• Teknikal
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I think the Chinese Mach 10 Yj-21 hypersonic missile should send pretty much any carrier group to hell if they have 2 or 3 of the type 055 destroyers launching them at once.

    Given any carrier battles probably happening in the Tawain strait I’d expect the land based and fighter based missiles would be launched as well so yeah I give the US really no chance of winning that one as things stand.

    I think the US badly needs the same type of missile but they seem to be only getting failures, I read earlier in the week they’d cancelled another (Halo).

    Don’t get me wrong I’m sure the US could launch enough of their own LRASMs (stealth anti ship missile) to do some damage back but they’d likely not survive to see the result or get that many planes airborne to launch them.

  • thedruid
    link
    fedilink
    English
    963 months ago

    How the hell would this guy know? He’s not qualified to run a game of RISK much less comment on anything that really involves defense

    • dustycups
      link
      fedilink
      English
      483 months ago

      What do you mean? This is the secretary of defence, a highly qualified post that…
      …oh, oh no. Wow, you guys have problems.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        53 months ago

        But, you see, he looks like a secretary of defense, so therefore he must be an excellent one!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        123 months ago

        I can’t even keep track of which positions have the dumbest trump appointments. They’re pretty much everywhere at this point.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          43 months ago

          Can we do a competition? I thought Tulsi would’ve been hard to beat, but Walz came from behind in the signal chat incident.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    173
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    From now on you must view all of their words and actions through the lens of a fascist dictatorship. This is almost certainly propaganda intended to increase fear of Chinese supremacy and using that fear as an excuse to invade Panama.

    I hard doubt the US doesn’t have classified hypersonic missile tech, and even if they don’t, this admin won’t stop maintaining, building, or deploying these “vulnerable” billion dollar aircraft carriers. Everything conservatives and DOGE cut is everything that benefits the working class, and increases their quality of life and economic mobility. They never cut anything that enables their authoritarian capabilities.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      423 months ago

      Don’t forget how they were able to slap a basically poor-only tax with their tariff bullshit.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Propaganda can be true sometimes. That the cutting edge of missile tech has been well ahead of the cutting edge of missile defense has been an open secret for at least a decade. It might not be as fast as twenty minutes, but the truth is there is nothing that anybody can do about the most advanced missiles being made today apart from hoping that they miss. The problem with carriers is that they are big, slow targets. Every carrier has this problem, not just the US fleet.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        93 months ago

        Weren’t there some wargames a few decades ago where some group playing the “terrorists” sank a US carrier with nothing but a few speedboats and some RPGs or something similar? I am thinking of the one where they “rolled back” the wargame. It has been quite a while since I read that so I don’t remember all the details.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 months ago

            Wasn’t turned on because the fleet was forced to stay too close to shore and commercial shipping lanes by the exercise.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 months ago

          Ripper declared his speedboats were armed with anti ship missiles. Which were bigger than the speedboats.

        • Buelldozer
          link
          fedilink
          English
          143 months ago

          Millennium Challenge 2002. That was a boondoggle. Yes the opposing force won and they had to reset the game but the OPFOR was up to some ridiculous shenanigans. For instance instead of using radios, which could be intercepted and tracked, they used motorcycles to convey messages…motorcycles that could travel at the speed of light.

          Another piece of silliness is that there were commercial vessels (non-combatants) on the virtual water but OPFOR sometimes used them in ways that were impossible. As an example radar would return a 12 foot fishing boat and then that boat would launch four 20 foot long anti-ship missiles.

          Then there’s whole idea of a CBG just hanging around shore for days on end staying inside a pre-determined box so that OPFOR always knew their location, something that almost certainly not happen in an IRL conflict.

          The Commander of the Opposing Force was extremely clever but they needed a long list of nearly impossible to achieve advantages to make it work.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        there is nothing that anybody can do about the most advanced missiles being made today apart from hoping that they miss

        You can help them miss. If they’re using GPS navigation, jamming works. It then reverts to inertial navigation though, so the longer you jam - the bigger the error.

        Or you could try shooting it down, I doubt they can even dodge a head-on intercept without losing a load of energy.

        edit: btw the problem you’re describing is why cbg is a thing

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      83 months ago

      I mean, carriers in this modern age probably are mostly sitting ducks against any modern adversary. They could barely take on Yemen.

      If your adversary has satellites that can tell them where you are and a sufficient amount of missiles / torpedoes, there’s only so much you can do.

      • AmidFuror
        link
        fedilink
        53 months ago

        This is absolutely true. Carriers are very vulnerable to advanced anti-ship missiles. But people with staunch political views have alternative truths they prefer to see propagated, so you’ve been punished.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53 months ago

      against hypersonic missile (speed mach 5 to mach 25), good luck to spot it and try to destroy it before it reaches you

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Most claimed “hypersonic” missiles can’t actually manoeuvre at those speeds so you can spot them at distance and work out where you need to send an interceptor missile. We saw this with Patriot batteries vs Kinzhal in Ukraine.

      • DerGottesknecht
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 months ago

        Should be pretty easy to spot, those nose cones will be glowing in the atmosphere like rudolfs nose

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      113 months ago

      During some war games a few years ago, the Dutch Navy managed to score a hit against a US Navy carrier using a diesel sub.

      Like someone else said here, carriers are big, slow targets, it’s not impossible for something to sneak past and sink them.

      • socsa
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 months ago

        Carriers are actually some of the fastest ships out there because of nuclear propulsion.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 months ago

        Not in anyway an expert on matters naval, but diesel subs are pretty quiet running on electric motors. Nuclear reactors make more noise.

        Feel free to correct me.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 months ago

          Point is, they’re big, impossible to hide from anyone that has satellites, and you just need to get a lucky hit with a relatively cheap missile/torpedo to give the other side a multi-billion dollar loss in one go.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        43 months ago

        Diesel subs are also different kinds of beasts. They’re terrible for international conflict, but for short range operations, they’re silent. You can turn off a diesel engine, but not a nuclear reactor.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 months ago

          Has anyone tried making a reactor that can be turned off? Seems like an easy upgrade to make them silent in the short term.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 months ago

            I’d imagine it’s not doable because of how quickly they’d develop insane amounts of heat.

      • Buelldozer
        link
        fedilink
        English
        73 months ago

        It was impressive but it happened in 1999. The Dutch Captain said that he doubted he could do it again and indeed a different Dutch Submarine failed at it the next year.

        Carriers are considerable faster (30 Knots) than Diesel Subs (20 Knots) too, something the Dutch Captain touches on in that article.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 months ago

          Well in my mind few years ago was 1999…

          Seriously though I thought this only happened within the last 10 years, TIL.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    63 months ago

    I just imagine that almost all large military vehicles are sitting ducks to drones and such. Just look at Ukraine vs. Russia’s navy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      43 months ago

      Not a great comparison when you consider Russia’s navy hasn’t improved much from the Cold War days. Their tech is old.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      43 months ago

      The problem with USVs is they’re relatively slow, if a ship is aware of their presence and is in a fighting state - it can get rid of a bunch of them. And it seems that navy helicopters are a decent counter, but overall it’s too early to tell if USVs are that good or was it the element of surprise.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I think the correct question here is:

    “Why? They couldn’t before you were in charge.”

  • Optional
    link
    fedilink
    English
    33 months ago

    To be fair, he was completely hammered when he said that and doesn’t remember it at all.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    123 months ago

    China can kill us. We need more money for war. (Has the biggest and most expensive military in the world) SMH