Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    I was trying out free github copilot to see what the buzz is all about:

    It doesn’t even know its own settings. This one little useful thing that isn’t plagiarism, providing natural language interface to its own bloody settings, it couldn’t do.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1223 days ago

    Some quality sneers in Extropic’s latest presentation about their thermodynamics hardware. My favorite part was the Founder’s mission slide “e/acc maximizes the watts per civilization while Extropic maximizes intelligence per watt”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1023 days ago

      I’m not going to watch more than a few seconds but I enjoyed how awkward Beff Jezos is coming across.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        Apparently they are going to ship their development kits sometime later this year. He still sounds confusing AF to me and my BS indicator is going off all the time. He also makes incorrect statements (around 9 minutes in) such as

        Neural nets came from energy-based models

        which makes 0 sense historically. According to Wikipedia, EBMs were first introduced in 2003.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    719 days ago

    Further evidence emerging that the effort to replace government employees with the Great Confabulatron are well at hand and the presumed first-order goal of getting a yes-man to sign off on whatever bullshit is going well.

    Now we wait for the actual policy implications and the predictable second-order effects. Which is to say dead kids.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      623 days ago

      I had so hoped that the rise of Trump (and his fall due to Biden) on the back of the more numerous and popular seeming Alt-Right had been the end of all this. Showing that NRx was a sort of weaker evolutionary dead end so to speak. But sadly no.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      823 days ago

      I didn’t know that uwu news influencer was a thing. Kind of a clash between style and topic there, but hey whatever gets the word out.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        823 days ago

        I didn’t know that uwu news influencer was a thing.

        It’s probably a thing where if you start thinking about it, it’s always been around, but we’ve just never had the right vocabulary to describe it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        721 days ago

        I didn’t know that uwu news influencer was a thing.

        Same, and also I’m still trying to process that “uwu” breached out of furry spaces and became a widely understood term. (Although I’m not entirely sure what way it took, it’s also possible that it breached out of anime-related communities. Maybe some day cyber-archeologists can figure this out.)

  • @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    620 days ago

    New artcle from Brian Merchant: An ‘always on’ OpenAI device is a massive backlash waiting to happen

    Giving my personal thoughts on the upcoming OpenAI Devicetm, I think Merchant’s correct to expect mass-scale backlash against the Devicetm and public shaming/ostracisation of anyone who decides to use it - especially considering its an explicit repeat of the widely clowned on Humane AI Pin.

    headlines of Devicetm wearers getting their asses beaten in the street to follow soon afterwards. As Brian’s noted, a lot of people would see wearing an OpenAI Devicetm as an open show of contempt for others, and between AI’s public image becoming utterly fouled by the bubble and Silicon Valley’s reputation going into the toilet, I can see someone seeing a Devicetm wearer as an opportunity to take their well-justified anger at tech corps out on someone who openly and willingly bootlicks for them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      419 days ago

      Part of me wonders if this is even supposed to be a profitable hardware product or if they’re sufficiently hard-up for training data that “put always-on microphones in as many pockets as possible” seems like a good strategy.

      It’s not, both because it’s kinda evil and because it’s definitely stupid, but I can see it being used to solve the data problem more quickly than I can see anyone think this is actually a good or useful product to create.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        18 days ago

        When I get a minute, I intend to do a back of the napkin calc to figure out how many words 100 million of these things would hear on an average day.

        100 million sounds like a target that was naively pooped out by some other requirement, like “How much training data do we need to scale to GPT-5 before the money runs out, assuming the dumbest interpolation imaginable?”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        418 days ago

        What does solving the data problem supposed to look like exactly? A somewhat higher score in their already incredibly suspect benchmarks?

        The data part of the whole hyperscaling thing seems predicated on the belief that the map will magically become the territory if only you map hard enough.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          418 days ago

          I fully agree, but as data availability is one of the primary limits that hyperscaling is running up against I can see the true believers looking for additional sources, particularly sources that aren’t available to their competitors. Getting a new device in people’s pockets with a microphone and an internet link would be one such advantage, and (assuming you believe the hyperscaling bullshit) would let OpenAI rebuild some kind of moat to keep themselves ahead of the competition.

          I don’t know, though. Especially after the failure of at least 2 extant versions of the AI companion product I just can’t imagine anyone honestly believing there’s enough of a market for this to justify even the most ludicrously optimistic estimate of the cost of bringing it to market. It’s either a data thing or a straight-up con to try and retake the front page for another few news cycles. Even the AI bros can’t be dumb enough for it to be a legit effort.

  • @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    620 days ago

    New Bluesky post from Baldur Bjarnason:

    What’s missing from the now ubiquitous “LLMs are good for code” is that code is a liability. The purpose of software is to accomplish goals with the minimal amount of code that’s realistically possible

    LLMs may be good for code, but they seem to be a genuine hazard for collaborative software dev

  • @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1421 days ago

    Veering semi-OT: the guy behind the godawful Windows 11 GUI has revealed himself:

    Looking at his Twitter profile, its clear he’s a general dumpster fire of a human being - most of his feed’s just him retweeting AI garbage or fash garbage.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        620 days ago

        “I try not to let [performance] considerations get in the way

        You could show me this without any context whatsoever and my first thought would’ve been “did a React dev say that”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1220 days ago

          It also means you can update your priors about your own biases predictive instincts being good, allowing you to be more confident in literally everything you’ve ever believed or thought about for half a second. Superpredictors unite!

    • ebu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1321 days ago

      this one is a joke, i think. he is definitely on the fashy bullshit though

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1222 days ago

      Reminds me something F.D. Signifier said on a music podcast.

      Progressives are losing the cultural war in a lot of ways, but they’ll always need us because we’re the ones pushing the boundaries on art, and it turns out, no matter how ghoulish people want to act, everyone has genuine love of fucking awesome art. The true loss condition is being captured by the tools of the master.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      Rekindled a desire to maybe try my own blog ^^.

      I think beyond “Keeping up appearances” it’s also the stereotype of fascists—and by extension LLM lovers—having trouble (or pretending to) distinguishing signifying and signified.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1623 days ago

    Im sure this is fine https://infosec.exchange/@paco/114509218709929701

    "Paco Hope #resist @[email protected]

    OMG. #Microsoft #Copilot bypasses #Sharepoint #security so you don’t have to!

    “CoPilot gets privileged access to SharePoint so it can index documents, but unlike the regular search feature, it doesn’t know about or respect any of the access controls you might have set up. You can get CoPilot to just dump out the contents of sensitive documents that it can see, with the bonus feature* that your access won’t show up in audit logs.”

    The S in CoPilot stands for Security! https://pivotnine.com/the-crux/archive/remembering-f00fs-of-old/"

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1119 days ago

    OT: Welp. Think interview went well. Just waiting for them to check references (oh god) and I should know whats what by Monday.