Pricefield | Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 month ago

Row major huh

sub.wetshaving.social

message-square
14
fedilink
271

Row major huh

sub.wetshaving.social

@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 month ago
message-square
14
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • 6️⃣9️⃣4️⃣2️⃣0️⃣
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11•1 month ago

    My matrices wear Hilbert Pants

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      2•
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      An ai generated 3x3 matrix "wearing" a single pant leg that follows a partial Hilbert curve. The Hilbert's curve is not totally accurate.

  • Lucien [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    11•1 month ago

    C vs Fortran

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    6•1 month ago

    If either, a symmetric matrix would stop being symmetric and would hence not be able to wear pants. With this conclusion in mind I propose that symmetric matrices are from now on called naked matrices instead.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    23•1 month ago

    A matrix is already wearing chaps and needs no additional leg wear.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    17•1 month ago

    Wearable for infinite matrices

  • luluu
    link
    fedilink
    8•1 month ago

    That is a pant, not pants

  • OpenStars
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8•1 month ago

    Both - one leg each way.

  • Omega
    link
    fedilink
    4•1 month ago

    Why are we not considering the matrix as a whole, but as a fucking snake or something?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    12•1 month ago

    Clearly would have one leg per column - joint at the top row

  • @[email protected]
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    4•1 month ago

    It would wear it in the direction of the matrix determinant calculation, the right leg on the positive direction and the left leg on the negative

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1•1 month ago

      How would that work? Determinants are calculated recursively

      • @[email protected]
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        2•1 month ago

        It’s have pants recursively too.

    • Match!!
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5•1 month ago

      eigenpants

[email protected]

[email protected]
Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Community rules

1. Be civil

No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politics

This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent reposts

Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No bots

No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads

No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

  • [email protected] : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
  • [email protected] : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
  • [email protected] : Linux themed memes
  • [email protected] : for those who love comic stories.
  • 8 users / day
  • 150 users / week
  • 3.69K users / month
  • 8.97K users / 6 months
  • 2 subscribers
  • 6.62K Posts
  • 180K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • @[email protected]
  • The Picard Maneuver
    cake
  • The Picard Maneuver
  • UI: 0.18.4
  • BE: 0.18.2
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org