• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    222 years ago

    If I can play videogames in my head while I’m at work, great. If my addict dopamine brain gets highjacked so that I don’t know how to do anything except consume ads then bad.

    • LinkOpensChest.wav
      link
      fedilink
      222 years ago

      It will be the latter, and if you complain then people will call you a “privacy nutjob” because it will be considered normal

      “Experiencing life without the chip is like stealing content”

      I can hear it now

      • darcyOP
        link
        fedilink
        182 years ago

        thats so true. “no-ones forcing you to get chipped (unless you want to work or buy anything or enter a mall or …)”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    182 years ago

    PC parts can’t even go few years without losing backwards compatibility (e.g. cpu sockets changing every few years). Last thing I need is for my physical body to incompatible with the newest and best stuff because I got a permanent implant when the tech wasn’t as evolved. This will always be the problem with invasive technology in my opinion.

        • rastilin
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          Even that wouldn’t be unworkable, it would be worse if you’re stuck with the brain equivalent of serial ports just before everyone switches to the USB standard.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      72 years ago

      So I have a cat chipped 15 years ago, and she can still operate modern devices with it - open doors, get food from a robot.

      Not all tech goes obsolete fast, there are legacy compatibility layers!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          No, the doors and robots have to be smart enough to operate for the cat.

          Source: Have a microchip cat door.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            22 years ago

            Please don’t insult cats, it’s cats who are smart enough to know how to use their chips! Robots and chips just react as they are programmed.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          Cats are already smart enough, they just find it easier to access the technology using their chips.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    142 years ago

    If it is advertised well, it will be the same as with smartphones nowadays. Companies won’t plant chips into human brains, people will pay to have chips planted into their brains and pay even more for yearly upgrades.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    92 years ago

    I think in a perfect world it could be really cool

    In this one however it’ll just be exploited

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 years ago

    Yea, “companies” shouldn’t. But I want a computer in my head eventually, so I can be a cyborg.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    42 years ago

    What? Why WOULDN’T everybody let the guy whose latest genius idea in a stunning sequence of brilliant business decisions was squeezing every twitter user for money in a service they previously got for free implant hardware into their brain? It’ll be just like a tesla: automated driving available next year since like 2010 or so (assuming it doesn’t fall apart, run over the elderly or burst into flames) in a hyperloop near you!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    322 years ago

    There is a non-zero chance that once they have a chip in your brain, they will find a way to stream ads in to it.

    For that reason, I’m out.

  • Phoenixz
    link
    fedilink
    252 years ago

    There is a long list of legit and or cook reasons to have a microchip in a brain. Controlling or assisting damaged brain structures, you can mitigate the symptoms.of Parkinsons, give vision to a blind person… but I also think the cool parts van be nice and probably are inevitable. Being able to communicate in your head, that sort of thing. I see it as something that will happen and people WILL do it.

    Also, who do you think will make these chips? A fairy? Of course companies will (and already do) make them.

    I think instead of screaming NONONO we should start thinking about what rules your any such companies to follow. Maybe have the design schematics be open source. A hard “off” button, somehow. A ban on ads and tracking (in combination with the hard off)

    Yeah there are very start things possible, doesn’t mean it has to be like that

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      Medical usage is different from the general public and when, not if, someone figures out an exploit, u can bet I’ll be glad I never got one.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      Yeah, what is this meme? Like I get Elon is a douche. But I mean where do people think deep brain simulation and things that help tons of people already come from? We even have implantable devices that can record seizures directly from the brain surface and generate electric impulses to disrupt them. Not to mention pacemakers, spinal cord stimulators, etc. All these things have quite a lot of regulatory hurdles before reaching market. Obviously want to make sure that framework stays strong so no dystopian nonsense down the line happens. Once we get to the level of consumer grade brainchips, then I’ll start to worry.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Alright, we’ll just rip the implants keeping patients seizure free out of their heads and tell everyone with Parkinson’s sorry, brain implants have to be removed now, go back to being frozen. Saying we can’t use a technology because someone might do something bad with it someday could apply to literally any technology.

