In this post, I saw a lot of people coming to Bad Empanada’s defense, and felt like they may be uninformed about his actual positions of things, so I felt that this ought to be posted.

      • Egon [they/them]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2111 months ago

        I am very serious, the only difference really is that Mao isn’t a youtube. Time will tell wether BadEmpada, the modern day philosopher that he is, will have any actual influence on this world and we were right to care about him or if he was just another way to get my brain to give me sweet dopamine by arguing with people online.

    • Egon [they/them]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2011 months ago

      What do you mean? They both had good opinions and bad opinions, I am very serious and also objectively correct.

        • Egon [they/them]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Not an argument. And since we are obviously having a very serious debate about a very serious topic, I would like for you to concede your position and admit that the only difference is that Mao wasn’t an influencer debate-me-debate-me