

Not if I view them using those third party apps they apparently need to charge an arm and a leg for.
Not if I view them using those third party apps they apparently need to charge an arm and a leg for.
The problem is - restaurants in most parts of the states cannot reliably do that. They’re going to see a higher price and they’re probably walking out soon after. Or worse - they stay and leave a shit review because they set their expectations at a higher bar of food quality than was provided.
If we could unilaterally remove exemptions for tipped wages, I’d see the possibility of it becoming much more common.
The only way to modify the design to fit that philosophy would be to make it very tedious to downvote something. “Are you sure” popups and multi-step. That way when people dislike it… they really dislike it.
for me it’s a really powerful statement.
Unfortunately, that’s not really the common thinking. It was the most commonly ignored piece of reddiquette.
And I’m fine with them wanting to do that.
The protest was less about them wanting to charge a price, it’s that in a time frame of 6 months reportedly went from “the API won’t have changes anytime soon” to “we’re going to pivot to a paid API soon” to “we’re charging you advertiser rates per x million API requests, starting in a month, and you cannot supplement with your own ads”.
There was no time for these apps to adjust their pricing models. Most were on yearly subscription models or ad-driven. Having that large a pivot in the rules with no time to adapt the business model is just shitty partnership on Reddit’s part.