          Or are you proposing getting rid of legal frameworks and regulation of medications would improve them somehow? Just let big pharma go realky wild? Strengthen our regulatory frameworks by all means, stop regulatory capture and all that, but an unbridled free for all with big pharma allowed to do, sell, and say whatever it wants about its products sounds horrific. I think you’re right to think the fda may have gotten a little too lenient with some approvals lately, but that’s an argument for stengthening the regulations not getting rid of them.

          But yeah Elon isn’t allowed to sell this shit yet, and people have to elect to be involved in any trials. It’s their choice. If he ever tries to sell it, he’ll have to prove efficacy and safety. Without that regulatory framework he wouldn’t need to do even that, could just immediately launch it and lie about the capabilities a la tesla auto pilot, duping and killing a bunch of people likely.

        • Phoenixz
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          the dystopian plan

          You should watch less tv, do less internet, and go outside a bit more

      • Phoenixz
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Even with consumer grade brain chips, the risk isn’t a bit thing until there is a direct interface and even then it’s a question of what it can interface with. And even then it’s a matter of good design. Some hardware off switch would be a basic requirement, but also software firewalling would be a very basic requirement.

        Interfaces, if done right, should not have to be a dystopian future, we won’t become the Borg just bectof some implant somewhere

        People should watch less tv.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      “Should doctors implant microchips in people’s brains”. Is the question, and the answer should be 100% between the doctor and patient.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1012 years ago

    I have a big brain, so I refuse all microchips. I won’t settle for anything less than a macrochip.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    212 years ago

    Given how big corpos are already fucking up the job market due to AI, it’s not such a good idea to go all in with cutting edge technologies right from the get-go

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      122 years ago

      New thing could become mandatory in a future and give governments direct access to our eyes, thoughts, hearing…

      Smart phone tracking would become a joke in comparison.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        We could also all be living under a social credit score system like in China, but most of us aren’t. Just because something could become our reality, doesn’t mean we should avoid all progress in that field.

        • newIdentity
          link
          fedilink
          92 years ago

          But Smartphones are tracked and hacked by governments. And it is legal in most cases. And people are killed by governments.

          • darcyOP
            link
            fedilink
            82 years ago

            the government only ever kills bad people, right? its not like laws will ever change

            • newIdentity
              link
              fedilink
              3
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              In the end it doesn’t matter if it’s legal or not. They will do it anyways. Like it was the case with Preditor and the Greek government. Or Pegasus and Mexico. In the case of Pegasus and Mexico, people actually died.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        Do you always take things way further then they’ll ever go? It’s pretty much blatant flanderazation at this point.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      Seems like young adults are becoming old men, calling the new gimmicky tech thing that hit the market that’s supposedly evil.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      The thing is, vaccines work pretty well, but letting some already corrupt asf corporation (or any entity) implant a microchip in your brain is obviously a bad idea. Please do a favor for yourself and the human race by sitting down for a few minutes and asking yourself: “what could go wrong?”.

  • rastilin
    link
    fedilink
    52 years ago

    I’m convinced that the Neuralink is the dumbest idea ever, but I’ve come to the conclusion that it’s better for people to just learn the hard way. Like, it’s so obviously stupid that anyone who’s still going for it cannot be helped.

    • darcyOP
      link
      fedilink
      72 years ago

      until it becomes the new mobile phone, and anyone who doesnt have the Chip™ is an outlier. i dont think this is likely, but it is most definitely possible

      • rastilin
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I’ve thought about it and I’ve decided that I can live with that. Besides, I don’t think it will make it to that level of popularity before “the incident” that shocks everyone and triggers a senate inquiry.

        Either there will be horrific side effects or Musk will cut quality or make an ‘executive decision’ that beams ads into everyone’s head. I don’t know the final implementation, but I think they won’t resist the temptation to make the firmware up-gradable remotely, and once they have that, they won’t resist the temptation to meddle.