• onceuponaban
      link
      fedilink
      152 years ago

      Catbox claims to keep files forever. I find this claim dubious, what’s the catch?

      • °˖✧ ipha ✧˖°
        link
        fedilink
        212 years ago

        The ‘catch’ is that running a service like this gets expensive fast and it’s the same with all the free image hosting sites.

        Catbox is run entirely by donations with anything left covered by the owner out of their own pocket. If the donations dry up, it will eventually have to shut down. Again, this isn’t unique to Catbox, all the free sites could easily suffer the same fate.

      • Virkkunen
        link
        fedilink
        82 years ago

        There are files I’ve uploaded to them since their service started that are still there.

        After a while, files go into a “cold storage” and there’s a wait until the server retrieves it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      I feel like self hosted is where most linked images eventually disappear. Much more so than image hoster platforms - where it obviously varies too, some disappear.

  • 𝙚𝙧𝙧𝙚
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    I like that imgur removes exif data, any recommendations that do that too?

    I took a look at a few posted and they don’t appear to do so.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    222 years ago

    It’s kind of crazy how these popular services are always insistent on killing themselves off with these horrible changes.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      282 years ago

      Those services are seldom profitable. Especially as they get larger, their costs rise. Meanwhile, imgur, as a service that provides embedded content, has little opportunity to make money off of their users. They rely on infinite growth and ever more people investing money into them to keep financially viable.

      But there is no infinite growth and imgur has reached its limits. Now they need to bind users to their platform and rely on ad revenue. So old content gets purged, along with nsfw content, in order to entice advertisers.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    182 years ago

    Man, I remember when the imagur guy made a post saying hi everyone I made a site we can use for pictures on Reddit. How’ long ago was that?

  • Bappity
    link
    fedilink
    62 years ago

    has anyone got hosting sites for uploading videos/GIFs?

    • LollerCorleoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      They look good. Large size limit of 200 mb and NSFW-friendly. But unfortunately, according to their FAQ, they are blocked in Australia, UK, Ireland, Iran and Afghanistan (the latter two are not surprising though).

      • BuxtonWater
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        Not blocked in the UK here for me. Sounds like an ISP specific thing.

      • Pamasich
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        they are blocked in Australia, UK, Ireland, Iran and Afghanistan

        Seems to be blocked for a friend from the philippines too iirc. Combined with other replies saying they can access it from some of these, I assume that list is outdated.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          112 years ago

          Same here in Australia. Might only be a select few smaller ISPs that have blocked it, ie the ones the government can bully easily.

          • VicFic!
            link
            fedilink
            32 years ago

            It’s seems like it’s only a dns level block, so changing to non-isp dns might help you bypass that restriction.

            • joshinya
              link
              fedilink
              22 years ago

              Also in Aus here, using ISP DNS, not blocked. I think what you generally find is that most ISP’s just don’t do the DNS blocks, even if they’re required to. Like you said, it’s very easily circumvented and also it just doesn’t lead to any measurable outcome other than the ISP customer’s dissatisfaction in some cases. It’s probably more profitable to retain the customers and deal with whatever regulatory blowback.

      • BrikoX
        link
        fedilink
        72 years ago

        They are a lot smaller than something like Imgur some they probably don’t have worldwide CDN to distribute images, so it will probably depend on the location where you are, but their offering of public API defintely outweights any possible slowdowns for me.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    52 years ago

    Can somebody explain on the purpose of these sites?

    The whole time when I was using reddit I would just upload from my gallery to the app, never had to use an image uploader website, it sounds like a pain to use.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      92 years ago

      That’s because you arrived when reddit already had its image hosting.
      Before you could only upload a link, so you had to find a hosting site.
      It’d be the same if lemmy didn’t have one.
      And in fact it’s like that for me, I didn’t configured pict-rs, so I can’t upload images to my lemmy instance, I need to configure it or use a hosting site.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Wow image-hosting is a thing. Why don’t they just have something so essential out of the box, is it expensive or something

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          Short answer is yes. Long answer is that with text it’s much easier to stamp out illegal activity because keyword searches are cheap while semantic searches in images are pretty good but extremely computationally expensive. You can’t just scan for illegal activity in images the same way you can nigh instantly scan a body of text for “illegal-site.com”.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            That makes a certain kind of sense but does that mean the filtering algorithm Facebook uses that targets NSFW photos in posts and group chats is very complicated and expensive? is it important for a site like reddit or Lemmy to scan for illegal activities oj a photo?

        • Choco1ateCh1p
          link
          fedilink
          10
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          It requires a lot of storage space. Much more than for just text.

          Also, additional liability for hosting images uploaded by literally anyone, that could depict abuse, or be copyrighted.

    • LollerCorleoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      -13
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Using them do add one or two extra steps before posting. Images can hog up server resources and using these third-party sites reduces the burden for the server of your instance which is run by volunteers/hobbyists with money often coming from their own pockets. Its just a nice thing to voluntarily do.

      • decadentrebel
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        On the other hand, it’s great that some instances have file size limits. It forces users to look at these image hosts instead of them just recklessly uploading images into the servers as if Lemmy is housed in a Palo Alto facility.

  • melroy
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    242 years ago

    You can just use fediverse (eg. kbin) to upload your image directly, without any of those instances?

    • genoxidedev1
      link
      fedilink
      192 years ago

      Uploading directly uses server resources which are voluntarily provided, that’s why using external providers and just posting links instead is usually better.

      • r00ty
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        It’s true, but there’s some pretty reasonably priced S3 compatible containers now. To the extent I’d only start getting concerned at the 1TB mark.

        Of course I also am not going to complain if people use hosting sites and prolong how long it takes to get to 1tb :p

    • Th4tGuyII
      link
      fedilink
      612 years ago

      Just because you can, doesn’t mean you should. The individual hosts of the Fediverse are limited on space, and jamming that limited space full of images, rather than using an external image hosting service, is worse for the sustainability of these spaces

      • El Barto
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        Shouldn’t this be a per instance policy? Why would the onus be on the poster?

        • LollerCorleoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          -62 years ago

          Because pretty much all instances are being run by volunteers and hobbyists, and not a for-profit who is profiting from your content. This is just something nice to do for reducing the resources they require to run the service.

          • El Barto
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            I understand that. You and I are decent human beings, but a lot of people are dicks. So the instance owners should be the ones active at protecting their resources.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        102 years ago

        Someone somewhere has to host the image. Realistically it should be the same people hosting the instance so you don’t run into cases where historical posts have all their images dropped. In an absolute ideal world everyone selfhosts their own images, but that’s an absolute fantasy.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        302 years ago

        In addition, help out your instance admins by resizing the image if you don’t need it in high resolution.

        Uploading a 250Kb file rather than a 2.5MB one makes a difference when thousands of users are doing it.

        • Deebster
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          Saving images as webp gives massive savings, and I think everyone can view them nowadays.

        • melroy
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          17
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          @aleph As an instance admin myself, we are looking into fine-tuning those settings to limit uploads of an x amount in file size. But are we are looking into some thumbnail library to reduce the image sizes indeed.

  • Deebster
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    I guess save it so that the actual image is rotated, not just via some metadata telling the viewer to do it.