• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    52 years ago

    Can somebody explain on the purpose of these sites?

    The whole time when I was using reddit I would just upload from my gallery to the app, never had to use an image uploader website, it sounds like a pain to use.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      92 years ago

      That’s because you arrived when reddit already had its image hosting.
      Before you could only upload a link, so you had to find a hosting site.
      It’d be the same if lemmy didn’t have one.
      And in fact it’s like that for me, I didn’t configured pict-rs, so I can’t upload images to my lemmy instance, I need to configure it or use a hosting site.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Wow image-hosting is a thing. Why don’t they just have something so essential out of the box, is it expensive or something

        • Choco1ateCh1p
          link
          fedilink
          10
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          It requires a lot of storage space. Much more than for just text.

          Also, additional liability for hosting images uploaded by literally anyone, that could depict abuse, or be copyrighted.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          Short answer is yes. Long answer is that with text it’s much easier to stamp out illegal activity because keyword searches are cheap while semantic searches in images are pretty good but extremely computationally expensive. You can’t just scan for illegal activity in images the same way you can nigh instantly scan a body of text for “illegal-site.com”.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            That makes a certain kind of sense but does that mean the filtering algorithm Facebook uses that targets NSFW photos in posts and group chats is very complicated and expensive? is it important for a site like reddit or Lemmy to scan for illegal activities oj a photo?

    • LollerCorleoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      -13
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Using them do add one or two extra steps before posting. Images can hog up server resources and using these third-party sites reduces the burden for the server of your instance which is run by volunteers/hobbyists with money often coming from their own pockets. Its just a nice thing to voluntarily do.

      • decadentrebel
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        On the other hand, it’s great that some instances have file size limits. It forces users to look at these image hosts instead of them just recklessly uploading images into the servers as if Lemmy is housed in a Palo Alto facility.

  • ZephyrXero
    link
    fedilink
    102 years ago

    I’ve been looking for a service that uses IPFS to get a more distributed solution in place. Although you need an HTTP proxy for anyone that doesn’t have the plugin or use a browser with support built in. There’s a service called Pinata, but it only lets you upload 100 files for free

    • FistfulOfStars
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      IPFS (or similar tech) is the only sustainable solution for media hosting on federated platforms.

      Permanence is important - old posts with dead media links is bad for society IMO - but we can’t expect volunteer instance admins to be held responsible for something as complex and expensive as permanent media hosting.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        While somewhat correct it still needs someone hosting your data, even if it’s you.

        Slightly off-topic:

        I never get why Ipfs is using these false claims about “uploading” to the Ipfs and having it “permanently” stored. In reality it’s just Torrent, someone has to have the file - if no one has, there is no file. In theory one could make the same file available again in the future but all the hashing settings have to match with the previous or you’ll get a different reference hash.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        The hardest part will always be moderation. It will be incredibly difficult to prevent smut and CSAM propagating without people actively monitoring what content is being hosted. But even if you assume random people have the time and are ok with seeing and reporting/filtering out that content, you’ll still never combat advanced cryptographic steganography techniques; a picture of a flower might have content hidden inside it somehow that encodes the bad content in a way that you’ll never find it. On top of that, moderation is work that no one wants to do for random content they don’t care about, but without people hosting content they don’t care about, links will die too quickly to be useful. Imagine if you posted an image to a niche community, and then had to keep your system on for hours, days, or weeks, ready to seed it to the one lurker who happens across it, and then maybe they also seed it.

        tl;dr it’s a very difficult problem…but honestly maybe AI breakthroughs can help with it

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    182 years ago

    Man, I remember when the imagur guy made a post saying hi everyone I made a site we can use for pictures on Reddit. How’ long ago was that?

  • melroy
    link
    fedilink
    242 years ago

    You can just use fediverse (eg. kbin) to upload your image directly, without any of those instances?

    • Th4tGuyII
      link
      fedilink
      612 years ago

      Just because you can, doesn’t mean you should. The individual hosts of the Fediverse are limited on space, and jamming that limited space full of images, rather than using an external image hosting service, is worse for the sustainability of these spaces

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        302 years ago

        In addition, help out your instance admins by resizing the image if you don’t need it in high resolution.

        Uploading a 250Kb file rather than a 2.5MB one makes a difference when thousands of users are doing it.

        • Deebster
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          Saving images as webp gives massive savings, and I think everyone can view them nowadays.

        • melroy
          link
          fedilink
          17
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          @aleph As an instance admin myself, we are looking into fine-tuning those settings to limit uploads of an x amount in file size. But are we are looking into some thumbnail library to reduce the image sizes indeed.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        102 years ago

        Someone somewhere has to host the image. Realistically it should be the same people hosting the instance so you don’t run into cases where historical posts have all their images dropped. In an absolute ideal world everyone selfhosts their own images, but that’s an absolute fantasy.

      • El Barto
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        Shouldn’t this be a per instance policy? Why would the onus be on the poster?

        • LollerCorleoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          -62 years ago

          Because pretty much all instances are being run by volunteers and hobbyists, and not a for-profit who is profiting from your content. This is just something nice to do for reducing the resources they require to run the service.

          • El Barto
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            I understand that. You and I are decent human beings, but a lot of people are dicks. So the instance owners should be the ones active at protecting their resources.

    • genoxidedev1
      link
      fedilink
      192 years ago

      Uploading directly uses server resources which are voluntarily provided, that’s why using external providers and just posting links instead is usually better.

      • r00ty
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        It’s true, but there’s some pretty reasonably priced S3 compatible containers now. To the extent I’d only start getting concerned at the 1TB mark.

        Of course I also am not going to complain if people use hosting sites and prolong how long it takes to get to 1tb :p

  • 𝙚𝙧𝙧𝙚
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    I like that imgur removes exif data, any recommendations that do that too?

    I took a look at a few posted and they don’t appear to do so.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    222 years ago

    It’s kind of crazy how these popular services are always insistent on killing themselves off with these horrible changes.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      282 years ago

      Those services are seldom profitable. Especially as they get larger, their costs rise. Meanwhile, imgur, as a service that provides embedded content, has little opportunity to make money off of their users. They rely on infinite growth and ever more people investing money into them to keep financially viable.

      But there is no infinite growth and imgur has reached its limits. Now they need to bind users to their platform and rely on ad revenue. So old content gets purged, along with nsfw content, in order to entice advertisers.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      I feel like self hosted is where most linked images eventually disappear. Much more so than image hoster platforms - where it obviously varies too, some disappear.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    Yes! Thank you, this fixed my gif post earlier that wouldn’t load from Imgur. Imgbb worked fine for what it is.

  • Call me Lenny/Leni
    link
    fedilink
    42 years ago

    Imgur hates my guts anyways. They are based on easily ignitable populism and then its people wonders why everyone acts like they’ve burnt all their bridges.

  • Trebach
    link
    fedilink
    32 years ago

    Before anyone mentions 0x0.st or ttm.sh as alternatives, both of them will delete your files within a year of being uploaded so do not use them for anything permanent.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    How on earth do I keep my photos from rotating in all of these?

    I take a picture on my phone in portrait. I upload it, it’s rotated to landscape. I look at the EXIF, pic on my phone says it’s rotated 90. If I delete that, it rotates to landscape. What do I need to do to keep it vertical?