“This is really going to impact institutions that we take for granted,” Internet Archive director of archiving and data services Jefferson Bailey told the Standard, “like our museums, our historical societies, our public libraries, our academic libraries — just a lot of people that keep information free and accessible and online.”

  • SerotoninSwells
    link
    fedilink
    1152 months ago

    “Those who control the present, control the past and those who control the past control the future.”

    George Orwell, 1984

    • @prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I think people are going to find that, with the existence of the internet, it’s a lot more difficult to completely remove things from the collective memory. Won’t stop them from trying though.

      Unless they pull some “Great Firewall” shit. And even then… That said, it does seem like they only need ~30% of the population to believe it, and they have that shit locked down.

  • @Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    582 months ago

    I am not now, nor have I ever been a Christian, but shit like this makes me go Jesus Fucking Christ.

    Archive.org is a critical repository of knowledge and archiving the internet. Elon has cut nothing, but damaged a ton. It is kinda incredible how many damage he has done.

  • @PunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    622 months ago

    They are scared because the people don’t want things to go back to the way they were.

    The people want them gone.

    And it’s 100% justified.

    They know they deserve to be handed over to the mob.

  • finder
    link
    fedilink
    282 months ago

    Who else is waiting to see “DOGE Cuts Funding for Wikipedia”?

  • @courageousstep@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    432 months ago

    I just want to shake conservatives and ask “Why doesn’t your government want you to know things??”

    • @prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It won’t do shit. These are the same people that wouldn’t shut the fuck up about “FEMA death camps” when Obama was in office.

      This is advanced brain rot.

    • @ours@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      182 months ago

      Recent inconvinient history. They love to dig up ancient “glory days” (e.g., Ancient Rome, Teutonic knights…) and attach them to their image.

      • @pipes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        222 months ago

        They’re not meticulous historians though. LGBTQ people were more accepted in the Roman Republic (and in ancient Greek) than today.

        “Caius Julius Caesar: husband to all the wives, wife to all the husbands.” was a saying that my Latin professor taught us in school.

        • @ours@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          They don’t care. Just like with religious texts, they’ll shop around for the things they like and ignore those they don’t.

        • Yigru Zeltil
          link
          fedilink
          English
          92 months ago

          They’re not meticulous historians though. LGBTQ people were more accepted in the Roman Republic (and in ancient Greek) than today.

          “Caius Julius Caesar: husband to all the wives, wife to all the husbands.” was a saying that my Latin professor taught us in school.

          Being AMAB and bottom was stigmatized to the point their swearing system revolved around emasculation threats, so that’s different from what the queer movement of today aims for…

          • @pipes@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            32 months ago

            I agree that it should not be the goal for any modern civilization to copy Rome. They were not a just society, they had slavery for starters, but Roman citizens enjoyed a lot of personal liberty. If you were dirt poor you would not even have the time for a “nonproductive” relationship, if you’ll excuse my expression. Kids were a resource more than a cost.

            I’m not an expert but I think “stigmatized” is too strong a word in this context, I’m sure they did joke around if a rumour or a hunch was spread about a person’s romantic affairs by the people who hated them for their success or by their enemies, I’m not sure they really cared that much otherwise. Of course before the christian emperors came along.

          • AbsentBird
            link
            fedilink
            English
            8
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Our swearing system in modern English revolves around sex, violence and infidelity, but our society is also kinda into those things. Societies are complicated.

            Edit: also sometimes people still say shit about bottoms when they curse.

          • @andros_rex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            22 months ago

            Being bottom was really only stigmatized if you were bottoming for a social inferior.

            Giving a woman head was more “gay”/stigmatized than taking it up the bum, unless maybe it was a slave penetrating you.

            There’s no room or recognition for lesbians really. Trans issues are a tangled web, as they always are.

      • baltakatei
        link
        fedilink
        102 months ago

        I doubt the Library of Alexandria had permission from all rights holders to hold copies of many books. /s

  • scops
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2082 months ago

    Elon Musk will go to any length to scrub this image from the Internet: