Seriously though, the USA is virtually always bad.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    352 years ago

    I’d hate on any country that was the bloodthirsty, manipulative, living incarnation of capitalist interests at the world level, the US just happens to be that.

  • cosecantphi [he/him, they/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    50
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Absolutely, how can it possibly matter whether any given communist is specifically an anarchist or ML or whatever when the US is the global hegemon? People who believe in any of these ideologies trying to enact radical change are going to get crushed under the United States’ boot all the same.

    Taking down the US is a prerequisite for coming anywhere close to communism, it’s not possible otherwise. Therefore left unity with the number one goal of weakening the US should be our highest priority. Russia losing the Ukraine proxy war will not make the lives of Russian LGBT people better. Nor will it make it any easier for leftists to take back control of the country. But Russia winning the Ukraine proxy war will certainly hurt the ability of the US and NATO to suppress leftist movements outside the imperial core.

  • barrbaric [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    56
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    5 hour old post

    300 comments

    Good LORD what is happening in there.

    EDIT: now 8 hours, 454 comments. sweat

  • SpiderFarmer [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    632 years ago

    My new thing is just telling people I don’t like countries that regularly bomb hospitals. It’s 50/50 on people then defending the US even harder.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      yeah that’s a good rul- wait that’s literally all of them with a working military

      • ped_xing [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        402 years ago

        Is this some sort of misguided american unexceptionalism where you think every other country is also doing wars in a billion places?

        • ProxyTheAwesome [comrade/them]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          I’ve seen this rhetorical tactic taken up by neoliberals and left libs when arguing on behalf of imperialism.

          “This is American exceptionalism to say the CIA and the US military are all powerful and the sole cause for 50+ coups and invasions. You are denying the agency of foreign nations to be fascist on their own by saying America installed all the fascists”

          It’s like they are trying to use anti-Americanism to argue pro-Americanism. It’s really a great tactic for muddying the waters and confusing everything by using a left rhetorical tactic to defend the fascist American empire

      • SpiderFarmer [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        252 years ago

        Yeah, I suppose at this point it’s harder to find countries that haven’t. Though the US and NATO-aligned nations do have a certain knack when it comes to atrocities.

      • Fuckass [none/use name]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        262 years ago

        The difference is that the US portrays itself as the bastion of freedom, democracy, and justice. With that logic, it makes sense if Russia or Syria or whoever else bombs innocent people because they’re barbarians who don’t value democracy.

        But when the bastion of democracy, freedom, and justice drone strikes an American and random bystanders; drone strikes dozens of children and community leaders; drone strikes a bunch of doctors; spies on citizens and allies; illegally occupies an island to torture Muslims for decades before releasing them; kill citizens who are caring for their communities using leftist ideology; funds cartels and death squads to massacre labor activists and leftists in exchange for letting them traffic drugs; drop more bombs than in WWII on small countries, then rape and massacre their villagers; assassinate other democratically elected leaders; and no one is ever punished significantly for it, then maybe it’s time to stop blindly worshipping it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          All countries portray themselves well. European countries less than other Western ones, but Russia and China also cultivate a specific image of protectors of a lifestyle.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              What does that have to do with image cultivation?

              They’ve been less military active in force projection, so probably not many yet. But I’m sure they’ll get their chance as they become a super power with global power projection.

              Actually, they’ve at least flooded their own hospitals, I wonder if they’ve accidentally bombed any with failing rocket stages?

              • Sephitard9001 [he/him]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                192 years ago

                Okay. The U.S. is the largest power with the largest global power projection. China might also become a large power with global power projection. This is bad because they might bomb hospitals. This means the U.S. is bad because they do bomb hospitals. This means that China might as well be just as bad as America. This means that Ukraine might as well be just as bad as Russia because they also bomb hospitals.

                So where is this going exactly? We’re still left with “America does bad shit at a larger scale way more often” even when you imagine China doing the same thing in an alternate reality. Is this a useful line of reason? I can justify literally anything doing this.

              • RedDawn [he/him]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                212 years ago

                It’s not logical for you to defend the US as global superpower by asserting, without evidence, that China might also do the same bad things if they could. They haven’t done those things and you’d need to provide compelling evidence that they have plans to do so. If not, you’re inventing a completely false equivalence out of whole cloth.

