He is saying it should be “correct makes strong and as either side can be correct it is being correct that makes you strong” … I think. Or he’s saying “strong makes correct” as in “sometimes weak is correct but strong is always correct.” Either way its some murky ‘too-clever-for-my-own-britches’ bullshit.
He’s saying that people that are disadvantaged are not always “right.” And then he swings hard for the fascist fences by suddenly trampling over that open ended vagueness by saying might makes right, actually.
This was pretty much my take. Idk why he seems to think he needs to periodically post some quasi-intelligent drivel once a month though. His fans already think he’s Space Jesus and the Left hate him for being a fascist dork and aren’t at any risk of suddenly thinking he’s some wise sage.
Not sure if what he posted makes no sense or if that’s because English is not my first language, but I cannot make sense of what he tried to say.
Could someone please explain it to me in simpler terms?
He is saying it should be “correct makes strong and as either side can be correct it is being correct that makes you strong” … I think. Or he’s saying “strong makes correct” as in “sometimes weak is correct but strong is always correct.” Either way its some murky ‘too-clever-for-my-own-britches’ bullshit.
He’s saying that people that are disadvantaged are
not always “right.” And then he swings hard for the fascist fences by suddenly trampling over that open ended vagueness by saying might makes right, actually.
This was pretty much my take. Idk why he seems to think he needs to periodically post some quasi-intelligent drivel once a month though. His fans already think he’s Space Jesus and the Left hate him for being a fascist dork and aren’t at any risk of suddenly thinking he’s some wise sage.
Otherwise he’d lose relevance. As a mere CEO, he’s not doing the actual work at his companies after all
Thanks its clearer now.