I’ve used most available services, but discontinued one after another along with promises that a better user experience will be provided with reduced content and removed functionality with the slight price hike. YouTube was my first and last video service I paid for, only Spotify remains on the borderline.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82 years ago

    As a IT dumbass, it seems all the listed options here so far are for Android. Are there any similar apps for IOS?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    332 years ago

    Why pay for that shit in the first place? Just use YouTube Revanced and install Sponsorblock while you’re at it.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      362 years ago

      I believe one should pay for services/content to promote costumer needs, put your money where your mouth is. But people need to stop being obsessed to always see the latest and greatest movie, sports event, concert etc. The business model would fall and it would force change but that will not happen on this 3rd planet.

      In this case I just wanted to remove ads the few times I opened the app without the hustle. Conviniance easily beats piracy, even quality will take a hit.

      I pay for mullvad and Proton since I like the service they provide and I encourage people to do the same.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        I know what you mean, but I refuse to throw money at Alphabet, when we’re basically the tradegoods to them. They siphon and sell off all of our information. I’m not paying for that. If I like a creator, I’d rather pay for their Patreon and get some more benefits with that.

        Plus, Revanced is way more convenient than the official YT app. You can customize the shit out of it.

        I pay for 3 different streaming services because it’s (still) more convenient than piracy. I pay for games because Steam and GoG are super convenient and they constantly have good deals. But fuck YT.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          Same. I’m happy to pay for Patreons or other donation methods to creators I really like, but no way I’m giving a cent to the big tech monstrosities that have monopolized the Internet. They deserve nothing.

    • oats
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      Well, you see my parents and grandparents don’t understand the concept of ads fully, especially in case of YouTube Shorts. After a few instances of them sharing the ads, thinking they were regular content, i just got the family plan.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      202 years ago

      Sometimes you would pay for convenience.

      In its golden years, I happily paid for Netflix because it had literally everything I wanted and it was easier than torrenting everything.

      • TheLemming
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        Yeah but NewPipe and ReVanced aren’t torrenting. They’re finished apps.

    • lukini
      link
      fedilink
      English
      212 years ago

      Some of us like to give back to the creators we watch in the easiest way possible while not seeing ads.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    34
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    This is stupid. Kick out a customer? Guess €0 per month is better than €7

    Greedy fucks

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      I do not understand the position where companies first provide a good service and and than later reduces the experience and functionality. YouTube especially, when they are providing a platform but not the content.

      Their AI would easily see that I more or less gave them free money since I wasn’t a high consumer putting any load on their data centers. I paid to remove the worst ads around to just see a few trailers and videos for the kids.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 years ago

        I do not understand the position where companies first provide a good service and and than later reduces the experience and functionality.

        Twitter has taught us that the vast majority, once committed to a platform, will tolerate endless abuse and never leave. So companies treat you real nice to get you in the door so they can piss all over you later.

        Do a search for “embrace extend extinguish” to learn more.

        • ඞmir
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          EEE is not really about that, this is more enshittification.

            • ඞmir
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 years ago

              EEE is about a big company acting like they’re helping a smaller company/organization, but they have the goal of taking full monopolistic control over the market. Enshittification is companies using loss leader products to create lock-in, and then slowly making the product worse to squeeze money out of all parties until the company’s product crashes and fades into irrelevancy.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            EEE and enshittification are very related concepts. The extinguish phase of EEE usually goes hand in hand with enshittification as once you’ve extinguished the competition you’re free to cut costs and enjoy a monopoly. Cutting costs leads to enshittification.

            • ඞmir
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              Related in the sense that they’re both common techniques in capitalism. You can use one without the other just fine. EEE can only be applied by market leaders, enshittification hits all (public) companies on the capitalist market.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        I don’t have numbers to offer but the initial pricing may have been losing them money. Some big companies will offer a service at a loss to get more customers to bite, then when the price hikes hit many of the customers will be used to the service and just sign up for the hike.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          This is the norm for the “X as a service” market. Since it’s a recurring revenue stream you can offer your “product” below cost to entice people since they’re going to have to keep paying up to continue using it. Then once you’ve hooked enough people you can dial up the pricing and dial down the costs/features. Fuck everything about this. I want to pay once and own for life.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            “Cloud” based services I genuinely understand the need for a recurring service model. They are paying for hosting of infrastructure on a recurring basis and a one time fee wouldn’t cover that.

            Generally, though. I agree. If I’m running the software locally, I want to own my license fully.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              32 years ago

              The problem is that they keep making stuff that was formerly a purchase (download, physical copy, run locally, etc) into unnecessary cloud services just to justify the transition to “X as a service”. I want to download it and keep it on my home server, not pay a recurring fee to access the same file over and over from a server.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 years ago

                Yeah. That’s a different problem. 😁

                I was more referring to the idea that subscriptions themselves are the problem.

                I’m also ok with subscription prices increasing over time as costs increase. But I completely agree with removing services being a bad thing.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      432 years ago

      Lol, to show our appreciation for being a paid member here’s a one month free trial that we give everyone regardless.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 years ago

        Yes it’s a joke but I have the option to just leave, worse would be if you are dependent on the platform in some way.

        I don’t see why companies should show you any appreciation except what you pay for or what you are given in return for your services, it would be nice but I do not demand it.

        If you don’t like it, leave it, or make a plan you can ditch it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    192 years ago

    I recommend a trip to India (VPN) for buying YT premium. Together with family I got my monthly price to approx. 1$

    • k_rol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      282 years ago

      It didn’t include YouTube Music. It was also offered in a few select countries.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        You don’t want YouTube + YouTube music but you want Spotify + YouTube? I abandoned Spotify the second YouTube Premium was introduced in my country. I loved Spotify. I started using it back when it was invite only. YouTube Music is worse for sure, but it’s good enough and a lot cheaper.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          72 years ago

          I use the third party app ViMusic to access Youtube music, not perfect but it works well, looks really good and it’s free and without any ads!

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            Android has Revanced for YT Music, which is what I use. Only thing I miss out on from premium is the automatic local caching of tracks (called downloading officially). But I just use a different app to download music from youtube playlists as mp3 files if I really need them offline.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          152 years ago

          An easy answer, Spotify are where my friends hang around. I would not have any second thoughts to drop Spotify, but for me I love to share playlists, tracks etc with family and friends.

          As general nobody use YouTube music here in Sweden.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            I know. I’m also from Sweden. Everyone uses Spotify. We were such early adopters on a very broad scale it very quickly became a standard. I don’t know anyone who uses YouTube Music except myself. Yes you can’t share songs or playlists but I realised when I couldn’t do it that I didn’t really miss doing it either. I can still send my friends a text about new songs I like. I dunno. To each their own I guess.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            You’re having me confused. I’ll never share any playlist and I’m on Spotify, should I leave then?

        • pitninja
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          I stopped paying for YouTube the moment Google killed Google Play Music and forced YouTube Music on me. Now Google gets no money from me and Apple does because they still offer a true music library service.

        • ɠισƚԋҽϝʅσɯ
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 years ago

          YT Music has a lot of the obscure indie (like soundcloud indie) music I love. The mobile app UX is close enough to Spotify.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 years ago

    good riddance. I ended mine when I realized how aggravated I was at paying for a service where I couldn’t specify a global resolution of 480p for mobile, and the auto-choices they provided always set me at 240p or 1080p, which either looked like shit or wrecked my data cap. If I have to micromanage the res per video, I’m just using uBO to block ads for free, and don’t watch YT on any device that doesn’t let me use it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 years ago

    It was a good run since the first days of mainstream Netflix. Now, I can’t keep up with all these services and subscriptions.