For years, there has been a lot of backlash against the “objectification of showers”, which i can totally understand because it’s a “condescending” term that looks at showers like objects, not as actual places of epiphany.

But the same is happening with the concept of “showerthoughts”: If ideas are referred to as “showerthoughts”, that means that they are being reduced to their hygenic circumstances; to their ability to shower.

That is a condescending term. The view should be that showers are good places for thoughts first, and places to wash your junk second. Thoughts deserve showers, and a good wash, not because they’re showerthoughts, but because they come from showers. That is how showers should be looked at.

  • snooggumsEnglish
    12•26 days ago

    Did you run a lame joke through an AI and post the output?

    If not, get outside because you might have a carbon monoxide leak.

      • snooggumsEnglish
        4•26 days ago

        Thanks, that actually makes it even worse than gibberish. Not because it couldn’t have been funny, just that it is so incoherent.

      • snooggumsEnglish
        2•26 days ago

        If you flipped showers and shower thoughts in the first paragraph I think it would have worked. Not sure if the second could be saved.

        For years, there has been a lot of backlash against the “objectification of shower thoughts”, which i can totally understand because it’s a “condescending” term that looks at shower thoughts like objects, not as actual places of epiphany.

    • Pudutr0ñOP
      2•25 days ago

      Well, enjoy, but if my post starts to seem like an acceptable submission to you, you might want to get mids next time.

      • @[email protected]English
        1•25 days ago

        Given the state of things around here, we’re all at the “we get what we can get” phase=))))