Automakers and tech developers testing and deploying self-driving and advanced driver assistance features will no longer have to report as much detailed, public crash information to the federal government, according to a new framework released today by the US Department of Transportation.

https://archive.ph/wWwjG

  • ✺roguetrick✺
    link
    fedilink
    English
    107 days ago

    The boon here isn’t that it’ll allow them to bring a shoddy product to market. The boon is they’ll be able to continue milking investors by hiding the fact that they have no marketable product in this space while they keep selling off their stock.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    287 days ago

    Serious question: If I get hit by one of these death machines, who can I (or my next-of-kin) sue? Has that been established in court?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      347 days ago

      In a Musk-approved world:

      • You’re hit by a Tesla in FSD mode, the driver gets sued for not driving.
      • You’re hit by a fully autonomous Tesla taxi, you get sued for vandalism.
      • You’re the driver and FSD hit someone, you get sued.
      • You’re the owner and the car hits someone while you’re not in it, you get sued for owning it.
      • You’re the owner and it catches fire with you inside, you(r estate) gets sued for “not maintaining it”.
      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        In all cases, the warranty on the Tesla in question is immediately voided. And the odometer starts running 15% faster with every major incident.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      57 days ago

      Serious answer: the owner of the vehicle is responsible for it. You sue the owner, their insurance, possibly your insurance, possibly tesla, possibly nobody. The best result is to walk away avoiding court with more money.

    • teft
      link
      fedilink
      English
      807 days ago

      Yes, but you’ll be on the roads with them.

    • L3sM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      157 days ago

      will no longer have to report as much detailed, public crash information to the federal government

      I feel like this is more incentive not to purchase one, than to purchase one

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1057 days ago

    This would be REALLY Corrupt if Elon Musk had donated a QUARTER BILLION DOLLARS TO TRUMP and then was Given a Government Oversight Position! FORTUNATELY Fox News told me that DIDNT happen!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    217 days ago

    Well that’s convenient for the author maker / oligarch / unelected government squatter running the country. I guess every once in awhile things just turn up his way.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    357 days ago

    All I can say is invest in 4k vehicle cameras. Get one facing one and one facing the rear. CYA for when these self-driving Teslas start crashing into everything.

  • Let's Go 2 the Mall!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    16 days ago

    Owning a tesler is embarrassing. Even in my deep red trump loving state, most people would never buy one.

  • Ulrich
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I wonder if the author realizes there are other companies making “self-driving” vehicles.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I’m sure that they’re just as shitty and more concerned with profits than safety, just like Tesla. When you don’t punish companies and ceo’s like you would a homeless person, or teacher, or doctor, or police officer, or fireman, then they have no incentive to do anything other than profit at the expense of society.