• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1742 years ago

    This is specifically Bavaria. They also recently found out that their vice president has a past as a Nazi and the reaction of their president was essentially “Oh no. Anyway…”. So, yeah, if you considered visiting the Oktoberfest, maybe reconsider.

    • Arda
      link
      fedilink
      142 years ago

      DEUTSCHLAND 😎💪🏿💪🏿💪🏿

    • fusio
      link
      fedilink
      92 years ago

      what is not going to Oktoberfest gonna do?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        722 years ago

        being out of reach of nazis or conservative christians can increase safety and well-being

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        362 years ago

        Eh, I don’t expect random tourists to be locked up by the fascists, nor do I necessarily expect the not-quite-fascists to distance themselves from the fascists, just from losses in the tourism industry.

        I’m mostly just saying, there’s tons of places you could be traveling to and “drinking beer with fascists” isn’t quite as attractive anymore.

    • Chariotwheel
      link
      fedilink
      382 years ago

      Bavaria is a traditionally very conservative state. The Conservative party is ruling with an iron grip for decades.

      • Gosplan14_the_Third [none/use name]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        162 years ago

        But yeah.

        Additional Context: The state government of Bavaria (and several others around that same period, with similar ideas) passed a controversial reform of police laws in 2017-2018 (It was polemically called “The strictest police law since 1945”).

        It included changes such as:

        • increased allowance of use of personal data by the police forces.

        • allowing the police to openly film and photograph people participating in public gatherings.

        • allowing the police to infringe on postal secrecy and to confiscate mail without a person’s knowledge. (if given permission by the courts)

        • allowing the use of police spies. Including even entering people’s homes if given permission.

        As well as making previous restrictions such as on “probable danger” way more lax.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          They should put some kind of mark on all those suspicious people and their house, to also let other people know who lives among them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      51
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Oly in Bavaria. In every other German State this can only be done for a few days max in extreme situations.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      382 years ago

      I can’t read German, but we have a similar legal system in the Netherlands.

      Most likely, these people committed some crime during a previous protest, such as illegally entering private property or vandalism. Often they will get sentences that are conditional.

      If there is evidence to believe they are conspiring to commit a similar illegal act, then the conditional part of the sentence gets triggered.

      • Square Singer
        link
        fedilink
        562 years ago

        Nope, it’s actually only that the police has reason to believe that they might commit a crime.

        No need for them to be prior offenders or anything. The police can arrest anyone at any time if they believe you might commit a crime. And even comparatively minor things like blocking traffic counts.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            182 years ago

            It doesn’t sound like it. Conspiracy means there’s documented evidence of a plan and motive to commit a crime. This doesn’t seem like it meets that standard.

            • Neuromancer
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 years ago

              Thanks. I have no clue about German law. Oddly even though America has a large German population historically, our laws are based on English, French and Spanish laws.

          • Square Singer
            link
            fedilink
            52 years ago

            The difference in regards to a conspiracy charge is that you don’t need a conspiracy behind it.

            In Germany, there are actually 18 different laws regarding this, since that part of the law is federated. So each state of Germany (plus the federal police and the federal criminal police) has it’s own law regarding under what circumstances they are allowed to arrest someone before they committed a crime and for how long.

            Originally, these laws had two purposes:

            • Stop someone from committing a serious crime
            • Stop someone from doing harm to themselves

            And as such, these laws used to have tight limits on when they can apply and for how long people are allowed to be arrested.

            A case could be made for these laws. E.g. if someone announces online that they are going to shoot kids at a school, it would be totally justified to quickly bag that guy before he kills children. Waiting for a court order might not be fast enough to save the would-be victims.

            But then they started to expand the reasons why someone can be arrested and for how long.

            In Bavaria, for example, it’s enough that someone carries items that can be used for criminal purposes. And there they can jail people for up to two months without a charge.

            There have been cases where someone was put in jail for two months for carrying items like crowbars or ropes in their backpacks.

          • SokathHisEyesOpen
            link
            fedilink
            English
            102 years ago

            “Okay, so what cool plot idea do we use to determine who might commit crimes?”

            “IDK, just anyone maybe? People who use the internet?”

        • Kalash
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Well they did identify themselves as members of a group that publicly announced it would continue to commit crimes.

          • Square Singer
            link
            fedilink
            52 years ago

            Well, no. Blocking traffic is no crime. It’s just a misdemeanor (Verwaltungsübertretung).

            • Kalash
              link
              fedilink
              4
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              It’s really something for the lawyers but it could be considered “Nötigung” (§ 181 StGB) and/or “Gefährlicher Eingriff in den Straßenverkehr” (§ 315b StGB).

              Pretty sure if it’s in the StGB it’s a “crime” (Straftat).

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 years ago

              In English, at least for the US, there are typically only misdemeanors and felonies, and both are crimes. There are also violations, but those are usually civil, not criminal (parking tickets, for example).

