• Fair Fairy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 month ago

      Do people not realize there is no US Russia trade so tariffs would be moot.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        10
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        no US Russia trade

        U.S. total goods trade with Russia were an estimated $3.5 billion in 2024. U.S. goods exports to Russia in 2024 were $526.1 million, down 12.3 percent ($73.5 million) from 2023. U.S. goods imports from Russia totaled $3.0 billion in 2024, down 34.2 percent ($1.6 billion) from 2023. The U.S. goods trade deficit with Russia was $2.5 billion in 2024, a 37.5 percent decrease ($1.5 billion) over 2023.

        https://ustr.gov/countries-regions/europe-middle-east/russia-and-eurasia/russia

        But what’s a few billion between friends?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Is … Is the US trading with Russia?

    Edit: pretty much no. Dumb rage bait article

    Double edit: fuck you, lemmy

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 month ago

      Yeah if I were being charitable I might imagine they aren’t on the list because they are already subject to extremely high tarrifs and embargoes. Maybe increased those tarrifs could be a bargaining chip in ending the Ukraine invasion. Impossible to tell with Trump though.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      201 month ago

      https://ustr.gov/countries-regions/europe-middle-east/russia-and-eurasia/russia

      U.S. total goods trade with Russia were an estimated $3.5 billion in 2024. U.S. goods exports to Russia in 2024 were $526.1 million, down 12.3 percent ($73.5 million) from 2023. U.S. goods imports from Russia totaled $3.0 billion in 2024, down 34.2 percent ($1.6 billion) from 2023. The U.S. goods trade deficit with Russia was $2.5 billion in 2024, a 37.5 percent decrease ($1.5 billion) over 2023.

  • spirinolas
    link
    fedilink
    English
    97
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Uh? Of course he isn’t. Why would Putin tell him to put tariffs on himself? That makes no sense.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 month ago

      The US has been sanctioning Russia for the better part of the last decade. We aren’t tariffing them because we aren’t trading with them.

      We also aren’t tariffing Venezuela, Cuba, or North Korea, for the same reasons.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        331 month ago

        Maybe, but apparently we’re tariffing multiple uninhabited islands. It would seem that active trade is not a perquisite for tariffs these days. can’t be having people move out there and not getting tariffed in the future.

        I hope he puts tariffs on Mars next. Maybe after he falls out with musk.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          131 month ago

          I was under the impression that we (in Canada) get our vodka mostly from Finland, but it’s been a while since I worked as an alcohol purveyor… I’m ashamed of the things I did during those years, but I’m in recovery now, thank you for your concern

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          121 month ago

          https://www.statista.com/statistics/1306859/us-imports-by-commodity-from-russia/

          It does look like we import about $3B/year. Mostly fertilizers, which make up 1/3 of total imports, and some raw metals and a bit of heavy machinery. But that’s minuscule beside our trade balances with the top of his tariff list - China, the EU, Vietnam, Taiwan, Japan, and India. We do $20B/year with tiny little South Korea, as a point of comparison. We bring in $6B/year from South Africa.

          To my knowledge, we don’t import Russian vodka in any significant quantity. Anything “Russian” branded is typically imported from one of the neighboring states - Ukraine, Belarus, Poland, Romania. Red Army Vodka, for instance, is from a Polish company.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        it’s funny that this is being downvoted. lemmy is basically reddit. rooting for the good guys, but also dogshit stupid

        • Brumefey
          link
          fedilink
          English
          141 month ago

          Downvoted because it’s wrong : We aren’t tariffing them because we aren’t trading with them.

          So are some inhabited islands which are hit by tariffs. Maybe the dogshit stupid is the one not seeing the ties between trump and putin.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 month ago

          Systems that have voting mechanisms result in hive minds. It’s an inevitable result.

          1st someone is much more likely to vote something up or down depending on how positive / negative it is. So it snowballs sort of like compounding interest

          2nd the simplest most common denominator takes bubble to the top. Precisely because more people can understand and therefore vote.

          It’s why you’ll always see some screenshot of Twitter much higher than a long in depth article. Even though the article has infinitely more value.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        161 month ago

        But tarrif on seals in the Antarctica region? Doesn’t seem like logic is driving any of this.

    • franpoli
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 month ago

      And Putin isn’t a U.S. asset? While both countries are geopolitical adversaries, their military and strategic moves have ironically helped sustain each other’s defense industries; just not in a cooperative way.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 month ago

      US is the richest country in the world and the one with the largest and most advanced army. To me it sound quite unlikely to believe that the president of USA is controlled by russia (a country that is 10 times less rich).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        121 month ago

        I’m not sure what the things you say have to do with anything? Trump is an individual who got voted into the presidency largely thanks to social media manipulation, which is known to often originate from Russian bot and troll farms. There’s no reason to believe the USA being rich (which only means a few individuals and corporations are very rich, btw) or having the largest army could have prevented it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 month ago

          social media manipulation

          Biggest social media are all owned by private american corporations in bed with the government. Same as before to me it doesn’t sound much likely that the russian government can successfully manipulate them.

