Our anti-de Sitter club is small at the moment, but I’ve started corresponding with the conformal field theory people.
There really is an xkcd for everything.
I love reading about physics things that I just can’t conceptualize. Spaces with more or fewer than 360 degrees of rotation? Cool, I absolutely can’t imagine it
Try drawing a triangle on a globe and measure the angles, it will be more than 180 degrees. That’s probably the simplest visualisation possible.
Look at you, making it all easy to understand
Spheres are examples of surfaces with positive curvature. Negative curvature (where the angles of a triangle add up to less than 180 degrees) is represented by this saddle shape:
If you draw a triangle on different parts of a toroid, would you get different angles?
Same is true for a sphere. For example, if you draw a triangle with 1 vertex at the north pole and the other two on the equator, all the angles are 90 degrees. But if you move, say, the north pole vertex to be closer to the two in the equator, then you’d get a smaller sum.
Hmm… that’s a good point. Basically anything other than a flat surface will have these bizarre properties.
Yup! That saddle is a shape of constant negative curvature. On a toroid, the inside of the hole would have negative curvature and the outside would have positive curvature.
Wow. That would be truly bizarre kind of space to live in.
You made an enemy out of a sitter today. You’ve turned Willem de Sitter into Willem Dafoe.
deleted by creator
