Summary

Elon Musk gave away two $1 million checks in Wisconsin ahead of a key state Supreme Court election, prompting backlash after one winner was revealed as Nicholas Jacobs, chair of the Wisconsin College Republicans.

Critics called the giveaway “rigged,” fueling suspicion about Musk’s political motives.

Though Musk claimed the money wasn’t tied to voting, his deleted post initially suggested it rewarded voters. Wisconsin law bans vote-motivating payments.

Musk has invested nearly $20 million to support conservative candidate Brad Schimel.

  • Bakkoda
    link
    fedilink
    English
    815 days ago

    Shitty and totally legal. Slaps something So much fuckin freedom in this baby.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      815 days ago

      Or maybe its money and we should get rid of it and just work for the pleasure of it and get everything we need for free :|

      sorry… my repressed communist soul came out, I’ll repress it back in.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    53
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    The USA would need a reformation and political purge after Trump to become a first world democratic country again. And put a lot of these motherfuckers into prison for life via special tribunals. Including half the supreme court lol

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      20
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      Yeah. At this point nothing short of an armed revolutionary takeover is gonna cause anything to move back. And that’s not happening either.

      There is no “becoming a first world democracy again”. That ship has sailed. Fascism doesn’t have term limits. And we are in the thick of it now.

      I think one thing the rest of the “first world democracies” missing is that the imperial core doesn’t just go Fascist alone. It drages the rest of you down with it. Dont get comfortable watching from a distance and shaking your head at the “silly Americans”. Your democracy’s are next.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        615 days ago

        We don’t need back, we need forward, and a lot of us aren’t interested in giving into doomerism. It is still the time for peaceful resistance and that might still work. It might not, and if it doesn’t the time for widespread destruction of property and civil disobedience will come and that might work, and then soon after the time for armed resistance will come and that might work. If it all fails we can at least make them hurt and show the world that we don’t take fascism lying down. It’s dark times but we don’t get out of them by giving up.

        Hell, there’s a chance we come out of this better than we were before, and not just because the bar is so fucking low. We (americans) might find our passion for liberty and justice again and we might find our courage and we might express our decades of resentment against the creeping in of inequality by swinging to the left with new and more inclusive rights and protections for working class people. That’d be nice but even if we can’t have a good ending it’s still the right thing to do to fight fascism with everything we have.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        815 days ago

        As always America is at forefront of the world, and where the USA leads Europe will follow! 😒

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          115 days ago

          Think of it less about nation states and more about where the concentration of capital is and it makes a lot more sense.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            115 days ago

            I think by now it’s mostly driven by social media which is international in algorithm, access to influence and partly in content. Or useful propaganda is repackaged by european politicians and influences. Monkey see monkey do. And we only have 3 international news agencies, so only really 3 news papers.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1315 days ago

      Not going to happen without a lot of blood unfortunately, they already have too much power. America is heading to civil war.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    416 days ago

    It’s not a lottery. They just pick the winner based on their alignment with their values so the can use that person in their political aspirations. That’s what happened in previous “giveaways”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1615 days ago

    I guess it’s technically not bribery if you only defrauded people into thinking they were going to receive a bribe. /s

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      816 days ago

      Not necessarily a brag when it’s blatantly obvious, it’s like saying I told you the sun would rise tomorrow. Lol

    • NigahigaYT
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      Wasn’t this always known? Musk’s defense when he was sued for this in the 24 pres election was that it specifically wasn’t a lottery system and that the winner isn’t random but is vetted and picked before announcement, which is evidently legal.

      E: Source

      Quote:

      In court Monday, Musk’s lawyers acknowledged that the super PAC isn’t picking winners “by chance.”

      “There is no prize to be won,” Musk lawyer Chris Gober said, and the winners “are not chosen by chance.” Therefore, it is not a lottery, Gober argued.

      Instead, Gober said the so-called “prize” is actually compensation for serving as a spokesperson for the super PAC – and the recipients of the $1 million “are selected based on their suitability to serve as spokesperson for America PAC.” They “earn” the million dollars as payment for their work.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3916 days ago

        I feel like implying it’s a lottery that you can win should still be seriously punished but then I remember which reality we’re in and that nothing matters if you’re rich

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1916 days ago

          You can do whatever the fuck you want, as long as you have an expensive enough lawyer who will “correct” you, when people point out what you’re doing is illegal.

          It’s by design though. None of this is because of loopholes. What is happening is because the people in power wanted it to be possible.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      80
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      It is unquestionably illegal. For your reference, here are the pertinent Wisconsin Bribery Statutes.

      This leaves me to question how much the various judges that allowed this to proceed were payed paid to ignore the laws as written. Assuming it wasn’t just fear of reprisal from MAGA terrorists that kept them from stopping it.

      • Chris
        link
        fedilink
        8
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        Might not be the judges yet. A prosecutor has to charge them first. Then a judge can ignore it

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1915 days ago

          The WI AG went to court to block him from doing the give away and the judge said no. He then appealed that and the appeals court refused to stop it. He then went to the WI Supreme Court who also refused to stop it. Judges have already been ignoring it.

      • SeeMarkFly
        link
        fedilink
        English
        116 days ago

        Think of it like this. His money is so dirty that here is an argument as to whether it is safe for humans.

      • Pennomi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1216 days ago

        But legality hardly matters for the rich

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          9
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          The laws written down are merely the highwater mark of how democratic a society is in theory, or they are the lowwater mark of what the ruling class has been allowed to get away with in public in terms of brutally oppressing the lower classes, but they never represent a true accountability of the rich, merely a record of the struggle between the ruling class and the rest of society, a reading of the balance of scales at any given moment that the rich no matter what can still bat away ildly like an annoying fly in their face unless we take the fundamental issues with capitalism and wealth inequality seriously.

    • djsoren19
      link
      fedilink
      English
      316 days ago

      The rule of law in the United States collapsed a long time ago, and at this point only exists to enforce violence on poors.