          There’s no reason to believe the USA being rich (which only means a few individuals and corporations are very rich, btw) or having the largest army could have prevented it.

          Having the largest army doesn’t mean they have more guys running around in a field. USA has the most technological advanced army in the world, they have the biggest mass surveillance network, more military facilities around the world, more satellites in orbit and they top everyone else in cyberwarfare.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Embracing the Ultra-Nationalist Paleocon wing of the Republican Party and stuffing your administration with goldbugs and Silicon Valley anarcho-capitalists?

      Why does an American President consuming American Propaganda and regurgitating a uniquely American public policy at the behest of his wealthiest American peers and hooting white-nationalist proles waving American flags get flagged as Russian?

  • HubertManne
    link
    fedilink
    English
    171 month ago

    I was noticing this as well. The place that should have the highest tarrifs.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    311 month ago

    I try to keep a sense of perspective, every president I disagree with seems to be the worst president ever at the time.

    I really want to say Bush’s useless Trillion dollar wars are worse than this.

    But it’s close and we have 3.5 more years of this.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        As much as I despise Obama for vastly expanding our extrajudicial drone strike policy… All things put into perspective, yeah he was pretty decent.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 month ago

          Yes but look at the people who becomes US presidents. The bar needs to be low or none of them can reach it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 month ago

        Obama was pretty decent no?

        How Obama Destroyed Black Wealth

        Neil Barofsky, the bailout inspector general, later testified that protecting the banks was the actual goal. The administration’s aim was to “foam the runway” for the banks, as Barofsky witnessed Tim Geithner tell Elizabeth Warren. HAMP failed, in other words, because it was not designed to help homeowners.

        As a result, in many cases HAMP actively enabled foreclosure. Its re-default rate — the fraction of people who got a modification and later defaulted out of the program — was 22 percent as of 2013. Only about $15 billion of the original $75 billion appropriation was spent by mid-2016.

        Out of an initial promised 4 million mortgage modifications — itself a drastic underestimate — by the end of 2016 only 2.7 million had even been started. Out of that number, only 1.7 million made it to permanent modification, and of those, 558,000 eventually washed out of the program.

        Former Wells Fargo employees later testified that the bank deliberately tricked middle-class black families (who they called “mud people”) into subprime “ghetto loans.” Overall, a Center for Responsible Lending study found that from 2004 to 2008, 6.2 percent of white borrowers with a credit score of 660 and up got subprime mortgages, while 19.3 percent of such Latino borrowers and 21.4 percent of black borrowers did.

        The effects of the foreclosure disaster are starkly apparent in Survey of Consumer Finances data. To start, the homeownership national rate shows a marked decline over almost the whole Obama presidency, reaching the lowest rate since 1965 (before slightly rebounding).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        10
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I was fine with like 80% of Obama and like 60% of Clinton’s actual policies while enjoying the economy that I don’t credit him for. But then W Bush was like a 10% and Trump 1 maybe 15% (Warp Speed, passing the vast majority of Covid stimulus, ironically all the stuff he’s against now) and I’m batting zero so far on Trump 2 but I assume at some point he’ll do something I agree with.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 month ago

          The only possibility of me agreeing with this old fuck is him stepping down as President… But then we would have to deal with a Vance Presidency and I’m not sure that would be better

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 month ago

      I really want to say Bush’s useless Trillion dollar wars are worse than this.

      I would say Bush’s bailout of the O&G sector in '01 and the Financial Sector in '08 laid the seeds for worse social and ecological conditions over the subsequent two decades. Similarly, NAFTA and the subsequent midwestern de-industrialization was nightmarish for US industry and Mexican agriculture.

      These blunders set us up to need international trade. What’s crazy about Trump’s tariffs is that he’s not addressing the underlying infrastructure problems or the crushing post-Great Recession debt traps. He’s just squeezing at the point of the supply chain in order to punish American industry and labor for adapting to the sabotaged economic landscape of the neoliberal era.

      It is the economic equivalent of kicking a guy in the kidneys after he’s already been laid out on the ground.

    • Ye be warned 🏴‍☠️
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 month ago

      US imported $3.2 billion in goods and exported $595 million. Trade deficit of 2.7 billion Syria, Iran, Venezuela (according to Forbes) were tariffed - despite being already sanctioned.

    • Optional
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 month ago

      Sure thing, let’s just go to the unredacted Mueller Rep- AW GODDAMMIT