As it is already been said in this thread self defence is not authoritarian
The anti clerical violence in anarchistic Catalonia for example is not generally considered authoritarian because they were spontaneous acts undertaken on the agency of the perpetrators rather than being systematically carried out by a hierarchical organisation like with comparable ML ‘terrors’
hate is a strong word, but I think people here don’t enjoy sucking it off as some sort of artistic masterpiece, when it’s just another attempt at ‘serious adult animation’ with slightly more character development that what we’ve come to expect
Imo the fact that it gets so much praise, just shows how shallow popular culture is in general, that a show with even a shred of emotional relevancy, gets elevated as high(netflix astroturfing helped) as bjh did
If I were writing a story and wanted to include a Chinese character it would be 麻
It was pretty based when they killed that missionary
Sentinelese aint having no Christianity
i’m the bloodsucking ghoul
I think you’re reading a few things into my comment that aren’t there
‘Glad you agree that the gulaging of kulaks or the extermination of landlords is not authoritarian’ is quite a jump from what I said(make some pedantic argument about what constitutes self defence if you wish but I was clearly referring to immediate physical danger)
I didn’t say ‘my’ violence was ‘good’, I explained why people don’t consider the anti clerical violence authoritarian, as you asked
Who makes said rules? Who carries out the trial? Are they members of a hierarchical state with more power than the individual on trial? If so imo that is authoritarian