

The feeling after reading this is that the automotive missed on software’s best practice’s from at least the last 2 decades. Maybe it’s because I’ve heard people saying they refuse to buy cars made after 2010, because of the bad quality
The feeling after reading this is that the automotive missed on software’s best practice’s from at least the last 2 decades. Maybe it’s because I’ve heard people saying they refuse to buy cars made after 2010, because of the bad quality
It didn’t get review-bombed. It got negative reviews after the last update because people don’t like it.
Personally I bought it and don’t like it: it’s an awkward mix between diablo-likes and souls-like, while not reaching the heights of either, it also has its own unresolved issues, like lack of descriptions for weapons or abilities. This might have been fine on the first release of the early access, but we’re almost a year in and people expect initial 8ssues to be fixed.
Did Synology just hire some brain dead Broadcom executive?
Well, Citrix’s CEO was Broadcom’ software boss
And also hasa place at the US treasury, he’s DOGE-affiliated as well: https://www.crn.com/news/cloud/2025/citrix-parent-ceo-krause-on-doge-role-we-re-applying-public-company-standards-to-the-federal-government
Xcp-ng might have the edge against bare metal because Windows uses virtualization by default uses Virtualization-Based Security (VBS). Under xcp-ng it can’t use that since nested virtualization can’t be enabled.
Disclaimer: I’m a maintainer of the control plane used by xcp-ng
Isn’t that the bare minimum mandated by the EU?