• Fuckass [none/use name]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    24
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I like how 90% of “BlackPeopleTwitter” is just jokes and memes or references and discussions to black culture, and 90% of “WhitePeopleTwitter” is just complaining about Trump and being easily impressed by other old, powerful white people (aka white American culture)

  • Sickos [they/them, it/its]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    412 years ago

    Wait, there’s a debate already? No this is too soon. This is like Christmas shit showing up in a store in september

    • Adkml [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      462 years ago

      There’s a “debate” between 8 people who are polling at 15% combined.

      It’s as relevant as if you asked the dining room of a random restaurant what they would do if they were president.

      There might be some entertainment in watching people refuse to criticize the person they’re campaigning against but I’m not wasting hours of my life to watch republicans be hypocrites.

  • duderium [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    232 years ago

    Undermining Fox News by paying them shitloads of money to display ads that will win them exactly 0 votes. Bidenomics, baby.

  • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    212 years ago

    So, the plan is to hand FOX News a bunch of Democrat donor dollars in order to stir up anti-abortion sentiment among the Republican base, because… ???

    • Fuckass [none/use name]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      192 years ago

      This isn’t the first time they’ve done this. Last time they gave a bunch of money to QAnon political candidates over their own party candidates, and some of them won.

      • Adkml [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        112 years ago

        Don’t forget giving money to the Lincoln project that literally used the money to fund political ads against their darling liberal candidates.

  • Infamousblt [any]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    862 years ago

    You’re bringing Roe back next term, Joe?

    Why not do it this term? Why are you holding women’s bodies hostage for your election?

    • duderium [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      54
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Because the president can’t actually do anything sweatie, why don’t you retake civics 101? Don’t you remember Biden’s famous 2020 campaign slogan: “I can’t do anything [except arm Ukrainian Nazis, attempt to start WW3 with Russia and China, sign oil drilling permits during climate apocalypse, undo all covid protections (except for the ones which protect me), and shrug as the right undoes Roe and Affirmative Action and god knows what else].”

    • Fuckass [none/use name]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      172 years ago

      Abortion is basically the democrats’ equivalent of anti gun control. Just keep dragging your base along to make them think you’re doing something, and maybe you’ll achieve something along the the way. The difference is that guns will never be banned in meaningful ways, while abortion can get you watched by the Texan Gestapo

  • GottiGoFast [none/use name]OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    502 years ago

    vote Vote you useless pieces of shit. Vote hard. Vote harder than you ever did in your entire life. Vote like how edgers cum.

    • Adkml [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      132 years ago

      No for real this time you gotta vote for em bro, seriously I know they’ve said this for every electiin for 2 decades and they didn’t do anything multiple times when they had the opportunity and then it got repealed on their watch after they said you have to vote for them so it won’t go away but I swear to God bro for real this time bro just vote for them one more time for sure.

  • PolPotPie [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    352 years ago

    joe means it. unfortunately, he misspoke. what joe means is he’s bringing “sears roebuck”

  • NewLeaf [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    In their wildest fantasies, they are bringing back a 50 year old ruling that isn’t even solid law, that could use all kinds of updates and clarification?

    I dont believe anyone would be able to pull it off, but I always considered this to be an opportunity to make it a real law that is a lot stronger, and more modern.

    Then I think about the fact that if libraries didn’t exist, it would be an insurmountable task to get the government to go for the idea of them now.

  • Magician [he/him, they/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    882 years ago

    He was literally the one in power when Roe was overturned. It’s like the US gives you two fantasy lands to live in and you’re treated like the problem when you point out reality.

    • NewLeaf [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      Maybe they think “trolling” means implementing such harsh austerity, that we will all be evicted and forced to live under bridges?