• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      353 months ago
      • Outlook (newest)
      • Outlook (even newester)
      • Outlook (okay, for real, actually the last one, we promise)
      • Outlook (okay, just one more, this time we fixed all the bugs)
      • Outlook (okay, so turns out a few people decided to take the last versions name as a challenge and they kinda a little bit deleted our production server, but we plugged that hole, so should be fine now)
  • toofpic
    link
    fedilink
    1113 months ago

    Outlook (new) (a webversion in a wrapper, so it only has half of the functions, but they force you to use it while planning to deprecate the proper version)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      43
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      But it comes with new features too, like an ad at the top of your message list every time you open it! We should consider ourselves lucky that they’re giving this to us for free!

      /s

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        183 months ago

        The moment they made me jump through hoops to use the old mail app instead of using the one with ads is the moment I switched to thunderbird.

        I plan to switch to Linux but I am very busy right now and installing a new OS onto my PC isn’t something I can do.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      233 months ago

      Except the Windows version of Outlook (New) doesn’t work with all of their data centers - but the web version and Mac version do - because they didn’t fully write out the authentication framework for high security tenants so you’re forced to use Outlook (Classic) until they “eventually” update it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        63 months ago

        Honestly, bring back waterfall development cycles…

        They we awful and failed a lot, by at least we didn’t have zombie failures being used!

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            23 months ago

            That’s a great point , but even the degenerates in the windows and office teams make an absolute mess of things and tend to prioritize BS cosmetic changes over actual improvements as a result

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      23 months ago

      Why does it matter if it’s a web version, if all mail messages today are HTML anyway?

      It’s actually the only program on the desktop that have valid reasons to be web-based.

      • toofpic
        link
        fedilink
        23 months ago

        It matters, because it’s not about messages, it’s about the interface and all the logic which was built over a long period of time. Having an OS-native gui is better because it’s faster, it’s “already there” and not just loads, and it’s all done in the desktop app already.
        As a good comparison - what would you choose for any service on your smartphone - an app or a really nice mobile website?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    283 months ago

    Think that pisses me off the most is how you can’t uninstall it. First of all, I don’t even really need a mail app on my computer. If I do, I’ll install one I actually want to use.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Look I hate windows too but every app featured here can be uninstalled. The real shame is you can’t add a signature to meeting invites correctly unless you copy/paste won’t manually, focused inbox, you can’t move a message to a different folder from the message view pop up, as far as I know the add-on center is gone and so is the VBA scripting, its just garbage and Outlook Classic (hey MS look thats how you rename shit) was actually decent. Thunderbird is superior to both tho.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    163 months ago

    FFS Microsoft, just put out a functional OS. I even really liked the Windows 11 Beta/RC, but what it became once commercialized got me to switch to Fedora on my main PC and swear off getting another Surface.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            They are both fine. There are two big differences between these two:

            • Debian is community based.
            • Fedora is maintained by both - Red Hat (subsidiary of IBM) and its community (The Fedora Project).

            They also use different package managers (Debian - dpkg/apt, Fedora - rpm) and regular Debian releases are generally considered more stable and ‘outdated’ (but I don’t like that term) since Fedora versions are released much more regularly.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                I have never used Fedora, but Debian is very stable, or at least as long as you don’t need to use proprietary Nvidia drivers, since I have occasional desktop freezes with them on KDE Desktop (on Wayland).

                Anyway, if you are new to Linux I’d recommend to use Linux Mint instead of Debian, since it’s much easier to install and use, and it is already built on top of solid base of Ubuntu which itself is Debian-based. It theoretically is not as stable, but realistically you shouldn’t come to any issues.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  23 months ago

                  I need to use those drivers since I’m an avid gamer, so maybe Debian isn’t the right one for me. I’ll look into Mint. I’m not entirely new to the space, I’ve configured headless raspberry pi’s and have a little home server, but I’m new to using it as a desktop environment.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    26
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    My team at work is always confused when I ask if they’re using Outlook or New Outlook (new) New

    • ivanafterall ☑️
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33 months ago

      Did you say Teams at work? Did you mean New Teams or Classic Teams? Did you want to swich back to Old Teams or stick with Current Teams? Or did you mean the Teams feature within Teams?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        23 months ago

        Clearly I meant the personal Teams app that they couldn’t log into with their work 365 account so they used the create account feature to log in with their personal Gmail account, and are now fuming because they can’t find work files.

  • NegativeNull
    link
    fedilink
    English
    36
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    What about the inevitable (based on years of development experience):
    Outlook (new) New - Final - 2025-04-17 - THIS IS THE ONE.lnk

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      13 months ago

      Oof hell desk, yea I left that behind as fast as I could. It was nice and all being chill not worrying about budgets, policies, “IT business alignment” and such

      But god damn if I had to deal with Beatrice’s weekly hour+ password reset call one more time I was going to lose it lol