• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Lol, I haven’t taken a side

      I just pointed out a bias and that there isn’t enough information for anyone to take a side

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        we tend to show bias towards the victims. even if those women started it, they shouldn’t have been beaten… by men. if you’re a man, you don’t touch a woman unless it’s self defense.

        you really come off as some kind of edgy teen douche. are you an edgy teen douche?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          We don’t know who the victim is

          All we know is the woman claims to be the victim and the men claim to be the victim

          you don’t touch a woman unless it’s self defense.

          Equality, you don’t touch anyone unless it’s self defence

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            the victim is the WOMAN, how was beaten mercilessly by a GROUP OF MEN. jesus christ, people. only in a morally bankrupt society would this even be a question.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Weird then that you would advocate this

              i’d ship every person that insists on their religion over science to some hellhole to rot away. building a better world now saves future generations form suffering. the payoff is immeasurable.

              When presumably some of those people would be women

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                women aren’t a fey creature that is innately good.

                also, i don’t see a long term solution for humanity that doesn’t involve cracking a few eggs to make an omelet. it’s a simple trolley dilemma.