How does that work? I usually take 2 to 4 hours, how are all the other men supposed to fit in, in only 6 hours?
Or is it literally sleeping? Because I’ve been to a 80.000 people festival, there have been several thousand sleeping at the same time I was sleeping, so my track record is better then hers.
Well alrighty then
Wow. I hope she recovers fully and quickly.
583 men in six hours.
That’s about 37 seconds each.
Wow
Looks more like bullshit to me.
You’re assuming one at a time.
I think that’s reasonable when when calculating an average.
It also assumes that men were the only other participants. ;)
Question is the mean jerk time assuming the dtf is presorted.
What a lucky female
“I don’t understand why people have such an issue with it. These guys are just out here living life. They’ve been given an opportunity, and they’re like, ‘F*** it. Like, let’s just do it.’ They’re just having some fun. I think the people that are hating [are] probably just jealous, and their lives are really boring …I mean, the more they hate on me, the more views I get, and the more money I make.”
“…I mean, the more they hate on me, the more views I get, and the more money I make.”
I think that pretty much sums up a big part of America’s problem right there lol
The internet hate machine is hardly an exclusively American problem.
removed by mod
I’ve never gotten up to that number in a night, but I’ve gotten up to 30 or so. Planned it out as a birthday treat for myself. Something I wanted to do, because it was fun.
Some people really do like sex.
You’re just advertising. No better than any other company lying in internet comments to get people to click. Fuck off.
No? The quickest I block a guy is when they offer me money. I don’t have an OF and don’t want one. (If I took money, I’d feel pressured into doing things that I don’t like.)
If I want clicks, it’s for my own… interests.
threatening unwanted physical harm against friends/acquaintences for any reason is morally bankrupt.
It is, isn’t?
Let me concern about the outcome of my actions.
Let me concern about the outcome of my actions.
Maybe you should “concern about” your ability to form coherent sentences
Is my poor domain of the english language that is most concerning to you? I’ll be losing my sleep, tonight.
No, your inability to form a coherent thought was just easy to target. What I really don’t like about you is that you apparently don’t see women as independent human beings with their own thoughts and goals.
You do you. Have a nice day.
Great, now apply that logic to other people
I am. And the very sad conclusion I’m forced to draw is that most people don’t care enough about others to prevent unnecessary and easily preventable suffering.
Like the case at hand.
The woman ended in a hospital. Maybe - just maybe! - the men participating in the stunt should had stopped for a fraction of a second to think if they were enabling and causing unnecessary suffering.
Maybe.
I might be wrong.
People are into some weird shit, some of it is dangerous and/or disgusting. They were all consenting adults and it’s wrong to use violence to coerce them into behaving in ways that are less offensive to our sensibilities.
Just because it’s legal, doesn’t make correct.
The same way, many of the dangerous and/or disgusting things some individuals are into are considered a disturb.
Following that, and remembering the spirit of my original reply, that by now has been removed, I would strongly - very strongly - disincentivize any friend or acquaintance if they told me they considered either taking part or were indifferent to the outcome of such a stunt. It would be one of those friendship ending situation.
This is a calous indiference to human suffering and an easily preventable and avoidable one. And exploitation of it. Which is extremely sad. It is a telling sign of the times we live in.
I’m not defending it on the basis of it being legal, I don’t think that’s relevant here. It’s enough that everyone involved was an adult and gave their willing consent.
People do things that cause them to suffer all the time, often in the pursuit of pleasure. We have neither the realistic means nor the moral authority to protect them from the consequences of their bad choices.
I’m not going to try and tell you that I wouldn’t judge everyone involved for choosing to live their lives this way, because I definitely would, but coercing them with violence into making different choices would likely do little to to prevent the original harm and only add more on top of it.
I love the euphemism that she “slept with” 583 guys. I mean that’s a lotta naps in 6 hours! Takes me at least 20 minutes to drift off.
deleted by creator
Honestly i’m sorry but why do it if it hurts? Is it just for fame?
She’s an OF model and this is her niche. It’s literally her job.
No its her stunt to make her job stand out and very clearly detrimental to her ability to do her job.
Either she never read the book “Snuff” or she wanted to see if it would really happen…
Some people just built different I guess
Anything to help the children of Gaza.
I can figure out what I find more gross. The man that participated in this… …or the female. Just cause you can, doesn’t mean you should. Talking about setting yourself apart. This country is nothing but spectacle.
Have you ever seen a woman who was naked in front of you willingly?
the female
Go back
the female
Lol incel alert.
🚨🚨 INCEL ALERT 🚨🚨
Ew, gross, an incel. Don’t feed it it should go away.
Does clutching pearls at other people‘s actions serve you well in life or are you just bantering here like a little Karen getting your pearls bunched up?
I can figure it out. You are more gross than either.
Someone is going to feel sore everywhere for a while
This is the third name I’ve seen with a sex with hundreds of men title in the last month or so.
In this a new trend??? In which case … I hate to be old school but wtf
It is, and there’s a handful of people trying to one-up each other.
With great financial success, I might add.
I think they might be trying for more than just one up
With great financial success, I might add.
Hopefully that hospital trip worth it.
She’s buying a house at 28, so possibly.
Besides, I’ve needed medical treatment for something that happened at work before.
I sprained my ankle playing soccer at a work-related event, I wouldn’t put it in the same ball park as bleeding genitals, though
dmgl
i assure you that group sex is not a new trend. it predates agriculture, civilization, and humanity itself.
those numbers would have been incredibly difficult to organize in the pre-internet era however.
Possible in the right park or movie theatre in the 60’s or 70’s….
The next TikTok challenge
That’s a hell of a headline
OnlyFans star Annie Knight is sharing an update amid her recent hospitalization after sleeping with 583 men in six hours.
It’s bizarre that US uses “sleeping with” to mean “had sex with”. Readers clearly understand, she uses the word “sex” in her quotes, but the magazine/site insists on using that bizarre euphemism.
I don’t think that that’s very uncommon. When one “goes to the bathroom”, it’s understood that this is a euphemism for urinating or defecating, not just hanging out there.
TIL I’ve been doing it wrong my whole life /s
I am currently using the bathroom… I mean defecating.
Agreed. It just seems like a weird editorial decision. Maybe it’s because I’m not a regular US reader, or I live in a different country, but it seems to slightly obfuscate what happened.
You’re looking way too deep into it. “Sleeping with someone” is such a common expression that nobody can possibly hope to obfuscate anything with it. Everybody knows they fucked. There will be no mistakes, no confusion. Besides, it’s not unusual for different contexts to use different phrases and expressions for the same thing. The press using a “softer” language is not a uniquely American thing by a long shot and it’s kinda weird to assume it would be.
Not an American either btw.
Jfc it’s just as bizarre as every other fucking cultures language on earth but I get it, it’s popular to shit on America while it’s fighting a civil war that was never declared. Easier than realizing this shit show is coming for you next.
I’m not talking about the US, I’m talking about US Magazine. I’ve seen other US publications use “sex” to refer to sex.
The “Us” in “Us Magazine” isn’t all caps
The great irony being that Us Magazine is a tabloid that reports almost exclusively on celebrity gossip - people who clearly aren’t “Us”
One fewer word/syllable.
I think they should pare it down further though, and just say ‘fucking’
Seconded.
You mean to tell me that when someone says that they’re taking a shit, it shouldn’t mean literally turd burgaling?
I’ve always hated the saying. Clearly you’re not sleeping if you’re boning…
The same turn of phrase exists in e.g. German.