              • Square Singer
                link
                fedilink
                32 years ago

                Sorry, mistranslation. I meant violations. Over here we only split into violations and crimes.

                Violations cover most things done with a car/in traffic without actively harming someone.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 years ago

                  Yeah, in English (in the US, generally) we’d call that a civil violation. Or a civil action where a lawsuit is brought by a private citizen, like suing someone for damaging your property. It’s against the law, but probably not going to be prosecuted by the government.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      922 years ago

      Kind of. Iirc it’s a very controversial practice and whenever the police pulls it out in a public case it gets protested again (for good reason). Also, even if the practice is legal right now, there’s a lot of limitations to it. Obviously it’s nudging the ethical boundaries of police work either way.

      • SokathHisEyesOpen
        link
        fedilink
        English
        332 years ago

        Maybe they should arrest everyone that might protest against this before they arrest the other people that might protest against climate change. But then people might protest against that too. I guess everyone is under arrest! You’re all under arrest. Get in the hole!

    • Dojan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      262 years ago

      There is a law that lets the police take people into custody to prevent terror attacks, but that’s not the case here.

      Complaints have been lodged before, but hitherto dismissed. And final clarity on the legality of the procedure is still pending.

      It helps to read the article.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        272 years ago

        but that’s not the case here

        But this is in fact how the police argues. Climate protests are terror attacks (since they disrupt traffic) and therefore this is justified.

        Pretty sure the Bundesverfassungsgericht (basically our supreme court) will shut this practice down – just like all the other times Bavarian laws have been ruled unconstitutional – but Bavaria doesn’t care. They scrap the law and replace it with a similar unconstitutional version and wait 2 years until the Bundesverfassungsgericht rules it unconstitutional and so on.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          162 years ago

          It’s basically our texas or florida, depending on your pov. It’s a place with great nature, interesting culture but also very crude beliefs and you either like the culture or you dont. Most importantly, police is said to be a pot rougher over there and politics is pretty conservative as well.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    262 years ago

    The Germans have a history of these things, they try to pretend it’s all in the past but here they are right back to their old ways. It’s unacceptable for anyone to be detained in this way, period.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      19
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Yeah, us evil, evil Germans … lol

      Please educate yourself: There are rightwing tendencies even in your country, but they’re coloured differently.

      If you’d take a closer look at world politics you’d find that there is an alarming trend concerning exactly this.

      Best example would be Italy - they’ve just elected a right-wing party and all hells breaking loose as they’ve started restructuring the social security system over there, leaving many, many families moneyless. Without any warning in advance. And that’s just the start.

      China is still on with their genocide - the Uigur must die it seems, no matter what. There’s still concentration camps.

      I could go on for hours.

      But yeah. You’re right. Us Germans are notorious and blind towards our history.

    • Dojan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      It’s absolutely better to let people be free and do whatever they want, than to apprehend them ahead of time when they’re suspected of planning to carry out a crime.

      Just imagine if the people who carried out the 11th September attack had been caught in the planning stage? Then tomorrow would just be a normal day instead of a sad day of remembrance.

      That would’ve been outrageous!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        382 years ago

        Ah yes, protesting destruction of the environment and terrorism killing thousands, definitely equivalent acts

        • Dojan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          So either Germany has like 30 climate protesters, or these particular protesters are thought to be up to something and thus detained ahead of time to prevent them from causing damage either to people or property.

          It’s worth noting that

          1. The legality of this is being disputed and,
          2. The decision to detain these people is labelled as controversial by the article

          You can bet your arsehole that there’ll be people protesting at the event, and protesting hasn’t magically been made illegal.

          If you’ve been caught trying to hijack a plane in the past, you might find yourself being under extra scrutiny next time you try to fly. That’s entirely on you.

          I frequently call for the heads of big oil CEOs and enabling politicians, I don’t think I’ll ever be let within a kilometre of either type of people.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            162 years ago

            I’m begging you to take a look at the dangerous nefarious terroristic acts Letzte Generation usually engages in. They do non-violent road blockades. Sometimes they chain themselves to stuff. They might even spray some paint on a private jet sitting in a lot. These are the criminal masterminds Germany needs to crack out pre-crime for. It’s the mildest bullshit you can imagine.

            • Dojan
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              And what is that going to achieve? Because they glue themselves to the autobahn, or chain themselves to a dozen cars, people will magically stop driving?

              Then what? How is people not driving affecting the grand scheme of things?

              It’s not. Do something useful, like get to the people responsible. Idiotic stunts like super gluing yourself to a table is making a mockery of the entire climate movement.

              The suffragettes fucked with census and blew shit up. It’s time to take a leaf from their playbook.

              • qevlarr
                link
                fedilink
                17
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                “They must have been planning something terrible”

                “They weren’t”

                “Well they should have!”

