There might literally not be one single person on the planet less qualified to speak to the issue of “reasonable spending” than the guy who spent $44 billion dollars to make everybody hate Twitter.
He also took billions in government subsidies and ordered the construction of a car tunnel with LED lights and zero safety measures. That one was a success for its intended purposes, however; it prevented the construction of mass transit rail in California.
I think he made that up after the fact once it became abundantly clear how dumb hyperloop was. US states, generally, don’t need the help of a billionaire to stay car-brained public transport deniers.
There might literally not be one single person on the planet less qualified to speak to the issue of “reasonable spending” than the guy who spent $44 billion dollars to make everybody hate Twitter.
He also took billions in government subsidies and ordered the construction of a car tunnel with LED lights and zero safety measures. That one was a success for its intended purposes, however; it prevented the construction of mass transit rail in California.
I think he made that up after the fact once it became abundantly clear how dumb hyperloop was. US states, generally, don’t need the help of a billionaire to stay car-brained public transport deniers.
He never wanted improved mass transit in California, so even if he bumblefucked into that outcome, it’s still serendipity for him.
idk money well spent imo
We should abolish money anyway