• Chozo
    link
    fedilink
    1613 days ago

    On one hand, this is a huge grey zone in terms of privacy. But on the other hand, it’s also a huge win for anybody who has had to endure unsolicited dick pics. I used to work with a woman who had a stalker that would send her “tribute” photos from spoofed numbers to appear as people in her contact list; this feature wouldn’t have completely blocked the messages, but would have at least mitigated some of the trauma she went through.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1013 days ago

      Then it should be at the phone level. Setting of: blur photos from unknown contacts.

      All this google function has done is get parents in trouble with the law and closed google accounts when telehealth doctors have asked for pictures of their kids rashes for diagnosis

      • Chozo
        link
        fedilink
        313 days ago

        I know the story you’re referring to, that’s something different. That was a cloud-based storage scanning, this appears to be running entirely locally on the user’s device.

        Imo, it’s a better solution, but still not perfect, and not immune to abuse.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          413 days ago

          Yeah facebooks WhatsApp was doing local phone scanning of content and then reporting back to the mothership. Its under the guise of protecting kids from abuse, but it can also be nefarious if Facebook is pressured by the government to also include a scan of anti administration talk, or a person search. Just too Orwellian in my opinion

    • sunzu2
      link
      fedilink
      313 days ago

      Clearly this is why Google is adding this feature

  • MudMan
    link
    fedilink
    3213 days ago

    Google has been scanning your photos for a long time, both in the Gallery and the Photos app. Yes, with AI.

  • sunzu2
    link
    fedilink
    2213 days ago

    Unhinged behaviour that we just supposed to accept becuase a mega corpo is doing it?

  • CherryLips
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1113 days ago

    I have started to leave google. Can I ask them to remove any scanned data?

  • Harold
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1013 days ago

    George Orwell was off by a few decades, it seems.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      312 days ago

      While I understand your point, the biggest misconception about the 1984 book is that it’s mainly about surveillance — it’s about manipulation of words, e.g. Ministry of “Peace”.

      • Harold
        link
        fedilink
        English
        212 days ago

        While I understand your point, it was never implied in my comment that 1984 is mainly about surveillance — in fact, it implicitly drew a parallel to the fictional setting of 1984, e.g. “the dystopian future wherein total surveillance to control the narrative” appearing to have become reality.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    5113 days ago

    At the time, Google assured me that SafetyCore was an enabling framework and would not actually start scanning photos or other content.

    I audibly snorted at this.

    Well that time has now come and it starts with Google Messages. As reported by 9to5Google, “Google Messages is rolling out Sensitive Content Warnings that blur nude images on Android.”

    I know whenever my phone announces of its own accord that it’s figured out that an image on my phone is a nude, the first word that comes to mind is “safe.”