Each of these reads like an extremely horny and angry man yelling their basest desires at Pornhub’s search function.

  • ivanafterall
    link
    fedilink
    492 years ago

    So I checked and nobody has put AI porn of me up for sale, yet. What the fuck, guys? Am I not desirable enough for you!?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    79
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I’m unconvinced by this attempt to create a moral panic. IMO nothing here is shocking or offensive once I remember that people could already use their imaginations to picture celebrities naked.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 years ago

      The main issue of this would be public defamation, i.e. wrongfully portraying someone as porn actor which might destroy their career. You cant really do that with written or drawn fiction.

      But for that the pictures would have to be photorealistic, which is not the case just yet. But the tech is going to improve plus the generated images could be further manipulated (i.e. add blur/noise to the image to make it look like a bad phone picture).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        272 years ago

        Once the ability to make photo-realistic images like that becomes commonplace, those images won’t be evidence of anything anymore. Now I can tell you a story about how I had sex with a celebrity, and you won’t believe me because you know I easily could have made it all up. In the future I will be able to show you a 100% realistic video of me having sex with a celebrity, and you won’t believe me because you’ll know that I easily could have made it all up.

        • Savaran
          link
          fedilink
          English
          92 years ago

          The obvious thing is that at some point any camera worth it’s salt will have a nice embedded key that it signs it’s output traceable to a vendor’s CA at the least. No signature, the image would be considered fake.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            72 years ago

            As a programmer, I gotta say, that’s probably not technically feasible in a sensible way.

            Every camera has got to have an embedded key, and if any one of them leaks, the system becomes worthless.

            • Turun
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              No, that would actually be feasible with enough effort.

              The real question is what do you do if someone takes a screenshot of that image? Since the picture must be in a format that can be shown, nothing is stopping people from writing software that just strips the authentication from the camera file.

              Edit: misread the problem. You need to get a private key to make forgeries and be able to say “no look, this was taken with a camera”. Stripping the signature from photographs is the opposite of what we want here.

              • Savaran
                link
                fedilink
                English
                22 years ago

                The point is, without the signature then there’s plausible deniability that it wasn’t real. If you want to prove something happened, then it should have a signature and be validated.

                If someone is showing off a screenshot of an image then in the future (now really) one probably needs to assume it’s fake unless there’s some overriding proof otherwise.

          • tal
            link
            fedilink
            8
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Yeah, I think that there may be something like that – the ability to prove things with a camera is useful – but it’s gonna be more-complicated than just that. It’s consumer hardware. If you just do that, someone is gonna figure out how to extract the keys on at least one model and then you can forge authenticated images with it.

          • P03 Locke
            link
            fedilink
            English
            112 years ago

            Good. Fame is overrated, anyway. Let’s praise the era where no one person is completely dominating the cultural zeitgeist, and people are talking about their own indie discoveries they found, that algorithms and bots recommended them.

            Shit, Spotify’s discovery systems are so good that we’re almost there with the music industry.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 years ago

      I kind of get what you’re saying, but it’s also definitely not the same as imagination. It’s vivid, almost real, shareable, and permanent. Imagine if someone generated an AI image of you doing something you consider embarrassing or compromising and sent it to your coworkers or family.

      That said, I don’t think there’s much to be done about it. This isn’t containable.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        To be fair, if compared to imagining something, sharing something like that with one’s family would be similar to spreading rumors verbally, leading to others imagining the same thing. Which while certainly something that happens, is also behavior we already recognize as extremely rude, sometimes illegally so

    • Narrrz
      link
      fedilink
      362 years ago

      it’s not like celeb porn fakes are anything new, anyway.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      already use their imaginations to picture celebrities naked.

      Speak for yourself. Some of us can’t do that.

    • ahornsirup
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      The difference is that the images AIs spit out are, well, real. Imagining someone naked doesn’t produce a potentially very convincing actual image that can be shared.

      I do think that AI can’t really be effectively regulated (my fucking laptop can run Stable Diffusion), but that doesn’t mean that there’s no need for a debate.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    422 years ago

    Ethics of AI porn aside, can we talk about the Pornhub search function and how shit it is?

      • tal
        link
        fedilink
        142 years ago

        Arguably a good application for AI image-to-prompt functionality, I suppose.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      The trick is finding your preferred channels and just browsing those. I have a handful of channels I will happily browse for myself and a couple of channels for me and my wife to browse together.

      Searching hasn’t really been worth anything for quite a while. I’m more likely to find something I like by clicking a previous video that was enjoyed and scrolling through the related ones.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    222 years ago

    Like I’ve been saying for years, AI doesn’t need to be sentient to royally fuck society. Just needs to be good enough to mimic you and ruin your life or take your job.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      AI can have my job. It’s eyes will hurt within a week and it will be taking mental health days.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        102 years ago

        I’d love to give AI my job, but then I’d be homeless.

        I should clarify that I’m not against AI as a technology. I’m against it making me poor

          • tal
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            AI will also solve the housing affordability crisis too so you won’t need to worry about that…right?!?

            I mean, realistically, I do expect someone to put together a viable robotic house-construction robot at some point.

            https://www.homelight.com/blog/buyer-how-much-does-it-cost-to-build-a-house/

            A rough breakdown of the overall costs of building a home will look like this:

            Labor: 40%

            Also, I’d bet that it cuts into materials cost, because you don’t need to provide the material in a form convenient for a human to handle.

            I’ve seen people creating habitations with large-scale 3d printers, but that’s not really a practical solution. It’s just mechanically-simple, so easier to make the robot.

            I don’t know if it needs to use what we’d think of as AI today to do that. Maybe it will, if that’s a way to solve some problems conveniently. But I do think that automating house construction will happen at some point in time.

    • tal
      link
      fedilink
      102 years ago

      or take your job.

      The unemployment line there makes for quite the mental image.

      The “Erect Horse Penis - Concept LoRA,” an image generating AI model that instantly produces images of women with erect horse penises as their genitalia, has been downloaded 16,000 times, and has an average score of five out of five stars, despite criticism from users.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    302 years ago

    I’ll just leave this here:

    Automatic1111, depthmap script, image to image, click Left-right stereogram for vr or red-blue if you have old 3d glasses.

  • Altima NEO
    link
    fedilink
    English
    122 years ago

    Brb, firing up stable diffusion and at least 4 LORAs

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    232 years ago

    Ha, the image description just says “An AI-generated woman found on CivitAI” even though that’s clearly the character Power from Chainsaw Man.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      It’s clearly Barack Obama from the classical motion picture, Sharknado 4.

      It’s like we’re looking at two completely different images.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 years ago

    There is porn on the internet! Give them the Pulitzer Prize! Nice research. You can order these on Fiverr and they do not even have NSFW filters.