- cross-posted to:
- firefox@fedia.io
- firefox@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- firefox@fedia.io
- firefox@lemmy.world
You must log in or register to comment.
Hey Mozilla, here’s a hint: nobody likes AI.
Hey Mozilla, if we wanted ai, we would use chrome
I have no issue with AI
Just stop with the useless integrations. I don’t need AI on every single thing. I would much rather have something lighter weight.
Firefox translations are cool but that’s about it from a usefulness perspective
hey @ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org, here’s a hint: you don’t have to use it ;)
It’s true. But what’s also true is that Mozilla is squandering development resources on this AI slop instead of making the browser better.
Then again, developing stuff nobody wants has been a hallmark of Mozilla for decades. So nothing new there…
Recently, they made a blog post triumphantly proclaiming creating two divisions for AI. To me, that sounds like two divisions that are about to get laid off.
To be successful, Firefox should not only try to keep up with the competition, but also offer some unique features that would attract new users.
I agree that LLMs are overhyped, but in my opinion they are quite good at summarising text. We all hate clickbait titles, and this feature has the potential to actually combat them. And what’s unique about Firefox’s approach is that it’s truly private. No other browser offers this.
There are tons and tons of extensions that would work for summaries and generic AI tasks. It would have been perfect for Mozilla to make this an extension and recommend it.
This all adds more surface area for attack and vulnerabilities.
To activate a Link Preview, hover over a link and press Shift (⇧) plus Alt (Option ⌥ on macOS),
Thanks god it’s not default.
Arc has a similar feature, but last I checked it used ChatGPT. Firefox runs a local model, so it avoids the privacy issue.
I have no problem with this in principle. The question is, does it suck? Document summary is a use case LLMs are well suited for, but it’s still highly application-specific. I’ve seen great summarizers and I’ve seen garbage summarizers. Hopefully Mozilla’s implementation is not as lazy as most others.
We heard you like AI
…did you? Did you really?
That’s not the actual title of the article…
“We heard investors like AI”
deleted by creator
The feature looks like absolute shit. Their supposed use-case is “you opened a bunch of tabs and none of them have what you need” and yet they expect you instead to sit there with your mouse hovering over a link, while holding a shortcut on the keyboard, waiting for the AI summary to finish loading? That would slow you down about 10x versus just opening all the links and looking at the page?
If they wanted link previews, why didn’t they just prefetch the page and render it normally in a preview thumbnail like the ones that you now get when hovering over an open tab?
Mindless shoe-horning of AI into the product to check some kind of box for the overpaid C-suite. For shame.
By all accounts, this sucks.
I tried the link preview feature on a link to the English Wikipedia article about Touhou Project, and the LLM’s key points are just hilariously bad. For some reason it’s focusing too much on the PS4 and Nintendo Switch (which the LLM “thinks” were both released on August 15, 1997). I have a screenshot 6 days ago when it wasn’t a Firefox Labs feature yet in my Misskey:
https://makai.chaotic.ninja/notes/a6d86p8n26
Tried it today in an updated Nightly and the key points are still the same lol.
Horray I guess
Please no… I hope it can be disabled.
In my humble but correct opinion, Mozilla should be doing two things and two things only:
- Building THE reference implementation web browser, and
- Being a jugular-snapping attack dog on standards committees.
- There is no 3.
I actually don’t think the idea is terrible, but judging from other local AI Firefox stuff (translation for example) it’s probably pretty bad.
Mozilla leadership sure has gone down the drain.
Kinda shit that happens when a non profit is concerned with offering a competitive salary to CEOs with MBAs
.
🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
Yes!! AI. AI.
Nobody really likes AI other than it being a gimmick that you cant really trust in the first place since it might halucinate. So since youbhave to check everything it says in the first place youbcould just do whatever it does in the first place without wasting resources for calculation
you would be surprised how many believe most things an AI says. I would think its rougly the same userbase that can’t tell the differences between firefox and chrome even in generalities, other than its looks. “the consumerbase”
Fair, but if you are this, pardon, stupid, then you would be unable to handle proper information anyways.
lots of people already fail to verify what they read online. that’s modern society I’m afraid. but I guess it’s not something new, probably you have also heard of the misconception “they said it on TV so it must be true!”
this comment might come off as me thinking they are stupid, but I think for the most part they are just endlessly ignorant
Total mozilla death NOW!
You might want to avoid “total anything death” phrases
Oh ok