                🤔

                You’re just being contrarian.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        152 years ago

        Unironically would be an awful world if people could be arrested for suspicion of wanting to potentially someday do a crime

        • Dojan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          You’re right. It’s the world we live in, and it’s absolute garbage for a wide range of reasons.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      19
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Half of the voting population. Less people actually agree with conservatives in the US than our voting splits indicate. They are either indifferent or have been suppressed from voting.

    • mar_k [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      They want protestors to be quiet and in the distance. God forbid they inconvenience people to get their voices heard

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        Sadly the US is exactly the same, and even demands permits for protest. But we’re teh freeeeeisst evaeva by crackie

  • UlyssesT [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    79
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    PRE-CRIME, JUST LIKE IN THE SCI-FI TREATS

    soypoint-1 no-mouth-must-scream soypoint-2

    EDIT: reddit-logo is leaking again; apparently even emojis can get pulled over by the Pedantry Police. 🚔 berdly-actually 🚓

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      What does this have to do with “I have no mouth and i must scream”?

      I can’t remember any “pre-crime” in it. Just an AI torturing people for his amusement.

      • UlyssesT [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 years ago

        I know.

        I was just stretching the application of the emoji to summarize bad futuristic outcomes because there isn’t a Minority Report related emoji yet.

          • bigboopballs [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            142 years ago

            You can’t just use any random emoji you want, that doesn’t make any sense.

            the absolute state of lemee

          • UlyssesT [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            112 years ago

            I’ve used it for well over a year.

            You are the very first person to ever complain about how I used it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              Fair enough. I don’t believe it is a very popular story so that might be the reason.

              Why is there even an Emoji for the book? Does it come up that often on hexchat?

              • UlyssesT [he/him]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                92 years ago

                I don’t believe it is a very popular story so that might be the reason.

                It was popular enough for me to have known about it before I saw the emoji.

                Why is there even an Emoji for the book? Does it come up that often on hexchat?

                Because the Hexbear creator of emojis decided it’d be fun to add it, and it was almost immediately used to summarize bleak and terrible future outcomes, especially in reference to this moment mocking the tendency of tech billionaires to miss the point of the fiction they consume and make announcements about how they want to make the bad things in such fiction come true:

                https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/002/386/548/92f.jpg

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  1
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  Odd, but alright then. Maybe it makes more sense the the “emoji” renders properly.

                  Have you read the story? If not, do it. It’s pretty great and only around 40 min long.

                  Harlan Ellison made an audiobook version I listened to, while also reading it at the same time: https://youtu.be/dgo-As552hY

                  You can also borrow the book for free here: https://archive.org/details/ihavenomouthimus0000harl

                  Or just get it for free in many other places.

                  Edit: oh and what is stormfront? Edit 2: the “I have no mouth…” game is also pretty great and was given away for free on GOG a while back so you might already have it, if you keep track of those things. That game is inspired by the book but it is mainly it’s own story.

  • Tankiedesantski [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    372 years ago

    First they came for the environmentalists, and I said nothing because I didn’t want my commute to be inconvenienced…

    • kingthrillgore
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      Oktoberfest! Those days were a real gas!

      This is the worst thing i’ve ever said online.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      To be fair, in this case 16 people are already free since yesterday. The other 9 have been taken into custody while demonstrating. Not because of the demonstrating itself, but for various reasons, ranging from resistance against the police to cases where they technically endangered someones live by blocking emergency vehicles. They will be in jail for another 19 days. Another reason for longer jail sentences are them being impossible to learn, aka. not changing behaviour from previous incidents.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    172 years ago

    I find it funny, you talk about freedom, Europeans will defend their governments as free, shit on the US, defend government power in the name of protecting the public, but then, preemptively jailing people, like previous authoritarian states of Europe would do, and they’re all surprised pikachu face. I doubt they’ll ever get it, Europeans are lemmings.

    Except the French. The French light shit on fire when their government displeases them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      332 years ago

      This is generalising a bit much done you think? This is like saying all US states are the same, but more outrageous as they’re completely separate countries with different cultures, languages, and governments

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        well, you have a history of authoritarianism and warrantless detention in many, many European countries, the US is all entirely subject to the US constitution which explicitly forbids warrantless searches, detention absent due process and things like that. It has a few blind spots, and the rules are broken, but generally can be corrected and the culprits prosecuted. Detention in Germany for example without a jury trial and evidence of illegal activity is perfectly legal, as it is in the UK and almost every other European country so long as it protects the general welfare or some other such broad meaningless condition.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          162 years ago

          constitution which explicitly forbids warrantless searches

          Bullshit. I have been arrested for a warrantless search.

          It has a few blind spots, and the rules are broken, but generally can be corrected and the culprits prosecuted.

          Absolute dog shit take. Sounds like the law has been favouring you. Most aren’t so lucky.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          262 years ago

          US does shit like this all the time. Guantanamo bay ring a bell? There are still people there who haven’t been convicted of a crime.