• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      714 days ago

      I assume you mean fascist propaganda over and above the right wing rabbit holes that already exist on YouTube….

      Ugh, this is terrible.

      • kratoz29
        link
        fedilink
        English
        514 days ago

        Fuck this place

        Are you implying you don’t use YT at all? Or you use it and choose to be unhappy with it?

        Just curious, I often get mad because they need to censor words, but not to the degrees to say 'fuck this place" and move to the other (unborn) alternative.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          214 days ago

          I’m not sure of what you mean at the end there.

          I see youtube content. I do not pay for it and they are likely unhappy that I get to use it as they get zero benefit from it.

        • Darren
          link
          fedilink
          English
          414 days ago

          Personally I don’t use YouTube the website at all at this point. I’m 100℅ Freetube and yt-dlp/Plex for watching the channels I like.

          • kratoz29
            link
            fedilink
            English
            414 days ago

            That’s fine, still YouTube at its core though.

        • ada
          link
          fedilink
          English
          814 days ago

          The alternatives are there. They don’t have the volume of course, but they’re very much born…

          • kratoz29
            link
            fedilink
            English
            314 days ago

            Yes they are, some from the very conception of YouTube perhaps, but they are not real alternatives a real alternative would be one where all your subscriptions also upload the same content there, it is totally not YT based and you get the same or similar ecosystem Google provides, I don’t think too many channels fit this.

            • ada
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1214 days ago

              I mean, if your requirement for a youtube alternative is that it’s as big as YouTube, you’re just guaranteeing that there will never be a YouTube alternative…

              • kratoz29
                link
                fedilink
                English
                214 days ago

                Yeah perhaps, we are here on Lemmy after all, which I consider a Reddit alternative, but with YouTube the thing is different because we follow individuals, and here we follow subjects, hopefully somebody can truly stand out against Google in the video field, a movement big enough to motivate content creators to check it out, the last thing I hear was about Odysee, which I think is a step in the right direction.

                • ada
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  514 days ago

                  Peertube is also a thing. Obviously, someone can’t make it on Peertube alone, but lots of folk out there upload to YouTube and to Peertube

    • Leon
      link
      fedilink
      English
      414 days ago

      Well yes. You obviously still can’t say “le dollar bean” without getting nuked from orbit. YouTube is a goodly Christian corporation after all, can’t have such content.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    43
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    “Free speech” under capitalism means the freedom to promote fascism, rascism, misogyny, homophobia, genocide, etc…

    But if you post half a second of a Disney movie, your account will be permanently deleted.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1313 days ago

    Great, now that 50% of a video can be a direct call for genocide, does that at LEAST mean I can use ONE instance of a “bad” word or speak of “icky” things like death and drug abuse without being demonized?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2514 days ago

    This is such bad news. I’m sympathetic to content creators who have to step on eggshells to please the algorithm/advertisers… But this?

    Yeah, this is not that. We all know who this is for.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      314 days ago

      almost all the right wing contents get pushed to the front. there are some that are also rw that is buried by the algorithim, because they are loud mouths, i wonder if this will change for them too.,

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    714 days ago

    Videos are allowed if “freedom of expression value may outweigh harm risk”

    oh it’s that easy huh. why didn’t we think of this before lol.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3214 days ago

    Do people still have to say unalive?

    Censorship is goddamn stupid. They should just tag content & let people decide what to filter.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      People have literally never had to say that.

      First off it was Tiktok, not YouTube, that started the “unalived” trend, but even then make no mistake, “killed,” “murdered,” “died,” etc has never been banned on tiktok either.

      What has been happening is that videos (on tiktok) with “potentially divisive content” are not being promoted by tiktok. You video will not get removed just for saying the word “killed” and will still be fully available for viewing by your followers, it just won’t be promoted on the For You page for strangers.

      And it’s fine if you still object to this, but we have to stop conflating the two. Not being promoting is not the same thing as being censored.

      Edit: I don’t know who downvoted this or why, but I’m right

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        Maybe you’re right: is there verification?

        Neither content policy (youtube or tiktok) clearly lays out rules on those words. I only find unverified claims: some write it started at YouTube, others claim TikTok. They claim YouTube demonetizes & TikTok shadowbans. They generally agree content restrictions by these platforms led to the propagation of circumspect shit like unalive & SA.

        TikTok policy outlines their moderation methods, which include removal and ineligibility to the for you feed. Given their policy on self-harm & automated removal of potential violations, their policy is to effectively & recklessly censor such language.

        Generally, censorship is suppression of expression. Censorship doesn’t exclusively mean content removal, though they’re doing that, too. (Digression: revisionism & whitewashing are forms of censorship.)

        Regardless of how they censor or induce self-censorship, they’re chilling inoffensive language pointlessly. While as private entities they are free to moderate as they please, it’s unnecessary & the effect is an obnoxious affront on self-expression that’s contorting language for the sake of avoiding idiotic restrictions.

  • CaptainBasculin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3514 days ago

    If only half of that leniency were granted to selfhosting tools and adblockers

  • dindonmasker
    link
    fedilink
    English
    514 days ago

    I’m gessing that’s not gonna positively impact the people i watch and instead go towards some dumb shits.

  • Brewchin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    514 days ago

    “Muh freedums profit” outweighs life. The silent bit spoken aloud. Cool cool.

    As expected from this timeline and this garbage conglomerate.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5714 days ago

    Can we talk about adblockers, or is that still somehow worse than nazi shit?

    Btw they removed a popular Youtuber’s “Degoogle Your Life” series lmfao (Linus Tech Tips). But a far-right thinnly-veiled racist video? All a’okay according to Google.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    714 days ago

    youtube shadowbanning, demonitization and censorship is the most retarded shit that’s ever happened to the internet. the whole website is videos and comments of people who cater to kids and commercial advertisers and cant say shit.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1614 days ago

    We will (still) allow children’s cartoon characters to be mutilated and put into explicit situations and then push them as child friendly, but how dare you use a swear in the first 15 seconds of a video or say the work kill.