For me: Cancelling paid subscriptions should be as easy as subscribing. I hate the fact that they actively hide the unsubscribe option or that you sometimes should have to write an e-mail if you want to unsubscribe.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    12 months ago

    This isn’t an illegal thing but more of a tip for the thing you hate. Most credit card companies will let you open and close virtual credit cards tied to your main account, but with a new card number etc. I make a new virtual card for every subscription I have. If I want to cancel the service and it takes more than 5m to do so through the company that provides that service, I just turn off the virtual credit card they will try and fail to charge for the next payment.

  • Hossenfeffer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    282 months ago

    A free trial automatically rolling into a paid subscription.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    172 months ago

    For subscriptions, I highly recommend using disposable cards like Privacy.com (no affiliation, just a customer). If I want to try out Prime, or Starz, or a “free until…” promotional offer, I just spin up a card. It’s connected to my bank account, locked to that single merchant, and they can’t charge more than whatever spending limit I put on that card. Honestly, I don’t always even sign in to a service to cancel, it’s much easier to just pause or delete a card, and then they can’t charge you anymore. It’s free for us because they collect a small portion of the transaction amount (like Visa, PayPal, etc)…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 months ago

      I used them for a couple of years. But I kept finding that when I went to re-sign up for new vendors they wouldn’t support the cards for some reason. Has this gotten better?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 months ago

      Damn, where you live at where this is legal because shit is about to get ROUGH where I’m at and I’m trying to get free groceries.

      • palordrolap
        link
        fedilink
        32 months ago

        They write in Finnish in other comments, but I don’t seem to be able to confirm or deny the law there, at least not with a quick search.

        I did find an article that suggested that it’s been ruled legal in Italy, but only if you’re homeless and hungry. I can imagine that if you tried it and had any assets whatsoever, they’d find a way to put a lien on those assets rather than let you get away with it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 months ago

      depends, many placed closed down as of recently due to the massive lifting problem. this is less of a problem in wealthier areas.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    302 months ago

    My car insurance goes up as my car loses value. Years ago you could choose to only insure it up to a certain amount. My kids drove an older car and i designated $10k in insurance for it. That cut the insurance price to about 60%. Texas no longer allows that.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      182 months ago

      Isn’t most of the insurance for liability? I can see a logic where older cars are less safe, and thus accidents are more likely and would cost more, hence the higher costs. But I’m just guessing.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        32 months ago

        Collision insurance, the kind that pays for damage to the policy holder’s car in the event of a crash caused by the policy holder or an authorized driver of their car often more than doubles the overall cost of insurance. Collision insurance is usually optional when there’s not a loan.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 months ago

      Your car may lose value, but the cost to repair goes up. Hence the insurance increases. Also the likelihood of a total loss goes up as well.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        The insurance will never pay more than the value of the car, so if the repair cost goes too high they’ll just declare it a total loss and pay the “fair market value” of the car. And yes, a total loss is more likely, but that doesn’t mean the insurance pays more, on the contrary, they use that to pay less.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      22 months ago

      Sometimes I get so pissed they don’t have the main item I came for, that I go put everything back on the shelves, exactly where they came from.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1242 months ago

    Corporations that don’t pay taxes being allowed to make millions in profit while their employees qualify for welfare because they pay them so little.

    • slazer2au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      292 months ago

      What’s worse is those same organisations get corporate welfare (tax breaks) but fight tooth and nail to prevent their workers from getting it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      252 months ago

      They should just make it so that whatever they announce as their “earnings” to their stockholders should also be the amount that they are taxed for.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    32 months ago

    I think in the eu we have some legislation about it. I have the feeling of reading about a law like that before. Subscription buttons needing to be as clear as unsubscribe.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    572 months ago

    Biden administration was working on making that unsubscribe bullshit illegal last year. But then Trump so those tactics will probably be mandatory pretty soon…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        62 months ago

        I think email unsubscribe was an existing requirement from a few years ago. Biden’s thing was about unsubscribing from paid services, like Netflix.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        52 months ago

        Click to Cancel was put in as a rule, but it requires active enforcement. It also had a 180 day grace period from last October, so it hasn’t even gone into effect yet.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    242 months ago

    Shooting plainclothes cops that execute a no-knock warrant on your home.

    Seriously.

    All states–ALL states–have a castle doctrine that allows you to use lethal defense to protect yourself inside your home. A no-knock warrant being executed by cops out of uniform means that you have a reasonable belief that your home is being invaded, and that your life is at immediate risk. Now, admittedly, you probably aren’t going to survive that exchange of gunfire. But the state is going to have a really hard time charging you with shooting at/killing a cop if you do.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 months ago

        Even better: you have a specific legal right to resist police attempting to illegally enter your home. :D IIRC, the law was passed after the Indiana Supreme Court ruled that under then state law you had no right to resist even blatantly illegal actions by police.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        32 months ago

        I believe that most other countries call them provinces rather than states. But yes, if you live in a country that has a normal police force, and you don’t have to worry about out-of-uniform cops using no-knock warrants to kick your front door in, then this is definitely not going to apply to you.

    • BeardedBlaze
      link
      fedilink
      92 months ago

      About dozen States do NOT have a castle doctrine, and have duty to retreat laws instead.

        • y0kai
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          In some parts of the US (at least, maybe nationally) the castle doctrine even extends to your car. It is thought of as an “extension” of your home/castle.

          Edit: spelling