• @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        I understand the sentiment, but depending on what you consider “rich” that, IMO, is very, very wrong.

        • Franzia
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          You’re moving the goalpost.

          I just see two classes. The working class and the owner class. People who own entire large businesses without having to work at them or manage them? That’s rich. The owners.
          Anybody who has to work to live is by definition working class, though some working class people get paid very well and can lead decadent lives. I might be caught saying they are well-off, doing well, are rewarded generously for their work, can afford more freedoms than most. They aren’t rich though. Their continued labor makes their life possible.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      142 years ago

      They’re not the people the post is talking about. It’s the trust fund babies who just get everything for free, are given super well paying jobs because of their parents, and just never have to struggle.

      Not their fault, just sucks to be on the other end of it

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    32 years ago

    I don’t have to work 40h a week to get by…

    I work a lot more, but for my own leisure…

    I live in France.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    222 years ago

    I’m not jealous of anyone, good on you. What I do have a problem with is when the rich refuse to pay their fair share of taxes. Not only do they don’t want to pay a fair share, while using our society, they use that money they saved cheesing the system to subvert politicans and our system to pay even less and squeeze people even more.

    All that said I also think billionaires shouldn’t be a a thing. Past 1000 million dollars you should be taxed at 99%.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      What does that fix though? Government is a little more funded, so what? If thieves were rampant, the solution isn’t taxing the thieves.

      Billionaires leech off of the working class and we should just tax them? No, we need to address the underlying mechanisms that allow them to do that. If someone actually did $1 billion worth of labor, they deserve the billion, and probably a prize for being the first

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      62 years ago

      While I agree with your message on taxation, I don’t think any billionaires actually earn a billion dollars that could be taxed like that.

      Our media fawns over their wealth which is assets, their business value and the like, not actual income that could be taxed. I definitely agree with a wealth tax though, but I don’t know if that operates in the same way as a progressive income tax works, as in “after x amount you owe y% and then z% after another total dollar amount.”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Wealth tax. No one needs more money. You’ve won capitalism. Now you can compete in a high score of who gives back most to society, and pretend it’s actually you that is doing the good deed.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          I kinda like the general idea, but I think you’d just end up with corporate fat-cats that personally hold close the limit, and then have a couple of hundred ‘friends’ who hold the rest and live in fear of themselves and their families getting disappeared if they touch the wealth without directions from said fat-cats.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      62 years ago

      Not just that but I don’t think massive amounts of wealth concentrated into a small number of hands is good for a democracy.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    412 years ago

    I’m envious of the rich because they’ll never know the struggle of having to choose between gas in the car to get to work, or paying your bills so the heat stays on.

    It’s the security that I want. If I could quit my job tomorrow and all my bills would be convered and all my debts (and their related payments) suspended, and I was given enough to put food on the table… Then I’d be a lot happier. I’d know that I’ll never have to submit to some dickhead boss trying to push me around so I can be underpaid and go home late to my cold house because I don’t make enough to keep it warm.

    The future is stupid.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      I went from homeless to 6 figures and security is exactly what drove me so hard. It’s such a relief to just keep my bills and mortgage on autopay and never even think about it. I still feel like an imposter when I go to the grocery store and don’t have to keep track of how much every item costs to ensure I have enough to cover it.

      I’m not rich by most definitions but getting to a point of real stability makes life so much easier. Granted I still worry all the time that I’ll be fired and I have backup plans upon backup plans in case shit hits the fan.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      9
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      That was most of the past, too

      It was really only like 30-40 years when things were good economically for the average person. Every couple hundred years we get little blips like that for certain geographic areas.

  • OBG
    link
    fedilink
    672 years ago

    The closer I get to my retirement the more I realize how much of my life has been wasted at my job. It’s sad really.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    42 years ago

    It seems so easy for them, if you ignore all the work it took for them to get rich in the first place.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1122 years ago

    I’m not jealous of rich people’s possessions or lifestyle. I’m worried about the power they wield over other people’s lives. Their power to affect the laws that get passed, their power to close down stores and factories and lay off all the workers, their power to kick people out of their homes.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1392 years ago

    This is how I feel reading Oppenheimer’s biography. He came from an affluent family and apparently never had to worry about paying the bills, being free to fully dedicate himself to the things that interested him. The guy was a genius, no doubt about that… I just feel that we would have a lot more geniuses out there if we didn’t have to work so much in order to enjoy so little.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      262 years ago

      “I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops.”

      • Stephen Jay Gould
    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      672 years ago

      There are definitely people out there capable of major contributions to human culture and knowledge toiling in a sweat shop or picking fruit.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    162 years ago

    Image Transcription:

    X/Twitter post by user lauren🌙 @lanaskittens reading: I’m not jealous of rich people bc of the things they have, I’m jealous of rich people because they get to pursue their passions in life without having to work a gruelling 40+ hours a week job literally just to get by

    [I am a human, if I’ve made a mistake please let me know. Please consider providing alt-text for ease of use. Thank you. 💜]

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    272 years ago

    Some well off people work way more than 40 hours per week to be wealthy. Not all of them are living the dream (so to speak) - they also can be stuck.

    What the super rich people get is time. They have people to take care of all the crap the rest of us deal with - shopping, fixing the car, booking holidays, cooking, cleaning…

    Yeah… I’d rather be wealthy than not.