    • MCU_H8ER2 [none/use name]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      352 years ago

      I told my (sorta) friend that Obama oversaw a bombing of a Doctors Without Borders hospital and his only response was a smug ‘well it wasn’t on purpose’.

        • robinn2 [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          292 years ago

          It was a result of the U.S. purposely undoing progressive reform in Afghanistan[*] and backing extremists to draw the USSR in and provoke a slaughter (then lying about it and saying they only funded extremists afterwards, only to admit this later); the U.S. then returned to assert control of the middle east due to oil pipeline plans/natural gas reserves. Oh and also the U.S. used the economic system that they had set up during occupation to starve Afghanis after they left. This wasn’t some silly accident, it was part of a plan that no matter what meant the destruction of Afghanistan and the murder of hundreds of thousands. It doesn’t matter if it was directly “on purpose.”

          [*] US State Department Memorandum six months before the Soviet invasion: “The United States’ larger interest…would be served by the demise of the Taraki regime, despite whatever setbacks this might mean for future social and economic reform in Afghanistan… The overthrow of the DRA [Democratic Republic of Afghanistan] would show the rest of the world, particularly the Third World, that the Soviet’s view of the socialist course of history as being inevitable is not accurate” (reproduced in Cockburn and St. Clair’s Whiteout, pp. 262-63).

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            Thanks for the context. I agree that if the war is unjust, the individual events should have been avoided and are culpable to the one who is perpetrating the injustice.

            I’ll need to look into it more carefully, but that looks pretty convincing that the US was unjust to get involved.

        • somename [she/her]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          282 years ago

          The US was the one facilitating the violence, so it being “accidental” doesn’t matter. If I shoot a gun randomly into a crowd, it doesn’t matter if I didn’t actually mean to hit anyone.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            I mean hospitals can be set up anywhere and enemy combatants can hide in hospital buildings. You’ll need to go a little deeper.

            • CyborgMarx [any, any]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              282 years ago

              That hospital wasn’t just “set up” anywhere and enemy combatants weren’t hiding in there and even if they were, you dont bomb hospitals, that’s a warcrime

              Seriously wtf is wrong with you?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 years ago

                I don’t know the event your taking about, that’s why I’m asking for more information.

                • CyborgMarx [any, any]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  242 years ago

                  You don’t anything about the subject yet you still felt comfortable opening your punk-ass mouth about it

                  Kick rocks shitlib

                • Egon [they/them]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  232 years ago

                  You’re not asking for more information, you barge in and opine as if you are presenting a valid concern. Have some humility

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 years ago

                I said you’ll need to go deeper. Where in the command chain did the error happen? Or was it commanded from the top? Using munitions on hospitals usually isn’t as efficient as command centers, so it might actually be a mistake.

                Wait, are you actually anti Russian aggression? Yay! Could you help me out explaining in this thread that it actually isn’t okay for Russia to invade?

                • Again, fucking ghoul. Lives are a toy to you to be thrown around to smear your enemies is that it? Arabic lives are worthless, honorary aryans are exceptions?

                  I don’t want the war to happen, and that means both sides need to come together for a peace agreement. Invading another country, although with sense considering the geopolitical implications, was still a terrible thing. This is the position of Hexbear. You guys just stick on the parts where we say ukraine needs to pay reparations as well.

                  The bombing of donbass was insanely inhumane. There was no reason to do that! Russia does not have the subversive ability to prop up such complex movements. They cannot claim that they are just russian soldiers. the separatists have been asking for referendum since the fall of the Soviets. There should have been a renegotiation of the borders of the post soviet republics at the very least, they were made with the other republics.

                  The mess didn’t start with putin, it started with the fall of the soviet union. An entity with which, all the republics would be without war, and would be working together for the advancement of peace and mutual prosperity.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            That’s actually a good question. It’s worse if it’s malicious, but it’s still terrible if it’s accidental. The situation never should have been able to arise, preferably because the war never started.

  • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    192 years ago

    If you give me one person who calls themselves a socialist but believes the US state department’ line on all America’s rivals, and a second person who has mever even heard the word “socialism” but simply ontologicaɔly hates and opposes America through some arcane grudge, the second person will always be a better socialist, even accidentally.

  • MCU_H8ER2 [none/use name]OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    592 years ago

    Wow. I’m just now seeing that one courageous lib just took on every user of Hexbear. There are rumors it might be Aaron Sorkin.