In this post, I saw a lot of people coming to Bad Empanada’s defense, and felt like they may be uninformed about his actual positions of things, so I felt that this ought to be posted.
In this post, I saw a lot of people coming to Bad Empanada’s defense, and felt like they may be uninformed about his actual positions of things, so I felt that this ought to be posted.
What do you mean? They both had good opinions and bad opinions, I am very serious and also objectively correct.
No! NO!
Not an argument. And since we are obviously having a very serious debate about a very serious topic, I would like for you to concede your position and admit that the only difference is that Mao wasn’t an influencer