Jabba the Hutt is so tasty when he’s well done.
Jabba the Hutt is so tasty when he’s well done.
Let me remind you of an event from not so long ago:
This argument, too, is addressed in the very first volume of Marx’s Capital.
Kosuka Bryat (Russian-Japanese)
Above all, and here is the invariable end of Sr de Bellièvre’s embassy, and the center where all his care must end, he will try to nourish and foment in such a way the division of the Independents with the Presbyterians and Scots, that they can never agree and unite to extinguish royalty and set themselves up as a republic.
It is an evil which could receive no comparison for us, and it would be far less harmful to us if the King of Great Britain were restored to his original authority, although we were certain that he must be our enemy, than if a republic of England and Scotland were formed, uncertain whether it would be a friend or an enemy of this Crown.
The reasons for this difference are easy to understand.
It’s a gist from the secret instruction to the French ambassador sent to England to “reconcile” King and Parliament. The translation is jerky, done automatically, using an online service. I wish someone who knows French well would do a literary translation of this unique self-disclosure document.
You may share socialist views, but the path of Marxism is the path of materialism. Studying the works of the classics one will inevitably encounter a materialist dialectic that is incompatible neither with religions (a form of idealism) nor with agnosticism.
What are you doing, stepdaughter?
there are 9-10 do and 64 don’t in this area
This is the essence of bourgeois democracy. Plebeians participate in the show of electing the oligarchs’ CEO, while the real politics takes place through legalized bribery (monetary censorship on the expression of interests). Everyone has the right to eat from the golden platter, but few can afford it.