Elon lied about the monkeys — and he shouldn’t be trusted to put his Neuralink chips in human brains.

“They are claiming they are going to put a safe device on the market, and that’s why you should invest,” Ryan Merkley at the Physicians Committee, told Wired. “And we see his lie as a way to whitewash what happened in these exploratory studies.”

Really heartbreaking reading what happened to the monkeys.

People quite rightly think of Elizabeth Holmes as a fraud for making false medical claims about what the Theranos machines could do. So why aren’t Elon’s claims at Neuralink being held to the same level of scrutiny?

https://futurism.com/neoscope/terrible-things-monkeys-neuralink-implants

@technology #Elon #Neuralink #ElonMusk

    • Aviandelight
      link
      fedilink
      82 years ago

      Theranos went down because Holmes was trying to run the same tired start-up scam all the big boys pull but within the confines of the medical industry. She would have succeeded if she had picked something non medical. The FDA doesn’t fuck around. If Elon thinks he’s smart enough to pull the same shit he’s going to “find out” too.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      92 years ago

      Once he’ll start losing investors’ money his lies will catch up to him. Nobody’s asking questions as long as line goes up.

      • Nuncio Bitis ✷ ✅
        link
        fedilink
        02 years ago

        @jonne @rood
        What makes you think that?
        tRump’s lies have been exposed, and the media is still pushing him as a savior.
        They’re doing the same with Melon Husk.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          SBF, Holmes, that woman that faked having 30m users on her platform, etc. And Trump never fooled most people, he’s been known to be a con man since the 80s to anyone that’s been paying attention.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        It depends on how much money he needs. Investors lost faith in Tesla once, and Elon invested in the company himself

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      Maybe they need the brains of their patients to have fewer wrinkles and have been playing 5D chess this whole time to ensure that happens

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        72 years ago

        i don’t particularly wish torture on anyone but if any of his techbro dipshit followers want to sign up…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      272 years ago

      Yup. You have to be a special kind of trusting to allow a company to modify your brain.

      Banal attempts at mind control, crude as they are, are bad enough already.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        14
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Honestly, interface chips in our brains would be a logical step at some point in the future. But hell would need to freeze, then thaw, then freeze over again before I trust anything of elons being inserted in my brain.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        62 years ago

        It’s easy to say as someone with a healthy brain. A blind, deaf or a paralyzed person might feel different once there truly is a way to get your sight back with this technology.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          I don’t have a healthy brain? Could be better could be worse but no fucking way would I let a private company with a shady safety record run by an insane megalomaniac fuck with it.

          Anything that’s plugging into your brain just can’t be controlled by a small group of people with the sole motive of line goes up. Open research and public ownership are required. The consequences are just too terrible otherwise.

        • ANGRY_MAPLE
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          “Truly” is the whole catch here. The problem is that Elon could very well prey on the people who have no other options. We are far from having evidence that it truly works.

          This is definitely one of those procedures that should need solid proof to be legal. It would be tragic for these people to die over some guy’s “trust me bro”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      732 years ago

      Or desperate. Forget the investors, Elon lied to those who saw it as a last ditch effort to beat their diseases.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        242 years ago

        Ah damn I didn’t think of that. I feel for them, but elon is the last person they should trust for that. I don’t honestly know who they should trust these days. But techbros aren’t one of them.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          92 years ago

          As a general rule of thumb, you should trust that a tech bro will con you by taking a normal idea and throwing around a bunch techno jargon to make it seem like cutting edge technology.

    • @raymccarthy

      Why? We already have brain interface links that do similar damage to neuralink, this isnt unusual or unexpected. In its current form it is rightfully used on terminal patients with locked-in syndom. In other words, people before it damaged their brain in a meaningful way and whom cant be further paralyzed.

      It would give these people a chance at someinteraction with the real world… What happened with the monkeys was about in line with other neural interfaces, its a consequence of the limits of the tech not negligence.

      @ajsadauskas @technology

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        I’m not well-versed on the subject, but can locked-in patients consent to these risks? How do we know they want to risk getting these life-threatening side effects?

