Does the reddit style format inherently make for a toxic environment? Or is it a culture of toxicity from the influx of reditors? For lack of a beter example, on stackoverflow, when someone down votes you, it comes with a comment saying how to improve. On mastodon, people can’t downvote you. These platforms are a joy to use, lemmy is depressing if you post. Its depressing because every post or comment, no mater the quality comes with downvotes, and usually no criticism to accompany it, you are left not knowing if youve made a mistake, or if its just trolls, bots, or idiots. At the end you feel insulted not improved. What do you think?

  • cakeistheanswer
    link
    fedilink
    32 years ago

    It’s a distilled version of ‘the wisdom of the crowds’. With all the dog piling that comes with reactions to things that are pointed at the wrong audience. There’s generally some people with baggage in there somewhere who will take issue, and you get downvoted.

    However, what’s always interesting about these platforms is where good ideas rise, where they come from, and how controversial they are, all of which you lose with the twitter/mastodon architecture.

    It may be easier to find your crowd, but how useful is that to you depends on what you use your online presence for.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    9
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    During my time on reddit, I’ve learnt to appreciate downvotes. Silent feedback is much better than passive-aggressive replies that serve no purpose other than letting the person vent out.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I got majorly downvoted once for sharing my opinion on not wanting to travel to a foreign country alone as a woman. A lot of flippant comments too. Like okay, this is not the sub for me. I still can’t believe I was attacked like I was.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      idk, it sounds good, but to me its a lot like getting a grade with no comments (for the sake of example)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    812 years ago

    Just post what you want to post and ignore the votes. A few downvotes is to be expected. Try not to read into them so much.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    472 years ago

    Mastodon was very depressing for me, this follower centric self presentation stuff is super not my style, it don’t want it to be about me, I most likely suck but I say smart things some times, so I want it to be about the stuff I say.

    Plus I don’t mind being downvoted into oblivion. I actually think that this can be a good thing. It means that there was something at least controversial about what I posted so I might be wrong or have to argue better.

    Lastly, mastodon is too much safe space and filter bubble. I want to read things from people that I disagree with and I want to argue with them in good faith. When I tried this on mastodon, I got misquoted, blocked, harassed… You name it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      I disagree. Not completely, but about getting downvoted. Unless you are being an asshole, or ignoring the rules of the community, it’s telling you not that you posted something controversial, but that you are surrounded by toxic assholes, and that you should leave.

      People give idiots a lot of leeway. I’m not old, but at 37 I feel old enough that I have no patience whatsoever for idiots and assholes. I want to surround myself only with people that have a brain. And everyone else can just get fucked.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    112 years ago

    Imo, downvotes is just a disagreement. Being offended by it sounds like a “you” problem, we all have to deal with it.

    Upvotes normally give me answers I need for at that moment. Downvotes makes me reassess myself.

    I dont think you must read to much into the downvotes. Understand the situation why people might have downvoted you, understand why other people get upvoted, assess the situation. And most of all, understand that not everybody will always agree with you

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      What? people wont agree with me? LIES! (<-- that is a joke). I’m not offended, and i agree, i here, am a truth seeker looking for insight, thanks!

  • alaxitoo
    link
    fedilink
    202 years ago

    I barely posted on Reddit due to the thought of people hating what I said or posted 😊 I think here is more friendly since it’s not huge, I share what I like and if people don’t agree that’s cool! As long as it makes someone happy it’s worth it ✨

  • Rikudou_Sage
    link
    fedilink
    212 years ago

    Someone praising Stack Overflow, that’s a new one. The most criticized thing about SO is the toxicity and elitism of the users. Downvoting almost always comes with no explanation there.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Well hold on there, im not tryna praise them. I think we need a free and federated alternative. I only mean to say that an answer always has some verbal feedback on it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        62 years ago

        The incrediblely low quality of the feedback is legendary there, though.

        “How do I X?”

        “Do not X. - Fin”

        • Cybersteel
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          That’s the wrong way to go about things. You show them a clearly incorrect example of a code you need help with but say that it’s a good code and don’t believe anyone can do better. People will jump over themselves to correct you and provide helpful solutions.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            Ah yes, Murphy’s Law. Instead of asking a question, just post the wrong answer and someone will come along to correct you.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    15
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I’m thinking you care too much about the thoughtless reactions of anonymous strangers.
    Remember… In this game, the points don’t matter.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      92 years ago

      its strange because its not the disapproval that gets me, its not knowing why. I guess the lesson is that if someone did not even say why, its not really something anyone actually cared about.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        This is exactly it. They don’t care about your post or you or anyone really. For them, it just feels good to bring down others.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          i hope/believe that the intent is rarely malicious, that its not really a significant thing at all on that side.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    32 years ago

    Thankfully the instance I’m on doesn’t have downvotes. I find what leads to toxic communities is when admins don’t remove toxic content or users.

  • Schwim Dandy
    link
    fedilink
    42 years ago

    As a former Redditor, I can only say that I’ve not yet begun looking at votes. Why do you determine the value of your post based on that? Make your post, read and respond to people who comment and have a great day.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      02 years ago

      That is the trap, isnt it. Votes are an awful metric for approval, and approval inst always needed.

  • Dudewitbow
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    Not necessarily toxicity, but echo chambers. Echo chambers could then be used to be toxic.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      02 years ago

      At least here in the free world we have to manually build echo chambers and “The Algorithm” does not build them around us without our consent.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -142 years ago

    “Toxicity” is just like “racism”, newspeak to censor and bully, if you need to mention it you are the one doing the harm

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    The karma/upvote/downvote system encourages engagement and gives users an idea of how others perceive their posts. It also encourages people to think about their posts and it helps keep garbage from clogging up the feed.

    The problem is that posts are now “attention-centric” and that might lead to people posting stuff that’s more controversial or even “rage-bait” because it gets a reaction.

    But honestly though, the toxicity was always there. It’s just that now people express it with an arrow click instead of a flame post calling out the OP’s mom.

    I think anonymity or at least the perception of it on the internet breeds toxicity because it’s easier to hurt someone when neither party has to look each other in the eye.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    17
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    For lack of a beter example, on stackoverflow, when someone down votes you, it comes with a comment saying how to improve. … These platforms are a joy to use

    I don’t know what part of the internet you are from, but where I am from, Stackoverflow is looked down on as the quintessential example of toxic behaviour.

    I’ve found some of the most dismissive people in tiny stack exchange groups, and experienced similar unexplained downvotes.

    What SO, Reddit, and Lemmy maybe all have in common I think, is people tend to agree or disagree based on their convictions, as opposed to agreeing or disagreeing as a means of interaction.

    I guess this puts the conflict and disagreement front and center. But at least then I know where people stand.

    Perhaps it’s important to not take opinions too personally, and remember that incencere agreement has its own problems.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      I disagree about SO, though I am not a fan of it for other reasons. Interesting thought about acting on convictions. Thanks.