cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/28249577

Top Trump official Stephen Miller’s recent declaration that anyone who “preaches hate for America” will face deportation has ignited alarm online, with critics warning the statement disregards First Amendment protections.

Social media users and legal analysts raised immediate concerns, pointing out that expressing dissent or criticism of the government is protected under the First Amendment. Some worried the administration was veering into authoritarian territory.

The backlash has reignited broader debates over the limits of free speech, especially as civil liberties fall under scrutiny. While immigration enforcement remains a core theme of President Donald Trump’s platform, critics are increasingly questioning whether rhetoric like Miller’s is a precursor to more aggressive suppression of dissent.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    483 months ago

    I love America. I swore to defend it against all enemies. I do not love what it is doing or who the government defines as enemies.

    • flandish
      link
      fedilink
      183 months ago

      When will you recognize that the government is behaving as if citizens are the enemy and itself is actually doing the same things enemies do…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      103 months ago

      I love who the government defines as enemies. I don’t love that the government defines them as enemies.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    124
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    That goes against the first amendment, which I think makes it anti-american. Can Stephen Miller start by deporting himself?

    • thedruid
      link
      fedilink
      53 months ago

      He will be jailed with the rest when the time comes

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 months ago

        They always hated what the Constitution actually has in it, like no endorsement of their god, for instance.

        • dandelion (she/her)
          link
          fedilink
          23 months ago

          of course, but that might be part of the reason they shouted their loyalty to it all the louder

      • flandish
        link
        fedilink
        243 months ago

        They never were. Unless they added things that helped them or a cohort at a given time. cf: prohibition, its repeal, etc.

        • dandelion (she/her)
          link
          fedilink
          23 months ago

          I don’t think they care about their hypocrisy, tbh - I think they view themselves as more American while dismantling America. This is just how reactionary coups work, they appeal to nationalism, but insist on reverting to an older status quo as a more authentic version of that nationalism. (It’s a re-invisioning of America in a sense.)

            • dandelion (she/her)
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              yes, and in some sense it doesn’t really matter if even the founding of America conflicts with their America - they believe their America is more American. This is the reactionary mindset, that the past is best while not even having the education to know what the past was. Instead the ideals are set as an agenda by whatever the reactionary institutions say the past is, and in political movements those ideals and details often change as needed for political gains. Unfortunately this is not just exclusive to reactionaries (the Russian revolution brought about Stalin after all and the French revolution led to Napoleon), but I do tend to think reactionary minds are more quick to accept reality based on authority rather than reason or evidence, and that makes them more politically convenient as followers.

              All the more reason to view the reactionaries as not really invested in any particular past or tradition, but instead as being influenced by certain groups and people - those most visible and influential often being more like grifters than theologians or stewards of tradition.

  • barnaclebutt
    link
    fedilink
    8
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I’m pretty sure Stephen Miller is just undead Goebbels resurrected in a skin suit. Not as smart, but the instincts are intact.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    73 months ago

    This is the same bogus and weaponizable logic that legitimate criticism of Israel’s genocide = ‘antisemitism’ is. If you want to call legitimate criticism of the illegal and unethical actions of this POTUS administration ‘hate for America’, the notion that deportations (of US-born people) are going to ramp up shortly just became very real for me

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    9
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Here it is, the mask comes off and they tell us to comply or die. We are officially in a fascist dictatorship.

    This is where we use our community organizations to alert when and where ICE will be showing up, and making sure armed support shows up to make sure ICE steps down or dies whenever they slink out of the shadows.

    If they come for you to deport you to El Salvador you need to kill as many as possible or try to escape to Mexico/Canada, because going to El Salvador is a death sentence anyway.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    123 months ago

    Fuck Steven Millier the majority of Americans hate the POS fucktard! The majority of Americans hate the way the moronic fat orange slob trump has changed democracy in America and find him repulsive, disgusting and a complete fucking idiot along with his cabal of asshat republicans who can fucking shove christianity, their Bible and their ideology up their privileged white asses! Nothing but POS cowards, white trash who hide behind their walls and use the moron low IQ ICE Agents who probably average an IQ of 2! Can’t wait to see America fight back…in time those agents will regret their I’ll will!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    They are going to milk the extrajudicial rendition until there is an actual outbreak of violence to try and stop it.

    Then Trump will send those people involved into a gulag, too.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      93 months ago

      Agreed the purpose is to cause people to act and then move in to crush them. All the while playing the victim. Of course that play doesn’t always work.

  • Phoenixz
    link
    fedilink
    133 months ago

    Disagreeing with the dear leader will also be the same as preaching hate for America

    Not clapping enthusiastic enough will also be the same as preaching hate for America