of malaria and dengue

  • CaptainBlagbird
    link
    fedilink
    English
    53 months ago

    What about ticks?

    I’m sure they somehow contribute to the stability, but I try so hard to ignore it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      83 months ago

      It’s spring (your hemisphere may vary) and time to set out tick tubes!

      Tick tubes are cardboard tubes stuffed with cotton fluff soaked in permethrin. Mice use the cotton to make nests. The permethrin kills ticks on the mice, reducing the tick load of the area. It doesn’t hurt the mice, and is much more targeted than just spraying the whole yard for insects.

  • Lad
    link
    fedilink
    English
    53 months ago

    As long as these creatures leave me the fuck alone they can stick around

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      43 months ago

      There are thousands of species of cockroach on earth, and like a dozen that can be invasive in human homes. It’s okay to kill the invasive ones, there wouldn’t be as many of them in as many places without us anyway.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    403 months ago

    How many species of birds and bats eat just mosquitoes though, or a high enough percentage that they would go extinct rather than shift to rely more on their other prey species, even if at a smaller population? And are those particular species of birds and bats worth the consequences of having mosquitoes?

    • CaptainBlagbird
      link
      fedilink
      English
      103 months ago

      Which would maybe force some other animals to change their behaviour slightly more, which in turn affects yet other species. And so the butterfly effect rolls on.

      Or it doesn’t and the system stabilises in another state. Who knows, can we actually know it with a high enough certainty or are the dependencies and behavioural guesses too complex?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        103 months ago

        I mean, has the system ever not eventually stabilized in another state? The fact that we have had extinctions, quite a lot of them even involving most species that have ever existed, and yet complex life and ecosystems still exist, would suggest that life will find a way to adapt around such a loss given time.

  • Match!!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1313 months ago

    i am under the impression that mosquitos, as an invasive species, do not fill an important ecological niche and could go extinct and be replaced by other insects

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      153 months ago

      This has been a common sentiment but it hasn’t been proven in any substantial way to my knowledge. I personally doubt it’s accurate. That’s not to say the entire ecosystem would collapse but there would likely be consequences.

      That said, the other commenter is correct that there are many introduced mosquito species that could probably be eradicated from their non-native range without major ecological harm. And the species that are the worst pests in human cities tend to be introduced, so eliminating them might significantly reduce the level of bites and disease transmission for people.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        123 months ago

        Mosquitos are a nuisance to every mammal, I think if we could talk to animals this is how it would go down

        Human: “So anyways we’ve been mulling over making the mosquito extinct, but it might have some consequences for yo…”

        Mammals: “WTF BRO YOU COULD HAVE DONE THAT THE ENTIRE TIME! WHY TF ARE YOU STILL HERE GET RID OF THOSE FUCKERS!”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Yeah I mean the ethics of how humans relate to wild mammals are so complicated and confusing that I’m not even going to go there.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          103 months ago

          TBF humans historically have been pretty lax in doing anything simply because it was a good thing to do

  • Mossy Feathers (She/Her)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    93 months ago

    There are many types of mosquitoes, but only a few suck blood. It’s the bloodsuckers they’re talking about when they say no one would miss them.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    93 months ago

    I can tolerate most pests, even cockroaches, but I draw the line at bedbugs. Don’t care if they have any purpose, just fuck them

  • don
    link
    fedilink
    English
    33 months ago

    The sun has a purpose, and it can easily kill you. Merely having a purpose doesn’t make that purpose useful or without dangers.