• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    91 month ago

    I believe in social democracy, I believe that it is the best political ideology.

    It combines a free society with a government provided safety net.

    I see communism as being too restrictive, and unregulated capitalism as being way too out of control.

    A progressive social democratic country with a strong government seems to me as combining new ideas with a stable foundation.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 month ago

        I am not well versed in the theory if economics.

        In general terms and speaking purely in an ideal world, I would expect that a regulated market economy would allow the society to exploit the free market and the greed of humans, while providing a solid foundation of government services for it’s citizens to rely on.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 month ago

    I believe it’s the duty of the strong to protect the weak.

    If you can’t protect the weak, then you’re not really strong.

  • @[email protected]
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    71 month ago

    I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve, and I believe in long, slow, deep, soft, wet kisses that last three days.

  • YappyMonotheist
    link
    fedilink
    5
    edit-2
    1 month ago
    • The universe and everything in it was made for a reason.
    • The message of Jesus, while deformed and deeply mixed with Western nonsense by Rome (polytheism, pagan rites and an immature disregard for self restraint, to name a few), will serve as a basis to unite the West to the rest of the world (up until now it’s behaved either as an armed landlord, a mob boss or a deranged killer, and that includes the European colonial project called Israel).
    • People are fundamentally kind hearted and prosocial, but unexamined trauma, pettiness and immaturity, and an overall disregard for thought before action (a moral obligation, btw), keeps them from being who they were always supposed to be.
    • Hard labels don’t/rarely belong in this world, and never apply to people. If you wanna understand the universe and the people in it you’re gonna have to understand them as a collection of spectrums/ranges, not as singular adjectives and nouns that are either meaningless or overly exaggerated.
    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      do you believe that randomness exists?

      The universe and everything in it was made for a reason.

      I wonder how randomness would fit into this. I believe that randomness does exist and that order/causality has its limits.

      • YappyMonotheist
        link
        fedilink
        11 month ago

        Randomness? Or uncertainty? Cause I understand uncertainty (both epistemologically and physically, and more so the former than the latter), but it’s hard for me to understand randomness when everything comes from something that came before, forming a line of causes and effects (knowable and unknowable) from the beginning of the universe until today. Perhaps through quantum physics, idk, but I don’t think I need to understand it as long as I only take into consideration what happens after the collapse of the wave function, lol. I also understand that consciousness is a black box, and free will is evidently real (go diet or be faithful in your teenage yours, you’ll quickly discover your freedom as you’re fighting yourself) but is axiomatic and cannot be properly explained in words (it’s part of the terrain that cannot be represented in the map).

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 month ago

          I have read the following very beautiful explanation of randomness:

          You may very well assume that the universe is deterministic, i.e. one thing follows after another, but even if that is so, you still end up with infinitely many stars in the night sky, and you cannot predict their patterns and shapes from mere computational-prediction alone. You need to venture out into the night and see the stars for yourself in order to find their arrangement and yourself in the middle of it. That is what randomness is all about: The stars could have any pattern, but they have exactly one. The same applies for humans: Humans could have any character, but they have exactly one. The true human character causes free-will, and that is what you and me experience as the wonder of life.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    41 month ago
    • Humans are inherently lazy and mentally unflexible
    • Humans are inherently evil and the veil of civilisation is really really thin.
    • Humans are greedy in every aspect
    • There are some exceptions,but the above applies generally
    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      11 month ago

      If humans are inherently evil, why is evil not the dominant force in the world? One would assume that if everyone were indeed evil, greedy, and out for themselves our existence could only be anarchy.

      • Angry_Autist (he/him)
        link
        fedilink
        11 month ago

        hy is evil not the dominant force in the world?

        It is tho, capitalistic cruelty literally runs on the blood and sweat of the lower classes, if that isn’t evil I don’t know what is

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Who says it is not the dominant force? End stage capitalism is pretty close to anarchy and we will see what happens next.

        After 25 years in healthcare and humanitarian work you get a grim perspective.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          11 month ago

          If you were correct society as a whole would already exist as true anarchy, therefore humans are not inherently evil, greedy, or out for themselves. We could not coexist in any meaningful way if that were true.

          • Angry_Autist (he/him)
            link
            fedilink
            11 month ago

            I really don’t know where you get your assumptions from but they are terrible

            The only reason society exists is because of a fucktonne of rules going back several thousand years about how you are supposed to behave in a society

            If you want to see what barebones humans without societal rules, read up on feral children

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              11 month ago

              I really don’t know where you get your assumptions from but they are terrible

              I simply followed the logic from “The human population of over 8 billion is inherently evil, and greedy”, then determined that if that were true society couldn’t exist in the state it does now.

              The only reason society exists is because of a fucktonne of rules going back several thousand years about how you are supposed to behave in a society

              If everyone were as you claimed them to be (Inherently Evil, Greedy, etc) they would not abide by those rules and society would exist in anarchy. This is the logical conclusion of your assertion regarding general human behavior. This means that humans cannot be inherently evil because we currently do not exist in anarchy where everyone is doing and taking what they want.

              If you want to see what barebones humans without societal rules, read up on feral children

              If you want to see any animal at their worst, put them in a life or death survival situation.

              • Angry_Autist (he/him)
                link
                fedilink
                11 month ago

                The human population of over 8 billion is inherently evil, and greedy”, then determined that if that were true society couldn’t exist in the state it does now

                That is a baseless assumption, not a foundation for a logical argument. You have to change it into a question in order for it to be a hypothesis

                Otherwise you are just making stuff up and justifying it to sound good

                If you want to see any animal at their worst, put them in a life or death survival situation.

                Incorrect, and based of of feelings of what sounds good instead of truth.

                Humans at their worst is when they have power over other humans and consider them subhuman. This is not a baseless assumption like yours, but rather based off of history and psychology. A desperate person in a life or death situation may kill a few, but out of desperation not cruelty. A person with power over others he considers subhuman can kill MILLIONS