        • @raymccarthy

          Point is what happened the monkeys is perfectly normal and expected… so nothing “not straight” about that (other than the sadness of animal testing)…

          That said I dont like them as a companya nd wouldnt buy an implant off of them if I needed one, sure… but you’d need a pretty solid objective reason to actually block them.

          @ajsadauskas @technology

  • David Treloar
    link
    fedilink
    92 years ago

    @ajsadauskas @technology

    That’s horrible, and also confirms what I said just the other day, who would trust him putting an implant in your brain, not me, and I already have brain damage.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1512 years ago

    Let’s not pretend Musk has fucking clue what’s going on or the science behind it.

    He isn’t down in trenches making discoveries. That’s just the image he presents.

    He buys companies and lets the actually competent people do the work while claiming credit.

    He’s been doing it since PayPal.

    He’s not a genius, he just has enough money to get actual geniuses to work for him.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      272 years ago

      He buys companies and lets the actually competent people do the work while claiming credit.

      Sometimes he actively interferes with those competent people too.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        222 years ago

        It was formed by merging his company X with Confinity. All he did was profit off it but many people seem to think he created it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          72 years ago

          To be clear, he did try to make them use his own work instead and it was awful so they pushed him out to protect the company.

        • JokeDeity
          link
          fedilink
          72 years ago

          LMFAO, I had no idea this wasn’t even the first time he called his dumb company X. He really is obsessed with that letter.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      172 years ago

      He buys companies and lets the actually competent people do the work while claiming credit.

      No he doesn’t. He meddles and interferes constantly and convinces himself that he’s adding value by doing so. That’s why Neuralink is dangerous. Meta or Alphabet or Microsoft or whoever can be trusted to let the scientists and the legal team ensure there’s very little risk of everything blowing up in their face horribly. Elon’s little empire is constantly on the verge of an absolute disaster. I would not be remotely surprised if Neuralink messes everything up so much that it sets back brain implants and BCI’s in general by decades. Purely because Elon can’t just supply the people at his businesses with the tools they need then get out of their way.

      • Dizzy Devil Ducky
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        I’m hoping this becomes another Chernobyl type incident where instead of people being against nuclear energy, it’s people against brain implants over the fear of how dangerous they are. At least for the implants that are not made specifically as medical devices that help instead of dumb people down with forced ads and memes.

    • maegul (he/they)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      77
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Someone put it well, if insensitively, about Sam Bankman Fried (FTX etc):

      Not actually smart but just LARP-ing the “Aspy genius” persona.

      However accurate that take is or offensive, I think it captures something about how nerd culture has gone mainstream and how it’s perceived.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          232 years ago

          As The Boys lovingly put it so many years ago, “nerds is cool now and jocks is pumping our gas.”

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            152 years ago

            I think that’s pretty romanticised.

            Assuming they leave their home town many end up in sales or similar making really good money.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    252 years ago

    Elon is already dreaming up ways to blame his human test subjects for his failures after they die horrifically from infections, brain bleeds, seizures, and psychosis.

  • NotAFuckingBot
    link
    fedilink
    142 years ago

    Chip Elon and put him through what he put the monkeys through. Same conditions.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    92 years ago

    The government convicted Michael Vick after they found out what happened to his dogs. Same government turning a blind eye to Elon’s monkeys and giving him a green light to experiment on humans. Elon playing through capitalism in god mode RN.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        What are you trying to say, law enforcement would take down Elon’s lab if only there were laws against animal abuse?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          It can be legal to do medical or biological research that is painful, kills the animal, paralyzes the animal, makes it die of cancer, etc.

          You need to get the correct permits and approvals and then it’s legal (I once worked in a lab that among other things killed mice and put their brains in a blender … it was legal, but I didn’t last long in bio after that).

          There’s no IRB system, there’s no NIH standards, there are no BSL criteria, that permit dogfighting.

          I can be aghast at the Neuralink outcomes without feeling sorry for Mike Vick. And I don’t.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            I think you get me wrong. I don’t feel sorry for Michael Vick. I just think this is more proof how money infects our regulatory system.

            Look at food regulation. I’ve seen regulators shut down and jail independent operations for white glove violations. But look how major suppliers and food chains are treated when their contaminated food sends people to the hospital where some die.